version to mentors, so thank you again for
reviewing it!
Thanks,
KevinDuan
在2023年02月24 04时44分，"Boyuan Yang"写道：
Hi,
在 2023-02-22星期三的 17:25 +0800，Kevin Duan写道：
> HI!
>
> Thanks for the heads up, I have fixed this issue in the latest version and
> have also uploaded the
3 at 11:05:42AM +0800, kevin wrote:
> * Package name : libkysdk-base
>Version : 1.0.1-1
> libkysdk-base (1.0.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Initial release. (Closes: #1031344)
Hi!
Alas, the package fails to build:
.
dh_missing: warning: etc/kysd
+moreinfo
Indeed, please fix the error listed below before we can proceed.
Thanks,
Boyuan Yang
On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 19:55:44 +0100 Adam Borowski
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:05:42AM +0800, kevin wrote:
> > * Package name : libkysdk-base
> >Version : 1.0.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libkysdk-system":
* Package name : libkysdk-system
Version : 2.0.0-1
Upstream contact : Zhikai Chen
* URL : https://gitee.com/openkylin/libkysdk-system
*
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libkysdk-base":
* Package name : libkysdk-base
Version : 1.0.1-1
Upstream contact : Zhikai Chen
* URL : https://gitee.com/openkylin/libkysdk-base
* Licens
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ukui-wallpapers"
* Package name: ukui-wallpapers
Version : 20.04.3-1
Upstream Author : handsome_feng
* URL : https://www.ukui.org
* License : CC-BY-
ve I am
sufficiently familiar with its development and code base to maintain
this package.
I've made the package, and uploaded it to mentors.debian.net (see above
dget/webpage links).
Please let me know how I can improve!
Thanks,
Kevin Murray
s...@kdmurray.id.au
I'm an FSF member -- He
architectures
* Point to new homepage in control file (Closes: #724277)
* Revorked debian/rules
* Solved possible problem with postrm script (Closes: #724247)
I would appreciate if someone could upload the package.
Regards,
Kevin Bortis
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
>
ploaded to debian mentors.
Sorry for the inconvenience and additional work.
@ Boris Pek: Thank you for the tip.
Regards
Kevin
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Boris Pek wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
>>>> The package was not yet uploaded into Debian.
>>>> - The package nu
to answer.
Thanks in advance
Kevin Bortis
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 8:46 PM, Anton Gladky wrote:
> Hi Kevin,
>
> thanks for working on the package. Generally it looks
> good and almost ready for uploading. Some minor notes:
>
> - Remove Readme.Debian, it is useless.
Done
&g
/wermut/musl
The repository follows the guideline found under
https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit
Thanks in advance
Kevin Bortis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arch
an upcomming Debian project which could help
implementing a new parallel, non-official, community driven build
infrastructure called debile (formerly know as debuild.me).
https://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-debile/ It is planed that
debile could potentially implement something like PPA's.
ound under
https://wiki.debian.org/PackagingWithGit
Regards,
Kevin Bortis
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/CALONj1c0Ka1E78J0mTymKcnAjmB
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "novoht"
Package name: novoht
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Kevin Brandstatter
URL : Https://github.com/kev40293/NoVoHT
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 09:15:20AM +1000, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:26:30AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 01:22:55AM -0400, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> >>On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 11:29:47PM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> >>&
uilddeps: Unmet build dependencies: scons libdbus-glib-1-dev (>=
0.76) libgtk2.0-dev (>= 2.12) liblua5.1-0-dev (>= 5.1) libboost-dev
libexpat1-dev lemon flex
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: Build dependencies/conflicts unsatisfied; aborting.
dpkg-buildpackage: warning: (Use -d flag to over
On Oct 5, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
We probably should do a better job of identifying these packages and
responding to the RFS to tell people that it's of questionable
importance (or clearly no importance) and then channeling them into
assistance to Debian that is of greater importa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qodem".
* Package name: qodem
Version : 0.3.0-1
Upstream Author : Kevin Lamonte
* URL : http://qodem.sourceforge.net
* License : GPLv2+
Section : comm
It builds these binary packa
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qodem".
* Package name: qodem
Version : 0.2.1-1
Upstream Author : Kevin Lamonte
* URL : http://qodem.sourceforge.net
* License : GPLv2+
Section : comm
It builds these binary packa
sitory: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/q/qodem/qodem_0.2.0-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Kevin Lamonte
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.o
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qodem".
* Package name: qodem
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Kevin Lamonte
* URL : http://qodem.sourceforge.net
* License : GPLv2+
Section : comm
It builds these binary packa
(Sorry, I meant to send to the mailing list...)
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire <
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:19:29PM -0600, Kevin Lamonte wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "qodem".
