On Wed, 2023-08-16 at 12:28 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-08-13 at 11:51 +, John Scott wrote:
>
> > Because carl9170 is largely under the GPL and we're obligated to distribute complete sources for our binaries, I've set Static-Built- Using on both gcc (because
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Dear all,
I have uploaded a new version of carl9170fw to mentors.debian.net that
represents my very best work. Please review it carefully. Building it requires
the just-uploaded libnewlib-sh-elf-dev version 3.3.0+8. I tend to ramble and
I've already written at great
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Control: block 1026335 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version : 7
* License : various
*
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
I've discovered an issue with how the Built-Using fields are generated.
Specifically, because gcc-sh-elf does not set a Built-Using field for Newlib,
and because of the way the libnewlib-sh-elf-dev binary package is currently
versioned, there is no way to precisely tel
Control: retitle -1 RFS: carl9170fw [ITP] -- firmware for AR9170 USB wireless
adapters
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "carl9170fw":
* Package name : carl9170fw
Version : 1.9.9-450-gad1c721-1
Upstream contact : linux-wirel...@vger.kernel.org
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version : 6
* License : many, but primarily GPL 3+ for GCC and permissive
licenses for Newlib
* Vcs :
https:
;
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Galaxy
>>
>>
>>
>> ---- Original message
>> From: Victor Westerhuis
>> Date: 2/26/23 17:56 (GMT-05:00)
>> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org, Barry Scott ,
>> Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی
>
> On 26 Feb 2023, at 20:42, Victor Westerhuis wrote:
>
> Barry Scott mailto:ba...@barrys-emacs.org>> schreef
> op 26 februari 2023 21:36:20 CET:
>>
>>
>>> On 26 Feb 2023, at 14:06, Danial Behzadi دانیال بهزادی
>>> <dani.be..
t installing into /usr not preventing install in $USER I
hope.
I think this is a major bug.
Barry
>
>
>
> در ۲۶ فوریهٔ ۲۰۲۳ ۱۰:۰۴:۲۰ (UTC)، Barry Scott نوشت:
>> I have been using the following to add useful python based commands to my
>> user locally:
>>
>>
I have been using the following to add useful python based commands to
my user locally:
$ python3 -m pip install --user
For install I get this:
$ python3 -m pip install --user colour-text
error: externally-managed-environment
× This environment is externally managed
╰─> To install Python pac
I found the pypi2deb package but it does not work.
For example:
$ py2dsp xml-preferences
/usr/bin/py2dsp:163: DeprecationWarning: There is no current event loop
loop = asyncio.get_event_loop()
E: py2dsp py2dsp:167: 'releases'
The problem is that its loading meta data from PyPI and thinks ther
On 02/01/2023 15:50, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Edit /etc/apt/sources.list to have the following contents:
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ unstable main contrib no
On 31/12/2022 22:49, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 12/31/22 23:39, Barry wrote:
This is where i need help understanding what i do to get that deb.
Wait for it to migrate to testing. Keep an eye on the excuses:
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/qscintilla2
Or install it from unstable in the
ld as part of the official Fedora
releases.
Here are my repos for example
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/barryascott/
Barry
On Saturday, December 31, 2022 10:30:44 AM MST Barry Scott wrote:
> How do I file a request to get QScintilla packaged for debian testing?
>
> There
How do I file a request to get QScintilla packaged for debian testing?
There is the python3-pyqt5 package, but the qt6 version is missing.
Barry
I have installed debian 11 (bullseye) but find that its missing packages
that I need for my software.
For example python3-pyqt6 is a must have. debian 11 only has pyqt5.
What do you recommend I do to be on a debian which has the newer packages?
What is the stability expectation of your recomme
Fedora
infra.
I'll try and get it working.
Barry
On Thursday, December 29, 2022 9:21:39 AM MST Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
On 12/29/22 06:02, Barry Scott wrote:
On Fedora/RHEL I would use mock to build a RPM from source to ensure
that I have the RPM spec file correctly written.
Mock en
On Fedora/RHEL I would use mock to build a RPM from source to ensure
that I have the RPM spec file correctly written.
Mock ensures that no packages in my dev machine are used to build the RPM.
What is the debian version of that tool?
Barry
On 27/12/2022 19:06, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2022 at 10:57:51AM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote:
Barry,
Figuring out how to package for Debian has a stiff learning curve (speaking as
someone
who is going through the process myself).
