On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 06:13:44PM -0700, Tyler MacDonald wrote: > This makes me wonder about ppport.h in perl-XS packages; by default, > the generated ppport.h comes with a note saying it's licensed under the same > terms as perl itself. > > However, if you run "perl ppport.h --strip", all documentation *and* > licensing information was removed. My feeling is that if the authors of > Devel::PPPort allow the license to be removed (while still leaving other > comments intact in the header file), that means that they really dont care > how the released file is licensed. They really should state that if it is their intention. A lot of those "builder" type programs do it, such as auto* bison and dh-make (I changed it after someone pointed out the problem with not having the specific exception).
- Craig -- Craig Small GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.enc.com.au/ MIEE Debian developer csmall at : enc.com.au ieee.org debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
