Dear mentor-readers,
Recently, I ran into the following problem, which I'm unable to solve
unless a powerpc (PPC) user is willing/able to assist by either performing
some tests in collaboration with me, or by (temporarily) offering me an
account.
Here's the problem:
On packages.debian.or
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the
> following objections:
>
> E: dict-web1913: no-copyright-file
> W: dict-web1913: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: dict-web1913: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc-
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:07:57PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > > > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > > > provide a copyright file?
> > >
> > > No.
>
> Er, YES.
Er, NO. My package sgb-src
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the
> following objections:
>
> E: dict-web1913: no-copyright-file
> W: dict-web1913: prerm-does-not-remove-usr-doc-link
> W: dict-web1913: postinst-does-not-set-usr-doc
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:07:57PM +1200, Michael Beattie wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > > > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > > > provide a copyright file?
> > >
> > > No.
>
> Er, YES.
Er, NO. My package sgb-src
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > > provide a copyright file?
> >
> > No.
Er, YES.
> Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the
> following objections:
>
> E: dict-
On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 04:46:20PM -0400, Bob Hilliard wrote:
> > > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > > provide a copyright file?
> >
> > No.
Er, YES.
> Thanks, Julian. This works like a charm, but Lintian has the
> following objections:
>
> E: dict
t; Don't even bother with the README.Debian file, just have an empty
> package and this message in the Description field in the control
> file.
>
> > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > provide a copyright file?
>
> No.
>
>
t; Don't even bother with the README.Debian file, just have an empty
> package and this message in the Description field in the control
> file.
>
> > In order to be allowed in the archive, will it be necessary to
> > provide a copyright file?
>
> No.
>
>
The only thing functionally required in the dummy package is a
> control file, and possibly a README.Debian file advising the user that
> he may purge this package at any time.
Don't even bother with the README.Debian file, just have an empty
package and this message in the Descri
The only thing functionally required in the dummy package is a
> control file, and possibly a README.Debian file advising the user that
> he may purge this package at any time.
Don't even bother with the README.Debian file, just have an empty
package and this message in the Descri
I have ITP'd dict-gcide (Bug#100892). This package will provide,
conflict and replace dict-web1913. I intend to provide an empty
(dummy) dict-web1913 package that will depend on dict-gcide.
The only thing functionally required in the dummy package is a
control file, and possibly a READ
I have ITP'd dict-gcide (Bug#100892). This package will provide,
conflict and replace dict-web1913. I intend to provide an empty
(dummy) dict-web1913 package that will depend on dict-gcide.
The only thing functionally required in the dummy package is a
control file, and possibly a REA
13 matches
Mail list logo
