On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 08:41:10AM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > > They was fixed by the experimental 0l.10.0-rc3 upstream release, which
> > > eventually became 0.10.0 by upstream and pushed to sid as 0.10.0-1. This
> > > should have been mentioned in -1, but was not, hence the -1 note.
> > If the
On Wed, 16 Aug 2017 02:01:12 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:32:55PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > > Why does the report title say "NMU"?
> >
> > Perhaps it shouldn't - large parts of the debian workflow is still
a mystery
> > for me.
> Please read
> https://www.d
Control: retitle -1 RFS: lirc/0.10.0-2
On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 10:32:55PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> > Why does the report title say "NMU"?
>
> Perhaps it shouldn't - large parts of the debian workflow is still a mystery
> for me.
Please read
https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-referen
Hi!
Thanks for feedback! I seem to have lost some chunk of messages, or
possibly I just missed your reply and removed it. Sorry for that.
That said, here we go:
On Mon, 14 Aug 2017 23:26:47 +0500 Andrey Rahmatullin
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> Why does the report title say "NM
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Why does the report title say "NMU"?
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 05:41:45PM +0200, Alec Leamas wrote:
> * Restore parallel builds, accidentally disabled in -2
debian/compat says 10, so --parallel is the default.
> * Fixed upstream bus #294 (VPATH build issues, in -1).
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "lirc"
* Package name: lirc
Version : 0.10.0-2
Upstream Author : leamas.alec AT gmail DOT com (current maintainer)
* URL : http://sf.net/p/lirc
* License
6 matches
Mail list logo