Peter B:
On 28/12/2024 12:03, Phil Wyett wrote:
???
Hi Phil,
just F.Y.I, I am seeing several emails from you each week,
including the one I'm replying to here, that have no body!
Maybe its my email reader (Thunderbird).
Is anyone else having this problem?
Cheers,
Peter
P.S. This mail h
Preuße, Hilmar:
Am 07.09.2024 um 23:49 schrieb Preuße, Hilmar:
Hi,
Can I tell mk-origtargz to use 7z instead of unzip to uncompress the
zip file?
The unzip binary is hard coded in MkOrigtargz.pm, I tried to replace, by
7z, but failed until now:
@cmd = ('7z','x');
Lajos Veres:
Hi,
I have got this email a few days ago:
<---
[...]
--->
If I understand well this package
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ksh93u+m
had an issue. ( https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1073656 )
Which causes the trouble.
(Misspell-fixer has a build dependency on shunit
Soren Stoutner:
Niels,
[...]
I do not consider this to be simply a “lintian” issue. Rather, I consider it
best practice as documented in the Debian Policy Manual.
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-controlfields.html#rules-requires-root
Policy is *also* out of date: https://bugs.d
Soren Stoutner:
Andrea,
On Tuesday, August 13, 2024 12:33:57 AM MST Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
[...]
That's a false positive. Rules-Requires-Root: no is already implied by the
build dependency on dpkg-build-api (= 1). Please see dpkg-build-api(7) and
bug #1057176. I also think that adding a linti
Hi
Sent to d-devel and d-mentors, since the members of both lists are the
target audience. If you reply, please consider whether both lists should
see the message (and prune the recipient list accordingly as necessary).
In response to a recent thread on debian-devel about editor support for
Elliana May:
Sorry, I have a few tabs open, this is the correct one:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/715071071/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-amd64.duckdb_0.10.0-10_BUILDING.txt.gz
I've tried now overriding the override_dh_auto_configure rule in the
debian/rules file, but even that seems to not be making
Preuße, Hilmar:
On 27.09.2023 19:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
Hi,
In your case, I would start with a give back and then if this attempt
fails, contact the buildd admins.
AFAICT that option is limited to Debian Developers. So if anybody would
be so kind
Hilmar
Turns out a give-back is
Preuße, Hilmar:
Hi all,
the package texinfo has been built successfully for architecture loong64
and is in status "Uploaded" for about a month now. I'm pretty sure there
are a lot of packages in status "BD-Uninstallable" b/c it does not get
installed.
What can be done here?
Hilmar
This u
Control: owner -1 !
Ileana Dumitrescu:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "debianutils":
[..]
Niels Thykier and I will be co-maintaining this package.
I got this. :)
Best regards,
Niels
Nilesh Patra:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 05:17:47PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
[...]
I had figured out this already, but conffile.lex.c does not exist in the
project, it is generated as a part of the lexer output. In particular:
Ok, apologies it was not clear to me from your opening email
Niels Thykier:
[...]
Hi,
[...]
I believe that this is stdio.h is generated by the embedded gnulib copy
and that is as far as I am willing to debug that rabbit hole. Based on
the error, I assume gnulib's generated stdio.h requires the project
specific "config.h" to
Nilesh Patra:
On 25 August 2023 1:47:26 pm IST, Nilesh Patra wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jul 2023 21:52:17 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: eegdev
Version: 0.2-6
Severity: serious
In file included from conffile.lex.c:242:
../../lib/stdio.h:64:3: error: #error "Please include config.h first."
Ole Streicher:
Hi again,
I think youe way could be to put the file list into a variable in
d/rules, and expand the list the .install, like:
-- debian/iraf.install -
etc/iraf/
usr/lib/iraf/bin/ecl.e
[... other fixed content]
${env:IRAF_FILES}
---
Andrius Merkys:
Hello,
[...]
My question: Is it OK to extract AmberTools from Amber tarball and
package for Debian main?
[1] https://ambermd.org/AmberTools.php
[2] https://ambermd.org/GetAmber.php#ambertools
Best,
Andrius
From the description you have provided, I would assume yes with the
Niels Thykier:
> Mathieu Malaterre:
>> [cc me please]
>>
>> Symptoms:
>>
>> I've recently discovered the following change in behavior for
>> dh_missing + cmake + -indep. Basically using compat 13 it is now an
>> error when build-indep rule in
Mathieu Malaterre:
> [cc me please]
>
> Symptoms:
>
> I've recently discovered the following change in behavior for
> dh_missing + cmake + -indep. Basically using compat 13 it is now an
> error when build-indep rule install stuff other than just the -indep
> files (1).
