"Eddy Petrişor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 6/25/06, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Eddy Petrişor wrote:
>> >> ? I didn't say to do that. Patching the Makefiles used by autotools
>> >> before cdbs runs was my point.
>> >
>> > Err, yes, my bad, indeed, you did not say that.
>>
>> OK, I see the problem. I've used "autotools" where I really meant
>> "automake" - i.e. the normal make process that all binary packages need
>> to be built from the upstream source tarball. ./configure, make, make
>> install. That was my bad - I'm upstream as well as maintainer for all my
>
>> >> autotools are run (once) via the normal cdbs processes as before, but
>> >
>> > Err, didn't you say that you were not advocating running autotools
>> > from debian/rules? Or am I missing something?
>>
>> Yes, but it wasn't really what I meant. Sorry.
>> :-(
>
> No problem :-)
>
[cut]
Thank you very much, Neil and Eddy. Discussion was very
instructive. I'll try adapt upstream following yours instructions and
send patch for upstream.
Best regards,
--
Marcio Roberto Teixeira
chave pública: hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net
http://marciotex.googlepages.com/keypub_8709626B.asc
página pessoal (em construção): http://marciotex.googlepages.com
Usuário "tchê" Debian/GNULinux
Porto Alegre - RS - Brasil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
