Bug#712799: RFS: ctesf/1.0-1 ITP

2013-06-23 Thread Jakub Wilk
about the Lintian errors I just verified that when i did the "debuild -S -sa" i will not get errors, and i thought was enough, so i'm going to read more about lintian ;) Lintian can check both source and binary packages. So try without -S. :) You may want also to enable displaying some low seve

Bug#712799: RFS: ctesf/1.0-1 ITP

2013-06-20 Thread tglman
Hi Jakub, I understand your point of view and I knew that are already there many C/C++ testing framework, the difference to the other framework is the binary of tests are shared library and not executable, and the "test runner" have built in raw memory leak detector that allow to have a leak r

Bug#712799: RFS: ctesf/1.0-1 ITP

2013-06-19 Thread Jakub Wilk
(I don't indend to sponsor this package. Sorry!) * tglman , 2013-06-19, 18:21: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctesf/ctesf_1.0-1.dsc We have already plenty of C++ testing frameworks in the archive: cpputest, cxxtest, gtest, libtut, unittest++, cppunit... How is ctesf better/differ

Bug#712799: RFS: ctesf/1.0-1 ITP

2013-06-19 Thread tglman
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ctesf". * Package name: ctesf Version : 1.0-1 Upstream Author : tglman * URL : http://sourceforge.net/projects/ctesf.testframework.p * License : LGPLv3