* Package name: qodem
Version : 0.2.0-1
Upstream Author : Kevin Lamonte
* URL : http://qodem.sourceforge.net
* License : GPLv2+
Section : comm
It builds these binary packa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[Apologies if I've screwed threading]
Thanks all for your input. I have closed the bug, and if its
re-opened I intend to tag as wontfix.
cheers
Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mail
to
remember to adjust the mozart-stdlib too.
Any suggestions? anything else? anywhere else I should be asking?
(e.g. maybe on debian-release).
Thanks for your help,
Kevin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&quo
spost is not currently in Debian unstable, you should also file
an ITP; see this URL:
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-newpackage
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://www.starplot.org/
WWW: http://people.debian.org/~kmccarty/
GPG:
exceptions like /tmp)
* Interactivity
None of these are guaranteed to be available on the buildds. (Although
minimal interactivity could be scripted with expect or some such.)
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://www.starplot.org/
WWW: http://people.debian.o
tilus-share-(.*)\.tar\.gz
uscan warning: In watchfile
/home/kevin/tmp/nautilis-share/nautilus-share-0.7.2/debian/watch,
reading webpage http://gentoo.ovibes.net/nautilus-share/ failed: 500
Internal
Server Error
2. When I build the package and dh_shlibdeps is run, it generates
quite
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:34:48PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote..
> Rhinote was sponsored by Kevin Coyner (thanks!), but beef is still
> in need of an upload.
>
> The updated package, which can be obtained with
>
> dget http://www.kiyuko.org/debian/beef_0.0.6-2.ds
bashism-in-maintainer-script preinst:18 'kill -9'
W: rrdcollect: copyright-without-copyright-notice
Please clean out the cruft in debian/rules.
debian/watch file should be version 3.
Homepage should no longer be in the extended description. It has its
own field now.
Those are comments a
t;
> In case it did, forgive me for the duplicate.
Uploaded. Thanks for your work.
Kevin
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 04:45:24PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani
> > wrote..
> >
> > > So apparently the different md5sum is due to the fact the
> > > upstream tar
r me to grab and I'll rebuild, sign and
upload.
>From there we should be good.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r me to grab and I'll rebuild, sign and
upload.
From there we should be good.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
am's file and your .orig.tar.gz file
do not match. This needs to be addressed.
My apologies as I should have spotted this earlier.
Let me know when fixed and I'll upload.
Thanks,
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:07:44PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote..
>
> OK, I've updated it. Let me know if copyright is better now.
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rcalc/rcalc_0.5.0-1.3.dsc
Looks good.
Uploaded.
Nice work and many thanks.
Kevin
--
Ke
gh dpatch or quilt. I know this is an NMU and
being unobtrusive is important, but there are quite a few
upstream source code changes which I think would be better off
in a patch system.
I'd be willing to upload once these are addressed.
Regards,
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner Gn
want to re-submit a separate RFS to this
list for beef only.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Francisco García wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.1-14
> of my package "gliese".
For the benefit of debian-mentors, I'm writing to mention that I have
now uploaded this also.
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty &l
upload gliese as
soon as I hear back about one minor thing.
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
WWW: http://www.starplot.org/
WWW: http://people.debian.org/~kmccarty/
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ee
http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wyrd.html
for an example.
Please correct these and I'll upload.
Thanks for your work.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 04:02:06PM -0500, Barry deFreese wrote..
> Thanks. I'm aware of those. I didn't think it was a good idea to
> change the package name on an NMU?
Uploaded.
Thanks for your work. You put some time in on this one.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key
uick glance. Please have a look, revise where
appropriate, and I'll upload.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
till use Apps, which is now Applications. See:
http://www.us.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/menu.html/ch3.html#s3.5
This actually generates a lintian warning which i'm surprised
you didn't pick up on:
W: drpython: menu-item-uses-apps-section /usr/share/menu/drpytho
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 07:04:31PM +0200, Joachim Reichel wrote..
>
> An updated package is at
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/n/normalize-audio/normalize-audio_0.7.7-2.dsc
Nice work. Uploaded.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
De
to upstream.
Other than that, looking O.K. although I'm unable to build it right
now because pbuilder can't seem to pull down the packages:
libvorbis0a
libvorbisenc2
libvorbisfile3
from the ftp.us.debian.org archives. I'll try again in a little bit.
Regards,
Ke
k, and that that system had normalize installed and
is still using it. Just wondering how long it makes sense to keep
Conflicts/Replaces statements for packages no longer in the
archives
Regards,
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ilding packages to be uploaded
into the archives, it's a good idea to keep your build system
up-to-date.
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
built the package and ran lintian on it and
got:
W: tesseract source: debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error line 32
Not a serious error and easily corrected, but nevertheless it bugs
me to see RFS's that say they are lintian clean when they are not.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key:
0:
error: missing charset command
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
s in upstream.
