Re: RFS: swedish (updated ispell and spell packages)

at responsibility as well. > > Okay. I will try and get some native speakers involved - I live in > Sweden so that should not be so hard. :) That would be great. Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Toedter | The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is Hamburg, Germany | probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: RFS: swedish (updated ispell and spell packages)

se the Swedish characters from the last changelog (from version 1.4.4) in the names, you will then get an UTF-8 encoded changelog. I didn't see a new upload on mentors.d.n, so I couldn't comment on the Debian part. Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Toedter | Your lucky number is 3

Re: RFS: swedish (updated ispell and spell packages)

encoded in ISO-8859-1, using special characters for Swedish. Therefore, the conversion from ISO-8859-1 to UTF-8 should include those characters as well, making it "real" UTF-8 instead of ASCII. Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Toedter | "Time wounds all heels." -- Groucho Marx Hambu

Re: RFS: swedish (updated ispell and spell packages)

ish words make > extensive use of their three separate, Swedish-only vowels so this > might be a challenge. I think that's a misunderstanding. I don't want you to change the contents of the word lists, those are fine with the ISO-8859-1 encoding. What I meant are the file and directo

Re: RFS: swedish (updated ispell and spell packages)

uot; and so on, however, I don't know if this is possible for Swedish characters. After those changes, I'll sponsor your upload. Thanks for taking care of that package! Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Toedter | Recursion: n., see Recursion. Hamburg, Germany | signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Building a package for experimental

r approach to me. How are other people handling this? Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Toedter | An optimist believes we live in the best of all Hamburg, Germany | possible worlds. A pessimist is sure of it! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: error uploading package to debian.mentors.net

ile, so the Debian revision of your package must be included. Currently, your naming scheme suggests a Debian native package, which is wrong. Instead, your .diff.gz and .dsc files should be named like this: localizator_0.2-1.diff.gz localizator_0.2-1.dsc Regards, Tobias -- Tobias Toedter | Hurew

Re: How adopt an package ?

On Tuesday 05 April 2005 17:48, José Carlos do Nascimento wrote: > I read this. but I didnt understand. > Send I an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] emailwith subject: > ITA, or send I an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ? Hi, you need to send your e-mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. In the message bo

Re: what's a sponsor ?

On Friday 01 April 2005 01:48, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:21:23PM +0300, George Danchev wrote: > > On Thursday 31 March 2005 23:08, Florian Ernst wrote: [...] > > > links to > > >

Re: What to do with the bugs of a removed package?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Sunday 30 May 2004 23:06, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 21:37]: > > I'm not quite sure what to do now, because the stable release of > > course still contains the p

What to do with the bugs of a removed package?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, recently, I filed a bug against ftp.d.o and asked for the removal of the package onshore-timesheet. That program is dead upstream, the Debian package has been orphaned and removed from testing, and it has several open bugs (including one RC).

Re: What to do with the bugs of a removed package?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Sunday 30 May 2004 23:06, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > * Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-05-30 21:37]: > > I'm not quite sure what to do now, because the stable release of > > course still contains the p

What to do with the bugs of a removed package?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, recently, I filed a bug against ftp.d.o and asked for the removal of the package onshore-timesheet. That program is dead upstream, the Debian package has been orphaned and removed from testing, and it has several open bugs (including one RC).

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wednesday 28 January 2004 18:45, Alexander Bürger wrote: > > Argh. This is just plainly _wrong_. Read policy and developers reference > > about versioning what -2.1 actually means... > > I'm sorry, but I cannot find anything negative about 2.1

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, On Wednesday 28 January 2004 18:45, Alexander Bürger wrote: > > Argh. This is just plainly _wrong_. Read policy and developers reference > > about versioning what -2.1 actually means... > > I'm sorry, but I cannot find anything negative about 2.1

Buildds fail on quite a few architectures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just prepared a new version for one of my packages, worker. I managed to build it for i386 yesterday without any problems in an up-to-date sid chroot (with pbuilder). My sponsor was able to build the package as well, so he did the upload for

Buildds fail on quite a few architectures

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I just prepared a new version for one of my packages, worker. I managed to build it for i386 yesterday without any problems in an up-to-date sid chroot (with pbuilder). My sponsor was able to build the package as well, so he did the upload for

Re: RFS: qbrew -- a homebrewer's recipe calculator

On Tuesday 29 April 2003 01:22, Roger Leigh wrote: > I have a small GTK+ 2.0 tool > (http://www.whinlatter.uklinux.net/gtk/ogcalc.c) for calculating %ABV > and original gravity from present gravity and refractive index. You > are welcome to take this code if you wish. Thanks a lot. I will take a

Re: RFS: qbrew -- a homebrewer's recipe calculator

On Monday 28 April 2003 20:54, Joshua Kwan wrote: > Eh? apt-get install joshk? ;) Oops. Sorry... I'm not a native speaker, so it read a little bit different than what I was trying to say... but then again, wouldn't it be nice to always have a fresh and clean version of yourself? ;-) Anyways, t

RFS: qbrew -- a homebrewer's recipe calculator

Hello mentors, I would like anyone of you to sponsor my newly created package of qbrew. It is already included in debian but was orphaned a few days ago, so I decided to adopt it. Since this is my first package, there might be some flaws in it -- although it's lintian and linda clean and insta