Bug#818974: packaging

2016-07-02 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, gpvdm ping (I wrote a review on the bug, months ago) G. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-05-01 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 10:10:28 +0100 Roderick MacKenzie wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, >  I've now used license-reconcile and a bit of copy and paste from > hedgewars to sort out the copyright file.  It's now only complains > about a single .png image - although I think

Re: Bug#818974: packaging

2016-04-24 Thread Adam Borowski
On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 09:06:26AM +0200, Dominique Dumont wrote: > You can also try "cme update dpkg-copyright". > > See > https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/wiki/Updating-debian-copyright-file-with-cme > for instructions, Bad advice, I'm afraid. Here's a typical result of using cme: htt

Re: Bug#818974: packaging

2016-04-24 Thread Dominique Dumont
On Saturday 23 April 2016 10:10:28 Roderick MacKenzie wrote: > I've now used license-reconcile and a bit of copy and paste from > hedgewars to sort out the copyright file. You can also try "cme update dpkg-copyright". See https://github.com/dod38fr/config-model/wiki/Updating-debian-copyright-fi

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-04-23 Thread Roderick MacKenzie
Hi Gianfranco,   I've now used license-reconcile and a bit of copy and paste from hedgewars to sort out the copyright file.  It's now only complains about a single .png image - although I think this could be a bug in license-reconcile as the copyright file looks OK to me. I also think my upload_ev

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-04-20 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, quick answer: thanks for the fixes. some quick issues: copyright is missing the copyright text (look e.g. hedgewars package to see a some licenses to copy-paste) Depends: is for runtime dependencies, having a -dev here is just wrong. please let shlibs:Depends do its job, and probably if it

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-04-20 Thread Roderick MacKenzie
control: tags -1 Hi All, Thanks for all the comments. Sorry for the delay in responding, I realized that it would be much better if the code built using autotools - rather than my random build system. So, I swapped out the build system for autotools, this took quite a while. The old build sy

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-03-31 Thread Roderick MacKenzie
Hi Gianfranco, Thanks for your support! I'm currently making my way through the suggestions. I've also got some more suggestions from IRC. I'll post the changes I've made when done. I expect it will take about 2 weeks. I've also moving the build system to autoconf/automake to make it all more

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-03-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
control: owner -1 ! control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, please remove moreinfo when done, and I'll have a look/sponsor the package. thanks for your work! Gianfranco

Bug#818974: packaging

2016-03-26 Thread Roderick MacKenzie
Hi Paul, Thanks for going through the package, and your comments. I'm part way through sorting these issues now. I also got some more comments of f IRC the other night. When I'm done I'll try again to look for a sponsor. many thanks, Rod