I have given up a number of times in the past
On 27/12/2022 12:49, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 27/12/22 a las 13:12, Ole Streicher escribió:
Santiago Vila writes:
If you don't have deb-src lines, they are the same as the usual deb
lines
except that they begin with deb-src.
Just curious: why are the deb line not used by default here?
The
On 27/12/2022 11:16, Ole Streicher wrote:
Hi Barry,
Barry Scott writes:
I am build my first Debian package for Barry's Emacs
(https:://barrys-emacs.org)
Aside from Santiagos technical tips: If you really want to contribute
your package to the Debian distribution, you should also have
On 27/12/2022 01:37, Santiago Vila wrote:
El 26/12/22 a las 16:28, Barry Scott escribió:
E: bemacs source: malformed-debian-changelog-version 8.9.3 (for
non-native) [debian/changelog:1]
It seems that the changelog issue is around lintian mandating a issue
to close?
I have no issue what do
I am build my first Debian package for Barry's Emacs (https:://barrys-emacs.org)
My build environment is Ubuntu 22.10.
There are some lintian errors that I do not know how to handler.
Now running lintian bemacs_8.9.3_amd64.changes ...
E: bemacs source: malformed-debian-changelog-version 8.9.3 (fo
Hi,
So, my package got auto-rejected. I talked to the FTP Masters, and
they'd much rather that a workaround be incorporated into my package
than them having to manually make it pass through. I've uploaded the
one-line change to mentors.debian.net; if you could upload it once more,
there shouldn't
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binutils-sh-elf":
* Package name : binutils-sh-elf
Version : 2 (this is a native so
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Control: block 994625 by -1
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org b...@debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "carl9170fw":
* Package name : carl9170fw
Version : 1.9.9-427-gecb68a7-1
Upstream
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 08:49 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I assume you're missing libreadline-dev from BuildDepends.
You are, of course, absolutely right. I forgot to build in a clean
environment. This has been fixed in a new upload to mentors.debian.net
and a build in a clean environme
Control: owner -1 glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
On Sun, 2022-12-18 at 08:09 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I can sponsor this upload.
Thanks so much! Please go ahead whenever you're ready.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors and fellow Electronics Team members,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version
Thanks for taking a look, Bastian. I believe the changes are
satisfactory now, except that after close inspection I found that those
files specified as being covered by the BSD-3-Clause license are still
covered by it. Please me know if I'm misunderstanding something.
signature.asc
Description:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-ath9k-htc-firmware":
* Package name : open-ath9k-htc-firmware
Version : 1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2
Upstream Author : ath9k_h
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version : 4
* License : various
* Vcs :
https://salsa.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-sup...@lists.debian.org
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Dear mentors and other interested parties,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your very detailed review of carl9170fw. I'm still making my
changes to the package and will give you a poke and remove the moreinfo
tag once I have an upload ready for re-review.
> I don't think udebs are needed for firmware packages, none of the ot
On Sat, 2022-01-08 at 16:54 +0100, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> (correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe that using Apache-2.0 libraries in
> GPL
> software is not allowed).
It depends on the version of the GPL at play. If it's GPL 3.0 (or
later), then Apache 2.0 is usually regarded as fully compatib
for compatibility, but hope to drop it
>> ASAP.
>>
>Is there a way to see what packages currently build-depend on this?
>
>This does not seem to be supported:
>$ apt-rdepends -r --build-depends dh-python-pep517
>E: Reverse build-dependencies are not supported
In the ubuntu-dev-tools package, reverse-depends -b $PACKAGE.
Scott K
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-ker...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors and Kernel Team,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "carl9170fw":
* Package name : carl9170fw
Version : 1.9.9-399-gcd480b9-1
Upstream Author : linux-wirel...@vger.ke
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Dear mentors and Electronics Team,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Version : 2 (this is a native package)
* License
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 12:24 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> So, do you want me to upload newlib or do you want Tobias to do it?
I think it would be more appropriate if you would. Just be sure to do
it to a delayed queue for a minimum of two weeks, and send a mail to
996552-d...@bu
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 12:07 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> What about the Salsa repository? Is it going to be updated?
I've sent a merge request, and in fact did so a long time ago before my
first NMU, but since the maintainers have been unresponsive it hasn't
gotten merged. The Git repo
On Fri, 2021-10-15 at 11:56 +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Are you planning to adopt the package?
Yes, I'm intending to salvage it and become the maintainer (the ITS is
#996432). I think I'll keep it under the umbrella of the Electronics
Team.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digit
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net,
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
Control: affects -1 src:newlib
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "newlib":
* Package name : newlib
Version : 3.3.0-1.2
Hi,
My question is more to do with the practical ramifications of an upload
than the legal ones, so I'm directing my query here rather than debian-
legal.
