On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, javi wrote:
> you run the program it claims that a perl module called Cache.pm it's
> not present, OK I have installed manually getting from the CPAN, when
> it's installed again claim for another perl module and so on, so this is
> awfull,and more important, when a perl module
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, javi wrote:
> you run the program it claims that a perl module called Cache.pm it's
> not present, OK I have installed manually getting from the CPAN, when
> it's installed again claim for another perl module and so on, so this is
> awfull,and more important, when a perl modul
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
> building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
> prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
> also is what I distribute elsewhere.
On Wed, 5 Sep 2001, peter karlsson wrote:
> How do I get dpkg-buildpackage not to re-build the source tarball when
> building a native package? No matter what I do, it rebuilds it, which
> prevents me from keeping the tarball I created from my CVS tree, which
> also is what I distribute elsewhere
do:
# apt-get install hello
# apt-get install hello-debhelper
# apt-get source hello
# apt-get source hello-debhelper
and have a look at those packages.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux
do:
# apt-get install hello
# apt-get install hello-debhelper
# apt-get source hello
# apt-get source hello-debhelper
and have a look at those packages.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ilia Lobsanov wrote:
> Is there an advocate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada that can sign my key?
http://www.google.com/search?q=toronto%20debian
?
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole
On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Ilia Lobsanov wrote:
> Is there an advocate in Toronto, Ontario, Canada that can sign my key?
http://www.google.com/search?q=toronto%20debian
?
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePol
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> I have something wrong in my package(poedit) related to package name.
> Among thousands of debian packages, potool has the same command name - poedit
> - as my package command name. The source is absoultely different!
> In this case, should be the pack
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Yooseong Yang wrote:
> I have something wrong in my package(poedit) related to package name.
> Among thousands of debian packages, potool has the same command name - poedit - as
>my package command name. The source is absoultely different!
> In this case, should be the pack
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I maintain a package wich is console based and receives an url
> to download as argument (at least).
>
> I did not make an item for it on Debian menu because it's no
> good to add a default URL ;)
>
> I was wondering about creating a script that
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> I maintain a package wich is console based and receives an url
> to download as argument (at least).
>
> I did not make an item for it on Debian menu because it's no
> good to add a default URL ;)
>
> I was wondering about creating a script that
Tag the bug with "moreinfo" and/or "unreproducible", ask the people if
they can still reproduce the bugs, give them some time and then close
them. Check "Developers' information regarding the bug processing system"
at bugs.debian.org (the info in doc-debian is out of sync, a bugreport
is filled).
*
Tag the bug with "moreinfo" and/or "unreproducible", ask the people if
they can still reproduce the bugs, give them some time and then close
them. Check "Developers' information regarding the bug processing system"
at bugs.debian.org (the info in doc-debian is out of sync, a bugreport
is filled).
If you got some useful answers on this I would be interested as well to
hear them, since a package of mine is stuck in unstable because the
autobuilders are not catching up
*t
Tomas Pospisek
Sour
If you got some useful answers on this I would be interested as well to
hear them, since a package of mine is stuck in unstable because the
autobuilders are not catching up
*t
Tomas Pospisek
Sou
Have a look at the afbackup package which does exactly this.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://sourcepole.ch
Elestastrasse 18, 7310
Have a look at the afbackup package which does exactly this.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://sourcepole.ch
Elestastrasse 18, 7310
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Some weeks ago I received Bug#96254 on one of my package: ocaml-xstr,
> the problem is a build failure on a m68k machine. The reason is that a
> package needed in ocaml-xstr compilation named ocaml-findlib, does not
> work well on a m68k architecture
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 02:04:33PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > The quick and ugly way is of course to build a new debian package
> > that excludes m68k from the supported architectures.
>
> That's not very n
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Christoph Baumann wrote:
> [..] have [..] /usr/lib/X11/app-defaults [..] moved to
> /etc/X11/app-defaults?
yes.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutio
On Thu, 7 Jun 2001, Christoph Baumann wrote:
> [..] have [..] /usr/lib/X11/app-defaults [..] moved to
> /etc/X11/app-defaults?
yes.
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Soluti
On Wed, 6 Jun 2001, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 06, 2001 at 02:04:33PM +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > The quick and ugly way is of course to build a new debian package
> > that excludes m68k from the supported architectures.
>
> That's not very n
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> Some weeks ago I received Bug#96254 on one of my package: ocaml-xstr,
> the problem is a build failure on a m68k machine. The reason is that a
> package needed in ocaml-xstr compilation named ocaml-findlib, does not
> work well on a m68k architectur
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> I'm packaging mp3kult (see #94999), and having a bit of trouble to make
> a perfect debconfized postinst for it. I already have a few nice tests
> that ensure a more or less smooth installation, but some other tests
> I plan to include would require MyS
On Fri, 18 May 2001, Carlos Laviola wrote:
> I'm packaging mp3kult (see #94999), and having a bit of trouble to make
> a perfect debconfized postinst for it. I already have a few nice tests
> that ensure a more or less smooth installation, but some other tests
> I plan to include would require My
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> So, before submitting a bug, check if it hasn't been reported yet.
As a note: Use reportbug which will automatically show you the bugs that
were allready reported against the package you are fillig against.
*t
---
On Wed, 16 May 2001, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> So, before submitting a bug, check if it hasn't been reported yet.
As a note: Use reportbug which will automatically show you the bugs that
were allready reported against the package you are fillig against.