Have you tried to contact the upstream authors to see if they care
about the project and making it publically available again? If not,
perhaps you want to take over upstream and host it at SF or
someplace like that?
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSU
listed for metacam, and was not able to download a source copy.
Do you have a different webpage for downloading the source?
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
iff files doesn't show anything
new in that respect.
Otherwise looks fine.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
te 2004 vs 2005.
I'm a bit picky, but I like to see all unnecessary whitespace and
extra double space lines removed from all files. Most of your
debian/ files still have extraneous whitespace in them.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
just to be safe, could someone
have a peak and share any thoughts/comments?
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/csstidy/csstidy_1.4-1.dsc
Thanks
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
bian/watch. You only need 2
lines in that file.
You need to clean up the debian/copyright file. See the package
csstidy for an example.
Address these items and we'll take another look at it.
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
does strip in the
Makefile. Aside from editing the Makefile using dpatch, is there
anything else that is easily done to correct this? I know this seems
straightforward, but I just wanted to ask before I start editing
upstream where before it was left untouched.
Thanks.
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key:
php4-cgi and now just on
php5-cgi?
Just want to make sure.
Thanks.
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fix into
> > stable.
> You meant: testing, not unstable.
Yes, you are correct.
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ilder stable
and pbuilder unstable. It is lintian/linda clean in both cases.
The package can be found at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libphp-phpmailer/libphp-phpmailer_1.73-4.dsc
Many thanks,
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
be able to get
names correct.
I favor #2 as it does seem to be a bug in python. I found the
following regarding the bug:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg03007.html
So just looking for a little guidance in case I missed something
before I proceed.
Thanks
Kevin
--
Kevin Co
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 17:26, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> In order to ensure that upgrades run smoothly, the easiest possibility
>> (maybe the only possibility) is for you to also add the epoch, changing
>> the version number on your packages to 1:3.
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 15:12, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> Do you plan to post a final 3.6.2-1 version for me to build and upload?
>> Or shall I just bump the version number in the 3.6.2-1~pre8 changelog to
>> 3.6.2-1, then build and upload that?
&
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Thursday 05 April 2007 12:47, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> One minor point is that the orig.tar.gz of a source package that was
>> modified for Debian (even just to repack it) should contain a directory
>> named
>> netcdf-3.6.2.orig
>>
Hi Warren!
Warren Turkal wrote:
> Kevin,
>
> Today is your lucky day. I addressed all of your bullet points along with a
> fun bonus. The new revision (1~pre7) is at [1]. I now think that 1~pre7 is
> ready for experimental after a revision change to 1.
Thanks for addressi
Warren Turkal wrote:
> Kevin and other interested parties,
>
> New netcdf packages are up at [1]. All issues are fixed other than the
> netcdf-doc related issue.
>
> [1]http://www.penguintechs.org/~wt/debian/netcdf/
Hi Warren,
Let me preface this email by saying that all
uces a myprogram.1 man page.
Obviously there are no shortage of other ways of writing a man page.
This has just seemed easy enough for me.
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 March 2007 17:47, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> * possibility to build an arch:all documentation package
>
> The maintainer is encouraging the use of the pre-built docs instead of
> building them from the texinfo sources. Would there be a
omething other than "netcdf-doc" since various packages
(sbuild, apt) don't deal well with binary packages of the same name as
an unrelated source package [0].
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-policy/2007/01/msg00031.html
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
in
debian/control.
(note: they would instead be in Build-Depends-Indep if you create an
arch: all netcdf-doc package *and* can work out how to get CDBS to
generate the docs only in the binary-indep target.)
One last thing: please install RELEASE_NOTES as the upstream changelog
("changelog.g
project name that is guaranteed to not be
previously registered.
Am I blind and missing something real basic, or does alioth have a
problem at the moment?
Thanks
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> On Friday 02 February 2007 19:10, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> One cautionary note: If you go with 3.6.2~beta6 for an upstream version,
>> your build directory will be named netcdf-3.6.2~beta6. ÂI remember that
>> some libtool versions don't like directory na
#x27;s libtool [1,2].
[0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00825.html
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00828.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/09/msg00830.html
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department
WWW:
to be in unstable, there
will hopefully be no wait time :-)
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
d have both package1 and package2 Depend upon that.
That would save disk space on the Debian mirrors, and also save
bandwidth for people who install package1 and then later change their
minds and want package2 instead (or vice versa).
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Phys
se holding off on the upload until the Etch release.
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
there was some doubt...
I hope this didn't come across as nitpicky, just wanted to make sure
things were clear for anyone new to Debian packaging who might be
reading the lists.