I'm packaging carl9170fw (which is already present in Debian main, but
not built from source yet), and this includes a header file called
ch9.
> I have no idea how we're going to address this. I think I'll file a bug
> and see if they're willing to revert as soon as I can identify all of
> the affected packages.
I've filed a bug and marked it as a blocker of this issue, but in the
admittedly short time since I filed it Wednesday I haven't
Hi Vincent,
I'm very glad to see that you've been working on this. From an initial
skim of your package, things look very good, and I'm more pleased to
see that you've based your work off of binutils-sh-elf and the
PackagingLessCommonBinutilsTargets guide.
About the build failure Adam had, I'm af
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net, nico...@debian.org
Control: block -1 by 985563
Control: block 986778 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gcc-sh-elf":
* Package name : gcc-sh-elf
Versio
Control: retitle -1 RFS: open-ath9k-htc-firmware/1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2
[RC] -- firmware for AR7010 and AR9271 USB wireless adapters
Thanks to the Reproducible Builds folks for notifying me, the current
package is FTBFS due to the Binutils 2.37 upload to unstable.
Fortunately my package alrea
Hello,
It seems that the upload of binutils-source 2.37 has broken my to-be-
uploaded package binutils-sh-elf; it worked fine with binutils-source
2.36. My package is available at
https://mentors.debian.net/package/binutils-sh-elf/
I'm looking for anyone that knows Autoconf wizardry to help sort
On Wed, 2021-06-09 at 17:07 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > * Friendly takeover back into the WebExt team.
>
> I can't find any documentation about that have been ACKed by the
> current maintainer. (CCing Jonas so that he can response/confirm, to
> put it on record that this is not an hijack…)
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 07:07 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> The Files-Excluded section is used by tools like uscan to strip files from the
> orig.tar. The formatted text just says that the field can extend over
> multiple
> lines, it does not mean its free text without meaning.
> TL;DR: I'm pretty s
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Tue, 08 Jun 2021 21:38:56 + John Scott
wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 07:52 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > > I haven't encountered the maintainer previously, but believe in
> > > good faith that these changes would be welcome and that
On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 07:52 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > I haven't encountered the maintainer previously, but believe in
> > good faith that these changes would be welcome and that the
> > LowThresholdNmu criterion are met by addressing a bug with
> > important severity. My interest in this bug,
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Mon, 2021-05-31 at 20:25 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> I've took a look at your package:
Awesome, thanks.
> - d/copyright:
> - The word "Comment:" went missing after the Files-Exlucded section
Hello,
I'm working on packaging gcc-sh-elf (ITP #986778) which provides not
just a cross C compiler, but also provides Newlib (the ISO C standard
library) and a simulator, which is a Wine-like wrapper that makes
running the binaries possible on a Debian machine. This seems like a
very good opportu
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for Newlib:
* Package name : newlib
Version : 3.3.0-1.1
Upstream Author : Red Hat and others
* URL : https://sourceware.org/newlib/
* License : various
* Vcs
On Fri, 19 Mar 2021 19:30:45 -0400 John Scott wrote:
> The package should be built against experimental.
I've come to realize that on the buildd's, packages from experimental
aren't pulled in unless required to satisfy the build dependencies.
Disregard this; it's not a bi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-electronics-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
Control: block 980889 by -1
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "binutils-sh-elf":
* Package name : binutils-sh-elf
Version : 1 (it's a native package)
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "open-ath9k-htc-firmware":
* Package name : open-ath9k-htc-firmware
Version : 1.4.0-106-gc583009+dfsg1-2
Upstream Author : Qualcomm Atheros and contributors
* URL
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-mozext-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "privacybadger":
* Package name: privacybadger
Version : 2021.2.2-1
Upstream Author : Electronic Frontier Foundat
Hello,
I'm working on packaging binutils-sh-elf, which is a native package which only
has a debian/ directory. At build time, it extracts the tarball from binutils-
source—whatever version it happens to be—and builds it into binary packages
with the appropriate options.
For informative purposes
On Friday, December 25, 2020 3:27:25 PM EST Tobias Winchen wrote:
> Did you try drag and drop the images e.g. to libreoffice impress? Via drag
> and
> drop I get the correct effects, but not via save. I reported this behavior
> upstream:
I had not tried that, but bizarrely it seems to not work
I can't sponsor KLatexFormula but use it and may have spotted issues.