*t
--
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2001-05-08 at 11:21:30 AM (+0200), T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > AFAIK there's no netcdfg neither in the current testing release nor in
> >^
> > unstable. That is there's no net
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Torsten Werner wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2001-05-08 at 11:21:30 AM (+0200), T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > AFAIK there's no netcdfg neither in the current testing release nor in
> >^
> > unstable. That is there's
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Torsten Werner wrote:
> some time ago I have uploaded a new xmgr package (4.1.2-6). The
> update-excuses file on ftp-master tells me, that this version will be
> installed if it does not depend on other buggy packages. As far as I can
> see, xmgr-4.1.2-6 does not depend on any
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Torsten Werner wrote:
> some time ago I have uploaded a new xmgr package (4.1.2-6). The
> update-excuses file on ftp-master tells me, that this version will be
> installed if it does not depend on other buggy packages. As far as I can
> see, xmgr-4.1.2-6 does not depend on any
A package of mine requires the libstlport library. This library installs
as:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.a
-> libstlport_gcc.a
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.so
-> libstlport
A package of mine requires the libstlport library. This library installs
as:
$ ls -l /usr/lib/libstlport*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 16 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.a ->
libstlport_gcc.a
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root 20 Apr 3 12:54 /usr/lib/libstlport.so ->
libstlpor
Nazdar,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Karel Gardas wrote:
> I have one question regarding creating debian package. Do I need
> unstable debian for this task? I'm asking because I run potato now and (if
> possible) wouldn't like to switch to unstable.
No, you definitively don't need to run unstable. It's
Nazdar,
On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Karel Gardas wrote:
> I have one question regarding creating debian package. Do I need
> unstable debian for this task? I'm asking because I run potato now and (if
> possible) wouldn't like to switch to unstable.
No, you definitively don't need to run unstable. It's
A user reported to me that he can't find libstl for unstable. I checked
and it was available on my mirror and I told him so thinking maybe it was
a problem with pools and the package being somewhere in the middle of a
transfer. Upon which he later reported that it even wasn't available on
the main
A user reported to me that he can't find libstl for unstable. I checked
and it was available on my mirror and I told him so thinking maybe it was
a problem with pools and the package being somewhere in the middle of a
transfer. Upon which he later reported that it even wasn't available on
the main
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> And to repeat what many people said, you can help debian without having an
> account, you can fix bugs, send in patches (not bugreports, but fixes...),
> trace down problems, even get sponsored uploads. What more do you need to
> help improve deb
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Does this mean I can never become a maintainer?
Just wait here
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://sou
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> And to repeat what many people said, you can help debian without having an
> account, you can fix bugs, send in patches (not bugreports, but fixes...),
> trace down problems, even get sponsored uploads. What more do you need to
> help improve de
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> You have not yet proven your patience, which is next in the DAM process.
You have read Kafka, haven't you? I don't remember whether the guards
were saying something about Debian being behind those closed doors?
Just another DAMned waiting at th
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> Does this mean I can never become a maintainer?
Just wait here
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source Solutions
http://so
On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> You have not yet proven your patience, which is next in the DAM process.
You have read Kafka, haven't you? I don't remember whether the guards
were saying something about Debian being behind those closed doors?
Just another DAMned waiting at t
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I will sponsor you, if no one else has volenteered yet.
Ueiii! Yes, I accept gladly. Thanks!
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source So
On Tue, 17 Oct 2000, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> I will sponsor you, if no one else has volenteered yet.
Ueiii! Yes, I accept gladly. Thanks!
*t
Tomas Pospisek
SourcePole - Linux & Open Source S
I'm in the new-maintainer-queue, this is my applicant's admission test
;-). You can find it at:
http://sourcepole.ch/sources/software/xxdiff
I'd be grateful to find a sponsor so that it get's uploaded and I can
start recieving bugreports (arghhh.).
:-)
*t
I'm in the new-maintainer-queue, this is my applicant's admission test
;-). You can find it at:
http://sourcepole.ch/sources/software/xxdiff
I'd be grateful to find a sponsor so that it get's uploaded and I can
start recieving bugreports (arghhh.).
:-)
*t
---
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Michael Weber wrote:
> How about
>
> AC_PROG_CXX
> AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$GXX = xyes)
>
> (Cf. autoconf manual)
Wow! Muchas gracias,
*t
Tomas Pospisek
On Thu, 14 Sep 2000, Michael Weber wrote:
> How about
>
> AC_PROG_CXX
> AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$GXX = xyes)
>
> (Cf. autoconf manual)
Wow! Muchas gracias,
*t
Tomas Pospisek
xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++
(which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++.
The line in configure.in is:
AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++)
Does anybody else, that has packaged a autoconfigured c++ package have a
simp
xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++
(which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++.
The line in configure.in is:
AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++)
Does anybody else, that has packaged a autoconfigured c++ package have a
sim
On Wed, 24 May 2000, Justin Penney wrote:
> lynx is nearly always installed and used by default in many scripts. (e.g.
> dhs.org update scripts etc.)
It's just that lynx is a viewer. wget is a page fetch-program and for that
reason "might" be better adapted for the task.
*t
-
Isn't it possible to use wget or wwwoffle instead?
I'm using wwwoffle like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/4wwwoffle
#!/bin/sh -e
echo "wwwoffle: start" >> /var/log/mylog
# -gi also fetch images
# -gf also fetch frames
/usr/bin/wwwoffle -gi -gf /etc/wwwoffle.html
# put wwwoffle
54 matches
Mail list logo