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department
WWW: http://ww
debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libphp-phpmailer/libphp-phpmailer_1.73-3.dsc
I would appreciate it if someone uploaded this package for me.
Best regards,
Kevin Coyner
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
D
he copyright to:
Copyright (C) 1999, 2000 Eazel, Inc.
Authors: Ramiro Estrugo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
as found in the file:
auth-dialog/gnome-two-password-dialog.c
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
eep track of (or try to prevent) ABI
incompatibilities. Hence the soname changes with every new version. I
can see why this behavior would be discouraged :-)
(Yes, I know Gnome/GTK+ doesn't have this issue; it was just a general
statistical observation.)
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:36:28 -0800 "Kevin B. McCarty"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Upstream of my library (Cernlib maintainers) only ships static
>> libraries, and the shared library support is hacked in by me. So I
>> have com
e:
> On Mon, 08 Jan 2007 11:19:40 -0800
> "Kevin B. McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have a dumb library ABI question. Suppose I maintain a library
>> libfoo.so that has public functions A(), B() and C(). Now there is a
&g
regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department
WWW: http://www.princeton.edu/~kmccarty/Princeton University
GPG: public key ID 4F83C751 Princeton, NJ 08544
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
fortran.h somewhere (maybe at /usr/include/netcdf/cfortran.h or
something similar)? How does a Fortran compilation using libnetcdff
ensure that the compiler picks up that file (which it should do to be
consistent) and not /usr/include/cfortran.h ?
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PRO
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Thursday 14 December 2006 11:09, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> 1) Why did you make the libnetcdf++3 package into a dummy package and
>> move the C++ bindings into the libnetcdf3 package? ÂIf the soname of the
>> C++ package needs to evolve faster than
Warren Turkal wrote:
> On Thursday 14 December 2006 11:09, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
>> This is weird: if you install your new packages of netcdf, the existing
>> kst-plugins package (from Sid) on your system should automatically pick
>> up the new libnetcdf_c++.so.3 library
Kevin Coyner wrote:
> During a recent upgrade of my Debian Sid box, I noticed the
> following changelog entry:
>
> f-spot (0.2.2-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low
>
> * Update to 0.2.2 upstream
>
> Perhaps I've already missed a discussion on this. If so, I'd
&
flicted against.
Some of these issues could have been caught by comparing the contents of
the netcdf binary packages in Sid and your new packages. I find that
debdiff is a really useful tool for such comparisons, though of course YMMV.
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
, then
are their guidelines or policy statements somewhere that explain
how and when Ubuntu releases are incorporated into Debian?
I maintain a handful of Debian packages and am genuinely curious
about this and am not trying to start a heated debate.
Thanks,
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG
FORTRAN libraries, when possible, be
compiled with g77 for the moment.
If netcdf does not have any functions returning REAL (single-precision)
or COMPLEX, maybe building netcdf with gfortran is OK though.
best regards,
--
Kevin B. McCarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Physics Department
WWW:
trib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/s/sitebar/sitebar_3.3.8-3.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Happy holidays,
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
is a consensus on this matter, should this be documented
> somewhere (policy, dev-ref) and bugs be filed against the packages not
> complying to this policy?
Maybe see what the Debian maintainer of devhelp thinks? Also, what does
he think about the possibility of patching devhelp for Debian to l
n the
localhost. This seems to be the approach of many similar packages
like drupal, diogenes. O.k.
So if mysql-server is a Recommends:, then running piuparts will
always fail. Is this just a limitation of piuparts?
Thanks,
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.
#x27;m correct I'll file a bug. If
I'm wrong I'd like to know how this works.
Thanks
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
r etch now and I hope to have more time
again on January.
Regards,
Kevin
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2006/08/msg4.html
--
publickey 2048R/0AFDFB19 available at:
http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x1BF55C710AFDFB19
fingerprint: 542B 1378 04AA AF1F 57
ebian/compat to 5.
* Updated debian/watch to version 3.
* Updated debian/copyright with correct FSF address and to proper Debian
policy.
* Wrote and added a basic man page.
* Converted menu icon from .png to .xpm format.
* Added homepage to debian/control.
Many thanks in advance!
K
bian/pool/main/p/pyexcelerator/pyexcelerator_0.6.3a-1.dsc
I would appreciate it if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Kevin Coyner
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pyexcelerator/pyexcelerator_0.6.3a-1.dsc
I would appreciate it if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Kevin Coyner
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key
pload this package for me.
Many thanks,
Kevin Coyner
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.4.1-2.dsc
Thanks is advance for reviewing the package and hopefully uploading
it.
Kevin
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rpl/rpl_1.5.4.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Many thanks
Kevin Coyner
--
Kevin Coyner GnuPG key: 1024D/8CE11941
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
1 - 100 of 275 matches
Mail list logo
