Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-26 Thread marciotex
"Eddy Petrişor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Eddy Petrişor wrote: >> >> ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools >> >> before cdbs runs was my point. >> > >> > Err, yes, my bad, indeed, you did not say that. >> >>

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eddy Petrişor wrote: >> ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools >> before cdbs runs was my point. > > Err, yes, my bad, indeed, you did not say that. OK, I see the problem. I've used "autotools" where I really meant

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Neil Williams
Eddy Petrişor wrote: >> ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools >> before cdbs runs was my point. > > Err, yes, my bad, indeed, you did not say that. OK, I see the problem. I've used "autotools" where I really meant "automake" - i.e. the normal make process that all bi

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All this is quite a lot of automake patching and if you can get upstream >> onside it will be a lot easier. > > Running autotools in debian/rules ? I didn't say to

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Neil Williams
Eddy Petrişor wrote: > On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> All this is quite a lot of automake patching and if you can get upstream >> onside it will be a lot easier. > > Running autotools in debian/rules ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools befo

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. > > How implement conditions following? > > 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo >source package > 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon > 3)

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Neil Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi. > > How implement conditions following? > > 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo >source package > 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon > 3) debian/control contains libfoo0 (Architecture: any)

Re: 1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-25 Thread Eddy Petrişor
On 6/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi. How implement conditions following? 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo source package 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon 3) debian/control contains libfoo0 (

1 source, 2 binaries, 2 CFLAGS and cdbs

2006-06-24 Thread marciotex
Hi. How implement conditions following? 1) libfoo0 and libfoo0-athlon are binary packages builded from libfoo source package 2) CFLAGS for build libfoo0 are differents that for build libfoo0-athlon 3) debian/control contains libfoo0 (Architecture: any) and libfoo0-athlon (Architecture: i38