I see this version introduces user scripts, but most of them start with
#!/usr/bin/env python
and the problem is that this doesn't explicitly refer to Python 2 or Python 3.
At this time, such a script is considered a release-cr
On Thursday, September 3, 2020 4:09:59 AM EDT Ansgar wrote:
> If it is a command-line utility the choice of language for its
> implementation doesn't matter to users and probably shouldn't be part
> of a package's name
It's both a command-line utility and a library, albeit a library applications
a
On Monday, July 20, 2020 11:07:05 AM EDT François Mazen wrote:
> Is there special syntax in debian/changelog file to reopen such bugs?
> I would expect something similar to the (Closes: #123456):
> (Reopens: #123456)?
No, you can't do it in the changelog. Instead, you can send an email to
cont...
, but not
any using 'dh'.
Thanks,
Scott
On Monday, July 13, 2020 10:50:00 AM EDT Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> Unfortunately licensecheck doesn't currently recognize
> SPDX-License-Identifier (I haven't check to see if there's a request
> filed for that).
Fortunately there are issues filed (#904518) and an author assures that support
will be ad
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 4:58:08 PM EDT Håvard Flaget Aasen wrote:
> The beginning of the error message is:
> CMake Error at
> /usr/share/cmake-3.16/Modules/CMakeCompilerIdDetection.cmake:26 (list):
> list sub-command REMOVE_ITEM requires two or more arguments.
That part of the module says
lis
Hi,
Unless I'm missing something, there's no way to patch a binary file (e.g.,
an image file) with quilt, correct? Any workarounds?
Thanks,
Scott
> > If there really is a problem with those files I would appreciate your
> > letting me know what I missed. Otherwise I hope you can avoid the
> > repacking trouble in the future.
> Probably not, but the repacking is not trouble.
Without a good reason, you really shouldn't repack [1]. I do not u
On January 5, 2020 12:34:53 PM EST, Wookey wrote:
>On 2020-01-05 10:01 -0500, Tong Sun wrote:
>> Now, before I redo the upload (and get it stuck again), let me try to
>> understand the situation --
>>
>> The reason it was stuck might be because my key was *considered*
>> expired. The problem is,
The package is in great shape. The only challenge to getting the package in
the archive seems to be the copyright file. Coreboot's README says
> Some files are licensed under the "GPL (version 2, or any later version)",
> and some files are licensed under the "GPL, version 2". For some parts,
> wh
I'm not a DD and can't sponsor packages, but I hope my feedback can be helpful
for you.
I see Lutris bundles python-distro. This is available in Debian, so the
package should use it rather than installing a bundled copy. Debian's
Winetricks should be used also.
Since Winetricks is in contrib, d
get my key refreshed, or would I be better off starting a
new application?
Thanks,
John Scott
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
wxMaxima FTBFS's for me with
$ pdf-engine /usr/bin/xelatex not known
I see that the 19.10.0 Debian package builds now by skipping the PDF manual
when it can't be built. I think I've found the root of the problem with
Pandoc.
It turns out this is a regression that's been there for ages and fixed
It doesn't build for me on Buster, it seems this version of Pandoc doesn't
understand giving the full path to the TeX engine.
make[4]: Entering directory
'/home/john/wxmaxima/wxmaxima-19.09.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
cd /home/john/wxmaxima/wxmaxima-19.09.1/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/info &&
/usr/bin/pan
I tried to fetch the source package with dget, but it doesn't seem to like the
new key it's signed with.
$ dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wxmaxima/wxmaxima_19.09.1-1.dsc
dscverify: wxmaxima_19.09.1-1.dsc failed signature check:
gpg: WARNING: no command supplied. Trying to
On 2018-12-27.23:06, Scott Leggett wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dhcpcd5"
>
> Package name: dhcpcd5
> Version : 7.0.8-1
> Upstream Author :
t over the package
* Add VCS fields to control file
* Add hooks for chrony, ntp, systemd-timesyncd, and openntpd (Closes:
#863462)
* Add autopkgtest-virt-ssh setup script
* Add autopkgtests for NTP hook scripts
* Disable built-in NTP hook script
* Update debian/copyright
Yes. You'll need to do that.
Scott K
On Friday, December 07, 2018 10:25:40 AM Brent Clark wrote:
> Good day Scott and Paul
>
> Thanks so much for looking at my RFS.
>
> Sorry for not communicating that in the changelog.
> Do you guys want that in the changelog?
