On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:40:12PM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> Hello again,
>
> A new version has been uploaded to mentors. It contains the following
> changes since last time:
>
> - Upstream's CGAL patches were removed from the DFSG sources to
>simplify copyright information. These are n
Hello again,
A new version has been uploaded to mentors. It contains the following
changes since last time:
- Upstream's CGAL patches were removed from the DFSG sources to
simplify copyright information. These are not needed for CGAL >>
4.11, and so the build-deps were updated accordingly.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 06:29:33PM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 March 2018 13:58:07 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 06:48:10PM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > > On Sunday 11 March 2018 00:18:32 CET Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48
On Tuesday 13 March 2018 13:58:07 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 06:48:10PM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > On Sunday 11 March 2018 00:18:32 CET Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > > Please review d/copyright. I found at l
Saw this mail too late, sorry for this
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:20:52AM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 7 March 2018 20:10:29 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
(...)
> > - many versioned build dependencies are already satisfied since
> > oldstable. As thus those old version constraint can
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 06:48:10PM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> On Sunday 11 March 2018 00:18:32 CET Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > Please review d/copyright. I found at least one undocumented file which
> > >
On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:18:32AM +0100, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> > But the lintian stuff I complained about is not completly fixed, there
> > is even a new tag:
> > I: gudhi source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-external-doc-
> > r
On Sunday 11 March 2018 00:18:32 CET Gard Spreemann wrote:
> On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> > Please review d/copyright. I found at least one undocumented file which
> > is licensed Apache 2.0 and another one under LGPL3+. Neither are in
> > d/copyright.
>
> I'm look
On Wednesday 7 March 2018 20:10:29 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> Argh, was not done yet when I hit send...
>
> - d/rules:
> - the override for dh_autoclean could be replaced by the file d/clean
Fixed.
> - as you arch all packages: please build those in build-indep.
> Especially doxygen has a hu
On Wednesday 7 March 2018 19:32:48 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> But the lintian stuff I complained about is not completly fixed, there
> is even a new tag:
> I: gudhi source: quilt-patch-missing-description no-external-doc-
> resources.patch
>
> Please run lintian after every build! Best, include it
Argh, was not done yet when I hit send...
- d/rules:
- the override for dh_autoclean could be replaced by the file d/clean
- as you arch all packages: please build those in build-indep.
Especially doxygen has a huge dependency chain, so this will take load
off the buildds, especially those ar
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:24:53 +0100 Gard Spreemann
> Upstream provided a patch that fixes this. I've updated
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gudhi/gudhi_2.1.0+dfsg
-1.dsc
Thanks!
But the lintian stuff I complained about is not completly fixed, there
On Wednesday 28 February 2018 22:26:58 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> But there are tons of lintian warnings "privacy-break-generic", just
> one example: Not checked, but maybe some template for the doc
> generation has a link to this site?
>
> W: libgudhi-doc: privacy-breach-generic
> […]
Upstream pr
On Wednesday, 28 February 2018 22:26:58 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> Ok, it builds now.
> But there are tons of lintian warnings "privacy-break-generic", just
> one example: Not checked, but maybe some template for the doc
> generation has a link to this site?
>
> […]
>
> There are other lintian war
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Mon, 05 Feb 2018 11:07:40 +0100 Gard Spreemann wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> On Tuesday 26 December 2017 21:58:36 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> > I was checking your RFS, but I cannot get it compiled...
> > Please check and then remove the moreinfo tag again..
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
On Tuesday 26 December 2017 21:58:36 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> I was checking your RFS, but I cannot get it compiled...
> Please check and then remove the moreinfo tag again...
Hello again,
Upstream has now released GUDHI 2.1.0 which is compatible with the
CGAL versio
On Tuesday 26 December 2017 21:58:36 CET Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Gard,
>
> I was checking your RFS, but I cannot get it compiled...
Hello Tobias, and thanks for your feedback.
Apparently this is a known regression [1] when building with CGAL
4.11. That version entered sid after last time I buil
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Gard,
I was checking your RFS, but I cannot get it compiled...
Please check and then remove the moreinfo tag again...
tobi
excerpt from the log:
/build/gudhi-
2.0.1+dfsg/example/Persistent_cohomology/weighted_alpha_complex_3d_pers
istence.cpp:57:21: error: 'Bare_po
On 16/10/17 15:39, Gard Spreemann wrote:
On Monday 16 October 2017 11:53:08 CEST Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
On 16/10/17 11:22, Gard Spreemann wrote:
Not relevant since the upload would be to sid anyway, right?
FYI, current version is 4.1.1.
Checked and bumped. Thanks.
E: python3-gudhi: b
On Monday 16 October 2017 11:53:08 CEST Ghislain Vaillant wrote:
> On 16/10/17 11:22, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> > Not relevant since the upload would be to sid anyway, right?
>
> FYI, current version is 4.1.1.
Checked and bumped. Thanks.
> > E: python3-gudhi: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
> >
On 16/10/17 11:22, Gard Spreemann wrote:
On Saturday 14 October 2017 00:56:11 CEST Adam Borowski wrote:
Before a human review, it'd be good to fix issues found by automated
tools. In particular, lintian throws a lot. Please run it on both
source and built packages (lintian gudhi*changes).
"li
On Saturday 14 October 2017 00:56:11 CEST Adam Borowski wrote:
> Before a human review, it'd be good to fix issues found by automated
> tools. In particular, lintian throws a lot. Please run it on both
> source and built packages (lintian gudhi*changes).
>
> "lintian -i" gives a helpful explanat
Hi!
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:09:41AM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> The package has now been updated to the latest upstream (2.0.1).
>
> It can be downloaded by
>
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gudhi/gudhi_2.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc
Before a human review, it'd be good to fi
The package has now been updated to the latest upstream (2.0.1).
It can be downloaded by
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gudhi/gudhi_2.0.1+dfsg-1.dsc
Regards,
Gard Spreemann
24 matches
Mail list logo
