Hi Jakub,
I understand your point of view and I knew that are already there many
C/C++ testing framework,
the difference to the other framework is the binary of tests are shared
library and not executable,
and the "test runner" have built in raw memory leak detector that allow
to have a leak report per test.
anyway one of the main reasons because i want publish this package is
that is used in other software that i want to package
early like: https://github.com/tglman/orientdb-c
about the origin package i extract it from the git repository with "git
archive" this is the
branch:http://sourceforge.net/p/testframework/ctesf/code/ci/debian/tree/,
this is my first debian package so probably I'm doing it wrong!!
about the Lintian errors I just verified that when i did the "debuild -S
-sa" i will not get errors, and i thought was enough, so i'm going to
read more about lintian ;)
I can understand if you don't want accept this package, but i'm looking
for package also other software(maybe more interesting), so can you give
me a feedback about
the mistakes in this package in such way i can avoid it in the next!
On 06/19/2013 07:40 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
(I don't indend to sponsor this package. Sorry!)
* tglman <tgl...@tglman.com>, 2013-06-19, 18:21:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/ctesf/ctesf_1.0-1.dsc
We have already plenty of C++ testing frameworks in the archive:
cpputest, cxxtest, gtest, libtut, unittest++, cppunit...
How is ctesf better/different than them?
How was your orig.tar generated? It matches neither the one that uscan
download, nor the one get-orig-source generates...
Lintian emits:
W: ctesf-dbg: debug-file-with-no-debug-symbols
usr/lib/debug/usr/lib/libctesf-1.0.so
W: ctesf-dbg: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: ctesf-dbg: copyright-without-copyright-notice
W: ctesf-dbg: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory
usr/share/doc/ctesf-dbg/copyright
W: ctesf: hardening-no-relro usr/lib/libctesf-1.0.so
I: ctesf: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/libctesf-1.0.so
W: ctesf: missing-depends-line
W: ctesf: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: ctesf: copyright-without-copyright-notice
I: ctesf: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
W: ctesf: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory usr/share/doc/ctesf/copyright
E: ctesf: sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname
usr/lib/libctesf-1.0.so
W: ctesf-dev: new-package-should-close-itp-bug
W: ctesf-dev: copyright-without-copyright-notice
I: ctesf-dev: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
W: ctesf-dev: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory
usr/share/doc/ctesf-dev/copyright
Typos:
informantion -> information
Retrine -> Retrieve (?)
distructor -> destructor
contructor -> constructor
inizialization -> initialization
multile -> multiple
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51c38053.3080...@tglman.com
