Re: Depend on emacsen, but also mailcrypt if emacs20

2000-02-05 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Sat, Feb 05, 2000 at 05:23:33AM +0100, Bjoern Brill wrote: > > I have a package that depends on emacsen, and > > works just fine with xemacs, but if it is > > installed with emacs20, it additionally needs > > mailcrypt. How would I create a depends-line > >

Depend on emacsen, but also mailcrypt if emacs20

2000-02-04 Thread Tommi Virtanen
(See bug#49560 for background) I have a package that depends on emacsen, and works just fine with xemacs, but if it is installed with emacs20, it additionally needs mailcrypt. How would I create a depends-line in such a case? I don't think grouping

Re: shlib dependencies

2000-01-30 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 09:28:11PM -0500, Ben Darnell wrote: > > > The package is correctly depending on libgl1 instead of mesag3-glide2. > > > The problem is that linking against the mesag3-glide2 version of > > > libGL.so.1 pulls in libvga.so.1, which causes the package to depend on > > > svgalib

Re: tcl8.0/tk8.0 and tcl8.2/tk8.2 at the same time?

1999-11-13 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Thu, Nov 11, 1999 at 04:06:55PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > > Please consider adding a tk8.2/tcl8.2 dependency. > > I'm not actually sure how to, and what that means. > > Can a package work with both 8.0 and 8.2? How? > Well, gcc can work with both as a part of building packages fo

tcl8.0/tk8.0 and tcl8.2/tk8.2 at the same time?

1999-11-11 Thread Tommi Virtanen
[Was Re: re. http://www.debian.org/Packages/unstable/admin/lavaps.html] On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 11:43:42AM -0500, Gabor Liptak wrote: > Please consider adding a tk8.2/tcl8.2 dependency. I'm not actually sure how to, and what that means. Can a package work with both 8.0 and 8.2? Ho

Re: exec ./configure ${1+"$@"}

1999-07-08 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Wed, Jul 07, 1999 at 03:48:49PM +0200, Sami Dalouche wrote: > I've seen this line in the dh_configure file of the mutt package and I'm > asking some questions about this : > > 1 ) Is the exec necessary ? What does it stand for ? It executes the configure script, as opposed to mearly ca

Re: Bug #23053 (was Re: fix for frozen)

1998-06-05 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Fri, Jun 05, 1998 at 04:01:08PM +0200, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > > Now correct me if I'm wrong... but a package shouldn't go messing with > > permissions of files that are so important without the user saying "I > > want this". True? > Right! My fault (or maybe Linux/Linus, I don't know. If I,