>
The error is not specif
Kip Warner:
> Hey list,
>
> [...]
> The problem here is this re-running of the myfoo-server.config happens
> before the myfoo-server.postinst. This is bad because the latter is
> supposed to update the values in /etc/myfoo/server.conf to whatever the
> user just entered via debconf prompts.
>
> B
Bastian Germann:
> Hi Lance,
>
> [...]
>
> You should not need to build depend on dh-exec with debhelper 13.
>
> Cheers,
> Bastian
>
Drive by remark/clarification:
* If you use dh-exec then you need to Build-Depend on it regardless of
debhelper compat level.
* With compat 13, debhelper
BenTheTechGuy:
>> [...]
>> debian/rules is missing a lot of functionality: mandatory targets like
>> {build,binary}-arch; passing build flags, handling cross builds, etc.
>> All of this would be much better done with dh (like the vast majority
>> of packages in Debian do) -- it does know ho
Hilmar Preuße:
> Hi,
>
> we got https://bugs.debian.org/978431 telling that the upgrade from
> buster to sid fails. This is also visible in piuparts [1].
>
> Unpacking texlive-base (2020.20201203-2) over (2018.20190227-2) ...
> dpkg: error processing archive
> /tmp/apt-dpkg-install-K7a7FC/07-
Marc Ferland:
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2020 at 6:24 AM Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> Niels Thykier:
>>> [...]
>>>
>>> Thanks, I have uploaded it to unstable.
>>>
>>> ~Niels
>>>
>>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> Because this libzc
Niels Thykier:
> [...]
>
> Thanks, I have uploaded it to unstable.
>
> ~Niels
>
Hi Marc,
Because this libzc renamed a binary, the upload had to go through NEW.
This in turn implied that I had to do a binary upload and the upload
will not migrate to testing without a new sour
Andreas Tille:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> Hi,
>
> upstream of fis-gtm package[1] confirmed that the build needs some root
> permissions. Thus I've set
>
>Rules-Requires-Root: yes
>
> When trying to build with pbuilder I get:
>
>dh_testroot
> dh_testroot: error: Package needs targe
Niels Thykier:
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Marc Ferland:
>> Package: sponsorship-requests
>> Severity: normal
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> Changes since the last upload:
>>
>> libzc (0.4.3-1) unstable; urge
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Marc Ferland:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> [...]
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> libzc (0.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* New upstream release.
>* New Dockerfile to simplify debian releases.
>* Remov
Christoph Biedl:
> Hello,
>
> while packaging something that makes sense on Linux only, but one of the
> built packages is architecture-*in*dependent while depending on some
> of the linux-any ones - in other words, that arch-indep package makes
> no sense on non-linux ...
>
> The obivous way to
Hilmar Preuße:
> Am 15.04.2020 um 02:45 teilte Wookey mit:
>> On 2020-04-15 00:02 +0200, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the answer Wookey!
>
> [...]
> Anyway: we have build failures of texlive-bin on sparch64/powerpc very
> likely b/c there are too many build threads called in paral
PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel:
> Hello, I am woriking on a new package called bornagain.
>
> I switched to compat level 12 and now I have this error message.
> I do not know how to fix this ?
>
> thanks for your help.
>
> Frederic
>
>dh_dwz
> install -d debian/bornagain/usr/lib/debug/.dwz/x
Andreas Tille:
> Hi,
>
> I intend to upgrade elastix[1] but I'm running into:
>
>
> ...
> [100%] Built target itkMevisDicomTiffImageIOTest
> make[2]: Leaving directory '/build/elastix-4.9.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu'
> /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_start
> /build/elastix-4.9.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gn
Nicholas D Steeves:
> Hi Ben and readers of debian-mentors,
>
> Solution at bottom.
>
> [...]
>
> "export DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=nodoc ; gbp buildpackage" does not work,
> although I expect "DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=nodoc ; export
> DEB_BUILD_PROFILES ; gbp buildpackage" should.
>
Rather, I think there
itd:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for the review!
>
> Niels Thykier:
>> # The remark:
> Oops! Fixed, thanks. (Updated Build-Dependency on debhelper.)
>
Ack. :)
>> * Relicense the patches to the same as upstream (requires approval from
>>the previous maintaine
Control: tags -1 moreinfo -pending
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 15:09:00 + itd wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> @Nico: I added myself to Uploaders. Please shout, if that is not what
> you meant in #890995 [1].
>
> [...]
