Tyler MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > They really should state that if it is their intention. A lot of
> > those "builder" type programs do it, such as auto* bison and dh-make
> > (I changed it after someone pointed out the problem with not having
> > the specific exception).
>
> F
Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > However, if you run "perl ppport.h --strip", all documentation *and*
> > licensing information was removed. My feeling is that if the authors of
> > Devel::PPPort allow the license to be removed (while still leaving other
> > comments intact in the hea
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:13:44PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> This makes me wonder about ppport.h in perl-XS packages; by default,
> the generated ppport.h comes with a note saying it's licensed under the same
> terms as perl itself.
>
> However, if you run "perl ppport.h --strip"
Craig Small <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > reluctant to do this. Too much information kills information.
> I don't for any of my "autoconfed" packages. The output files have
> "do whatever" type of license, as does most output files of this type.
This makes me wonder about ppport.h in per
> I have one last question: the package uses autoconf. Do I have to
> mention every autoconf-related file and remind their copyright holder
> and licence in the copyright file of the Debian package? I am a bit
> reluctant to do this. Too much information kills information.
I don't for any of my "au
Le Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:07:18AM +0200, Bas Wijnen a écrit :
> The LGPL specifies that the user may redistribute the software
> under the LGPL, or the GPL. So you (as packager) can simply choose to do your
> redistribution under the terms of the GPL. It's a good idea to mention this
> in the co
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 09:07:18AM +0200, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:12:10PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:02:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > > It appears that, although the COPYING file and the website
> > > claim that TreeView X is GPL, all t
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 01:12:10PM +1000, Craig Small wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:02:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > It appears that, although the COPYING file and the website
> > claim that TreeView X is GPL, all the source files have Library GPL
> > headers (except the Nexus one
On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:02:01AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> It appears that, although the COPYING file and the website
> claim that TreeView X is GPL, all the source files have Library GPL
> headers (except the Nexus ones of course). Technically, what is the
> licence of TreeView X? LGP
Le Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:17:32PM +1000, Craig Small a écrit :
> Nexus class libraries are found at http://hydrodictyon.eeb.uconn.edu/ncl/
> I would strongly reccomend that these were packaged separately and that
> you use the ones directly from the author's site.
Dear Craig,
Thanks for
10 matches
Mail list logo