>
This package currently has Paul Wise listed as a co-maintainer, but you've
removed him. Did you coordinate that with him? In any case, the change needs
to be documented in debian/changelog.
Scott K
On Thursday, December 06, 2018 08:01:39 AM Brent Clark wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-
On 2016-11-29.15:24, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> All good for me. It's uploaded!
Thanks again for your help!
--
Regards,
Scott.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2016-11-26.15:48, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 22 novembre 2016 23:55 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>
> > This is now ready, here are the changes since your last review:
> >
> > * Add automatic migration from -dbg to -dbgsym.
> > * Add users/groups unconditionally to
On 2016-11-21.13:56, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>
> >> > * Use systemd .service files rather than init.d scripts (Closes:
> >> > #678946,
> >> > #805840, #839819, #412483).
> >>
> >&
On 2016-11-21.08:11, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2016-11-21 at 07:56, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> > ❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett :
> >> I personally cannot test such init scripts since all my systems now
> >> use systemd, and I can't in good faith
- Forwarded message from Vincent Bernat -
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:56:00 +0100
> From: Vincent Bernat
> To: Scott Leggett
> Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13
Oops, forgot to CC the bug report..
- Forwarded message from Scott Leggett -
> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 23:39:31 +1100
> From: Scott Leggett
> To: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#845018: RFS: quagga/1.1.0-1 [ITA] -- network routing daemons
>
> Hi Vi
On 2016-11-21.13:56, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 21 novembre 2016 23:39 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>
> I'll review the changes for tomorrow.
Hi Vincent,
Sorry for this.. there are a couple more changes I'd like to make. If
you haven't begun review already, please w
Hi Vincent,
Thanks for taking the time to do another thorough review of another of
my packaging efforts! :)
On 2016-11-19.19:47, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 20 novembre 2016 01:43 +1100, Scott Leggett :
>
> > * Rely on automatic -dbgsym package rather than deprecated -dbg.
>
* Update README.Debian, README.Maintainer.
* Removed patch on vtysh.conf.
* Add NEWS.Debian about the major changes to the package.
--
Regards,
Scott Leggett.
On 2016-11-12.23:59, gustavo panizzo (gfa) wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 01:20:46AM +1100, Scott Leggett wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, I spoke too soon.. the .buildinfo upload failed with 403
> > Forbidden again :(
> Remove the .buildinfo line from the .changes file,
there is already a quagga in the archive)
Yes - I'm adopting it!
However I need to upload it somewhere first before I can file a RFS.
--
Regards,
Scott.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 2016-11-13.01:11, Scott Leggett wrote:
> On 2016-11-12.15:02, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> > * Scott Leggett [2016-11-13 00:06:39 +1100]:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I've run into a bug[0] with debexpo making it impossible to upload my
> &
On 2016-11-12.15:02, Nicolas Dandrimont wrote:
> * Scott Leggett [2016-11-13 00:06:39 +1100]:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've run into a bug[0] with debexpo making it impossible to upload my
> > package. I suspect there's a partially uploaded package sitting in t
lternative way to get the package reviewed?
The package is "quagga".
[0] https://alioth.debian.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=315172
--
Regards,
Scott.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ones seems to match the "unclutter" situation quite well.
Am I correct in understanding that using alternatives requires
co-operation between the two packages, "unclutter" and
"unclutter-fixes"? If that's the case, I'll approach the "unclutter"
thinking a) is the best option because it avoids stomping on the
existing unclutter namespace, but just wanted a second opinion.
[0] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825809
[1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-replaces
--
Regards,
Scott.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
code dumps from Jan Nekvasil
So, TODO on my (or Jan's) end:
Update wine wiki to point to github
Upload latest code to github
This shouldn't block you on making a first version of the package based off
mine, however -- we can update the metadata to point to the github repo
later.
Thanks,
S
he
> team works). I have added them to the CC.
...
If you'd like to continue to maintain it within the team, it is relatively
easy to get team sponsorship. If so, please update the package in the DPMT
svn and then you can ask for sponsorship via the team ML or on IRC.
Scott K
signature
On 10/11/13 20:10, Vincent Bernat wrote:
>
> Hi Scott!
Hi Vincent.
>
> Why do you explictely depends on libraries instead of relying on
> ${shlibs:Depends}? I suppose there is a good reason for that but I am
> lazy to test. I didn't catch any other issue.
>
No, t
e; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #729205)
-- Scott Leggett Sun, 10 Nov 2013 18:00:59 +1100
--
Regards,
Scott Leggett.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
1 - 100 of 305 matches
Mail list logo
