Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-08-05 Thread Fabrice Aeschbacher
Le mer. 5 août 2015 à 13:00, Vincent Bernat a écrit : > ❦ 5 août 2015 10:28 GMT, Fabrice Aeschbacher < > fabrice.aeschbac...@gmail.com> : > > > I did also read on debian-devel that putting the debian/ directory in > > the same (git) repo has some drawbacks and is not recommended (at > > least n

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-08-05 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 5 août 2015 13:50 +0200, Jakub Wilk  : >>>https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What.27s_wrong_with_upstream_shipping_a_debian.2F_directory.3F >> The arguments all rely on .diff.gz which is not used anymore with >> 3.0 formats. I think the whole entry should be removed as there is >> now li

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-08-05 Thread Eduardo M KALINOWSKI
On Qua, 05 Ago 2015, Fabrice Aeschbacher wrote: I did also read on debian-devel that putting the debian/ directory in the same (git) repo has some drawbacks and is not recommended (at least not in the same branch). I cannot remember all arguments, but some can be found here : https://wiki.debian.

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-08-05 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Vincent Bernat , 2015-08-05, 12:59: https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq#What.27s_wrong_with_upstream_shipping_a_debian.2F_directory.3F The arguments all rely on .diff.gz which is not used anymore with 3.0 formats. I think the whole entry should be removed as there is now little interest

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-08-05 Thread Vincent Bernat
❦ 5 août 2015 10:28 GMT, Fabrice Aeschbacher  : > >> I wanted to ask for an inclusion in debian, but the policy says > >> even if I'm upstream myself, I'm not supposed to have a debian/ > >> directory at all. > > > > There is no such policy. > > > > debian/ in .orig.t

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-08-05 Thread Fabrice Aeschbacher
> > > * Danny Edel , 2015-07-31, 22:51: > >> I wanted to ask for an inclusion in debian, but the policy says that > >> even if I'm upstream myself, I'm not supposed to have a debian/ > >> directory at all. > > > > There is no such policy. > > > > debian/ in .orig.tar might be slightly annoying for

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-08-01 Thread Danny Edel
On 31/07/15 23:16, Jakub Wilk wrote: > Hi Danny! > > * Danny Edel , 2015-07-31, 22:51: >> I wanted to ask for an inclusion in debian, but the policy says that >> even if I'm upstream myself, I'm not supposed to have a debian/ >> directory at all. > > There is no such policy. > > debian/ in .or

Re: Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-07-31 Thread Jakub Wilk
Hi Danny! * Danny Edel , 2015-07-31, 22:51: I wanted to ask for an inclusion in debian, but the policy says that even if I'm upstream myself, I'm not supposed to have a debian/ directory at all. There is no such policy. debian/ in .orig.tar might be slightly annoying for the Debian maintain

Dropping debian/ directory vs Continuous Integration / daily-debs

2015-07-31 Thread Danny Edel
Dear Debian mentors, I hope this is the right place to ask this kind of question. If it's not, a pointer in the right direction would be much appreciated. I have programmed a software called [dspdfviewer], and I feel its reasonably stable and usable (it is acquiring a growing userbase, judging f