Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-29 Thread Roger Light
Hi David, > Thanks, the three RC-bug fixes are pretty straightforward, but the DEP-3 > headers don't contain an Applied-Upstream field. Since you seem involved > upstream, are those fixes not applied upstream because of a rewrite of > those parts in the current code? If not, could you please point

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-29 Thread David Prévot
Hi Roger, Le 29/12/2012 11:21, Roger Light a écrit : > I've uploaded a new version that > doesn't include the unrelated changes. Thanks, the three RC-bug fixes are pretty straightforward, but the DEP-3 headers don't contain an Applied-Upstream field. Since you seem involved upstream, are those fi

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-29 Thread Roger Light
Hi, On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:59 AM, David Prévot wrote: > doesn't seem in line with the current freeze policy [0], Rule #1: “do > not make changes to the package that are not related to fixing the bugs > in question […] this implies *not* […] Changing debhelper compat version” I agree, that sh

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-28 Thread David Prévot
Hi, I haven't looked at the three RC bugs you just filled, nor how you fixed them, but Le 28/12/2012 21:45, Roger Light a écrit : > * Bumped standards release to 3.9.3. No changes needed. > * Bumped dh compat to 9 to fix hardening-no-fortify-functions. > * Fixed python-module-in-wrong-loca

Bug#696907: RFS: mosquitto/0.15-2 [RC]

2012-12-28 Thread Roger Light
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "mosquitto" * Package name: mosquitto Version : 0.15-2 Upstream Author : Roger Light * URL : http://mosquitto.org/ * License : 3 clause BSD Section