>
> Changes since the last uplo
Antonio Russo:
> On 6/22/18 4:17 AM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>>
>> as promised, and unfortunately delayed a bit longer than I wanted.
>> thanks for the initial push - some of the points are more for a
>> discussion with upstream regarding their inclusion of some variant of
>> this, some are for d
Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:25:44AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> since yesterday packages using cmake are failing.
>> Nothing inside libbpp-seq was changed that should affect the build
>> process. I have the same problem with other cmake based packages.
>>
>> Any clue what might
George Shuklin:
> On 05/03/18 14:35, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 7:08 PM, George Shuklin wrote:
>>
>>> There is a big question with torture me for awhile. Why some purely
>>> declarative operations are performed by non-standard postinst scripts?
>> Probably dpkg doesn't support decla
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> [...]
Hi,
I have done an initial review of the changes and I have a few remarks.
Please CC me directly on any follow ups to this bug.
>
> Changes since the last upload:
Control: owner -1
On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 18:45:58 -0200 Paulo Ricardo Paz Vital
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "keychain"
>
> * Package name: keychain
>Version : 2.8.4+dfsg-1
>Upstream
أحمد المحمودي:
> Hello
>
> The package pcb builds 2 arch. dependent packages (pcb-gtk & pcb-lesstif) and
> an arch independent package (pcb-common) which contains data and
> documentation. Hence the arch. dependent packages depend on this arch
> independent package.
>
> Previously I ran:
> dh
Ole Streicher:
> Hi Nils,
>
Hi,
> Niels Thykier writes:
>> Ole Streicher:
>>> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 08:42:37PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>> The package is affected by the same issue that chocolate-doom was in the
&
Ole Streicher:
> Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
>> On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 08:42:37PM +0200, Ole Streicher wrote:
>>> * Not touching package due to block request by adsb (check
>>> https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html if update is
>>> needed)
>> https://release.debian.org/britney
Hilmar Preuße:
> Hi,
>
> we got bug #820984 on debconf a while ago. I'm not very familiar w/
> debconf, hence I had a look into the templates/config delivered w/
> debconf itself.
> I'm my eyes the code in proftpd is about a 1:1 copy of the code in
> debconf, nevertheless it does not work as expec
Etienne Dysli-Metref:
> On 17/01/17 18:30, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>> E: libshibsp7: postinst-must-call-ldconfig
>>>> usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libshibsp.so.7.0.0
>>
>> This lintian error:
>>
>> * is aimed at stretch or later, and
>> * shou
Etienne Dysli-Metref:
> Hello mentors,
>
> Since shibboleth-sp2 2.6.0+dfsg1-4 migrated to testing during the
> holidays, I'm now backporting it to jessie. So far there is nothing to
> change, however piuparts gives me the following error (which does not
> appear on stretch):
>
>> [...]
>
> So I
Andreas Tille:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to fix the autopkgtest of njplot. The current code in Git[1] is
> executing:
>
> xvfb-run --auto-servernum --server-num=20 -s '-screen 0 1024x768x24 -ac
> +extension GLX +render' /usr/bin/njplot -psonly example.phb
> X server has no GLX extension - required to
J.T. Conklin:
> My question, in the case where the same organization/people are
> responsible for both the software and the debian packaging, is whether
> there is a preference of which method is used.
>
> --jtc
Hi,
If you are (working on/with) upstream and doing the packaging, I believe
ma
J.T. Conklin:
> [...]
>
> A complication is that each platform config package installs the same
> set of files, so the normal package build technique of having all files
> being installed to a common staging directory and each package's files
> being selected by the debian/.install doesn't work.
>
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:46:32 +0200 Alex Mestiashvili
wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: mailatgo...@gmail.com
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> [...]
>
> Best regards,
> Alex
Hi Alex,
Thanks for your contribution.
Have you informed up
Jerome BENOIT:
> Hello Forum, is there a list where we can deal on how correct spelling error
> as detected by lintian ?
>
> For the curious. In the source, there is the sentence:
>
> :param int max_no_dec: number of rounds we allow to be stuck
>
>
> and lintian complains as follows:
>
Gianfranco Costamagna:
> Hi,
>
>> I have uploaded a new package to mentors, with the two outstanding
>
>> issues fixed.
>
> not sure...
> I see you forgot to probably run dh_clean
> (I see debian/autoreconf.before and debian/autoreconf.after files)
>
> [...]
>
> G.
>
That needs a "dh_autor
Andrey Rahmatullin:
> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 10:57:07AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>>> * Set compatlevel at debian/compat to 10.
>>
>> Is using compat 10 already officially endorsed/allowed?
> The manpage says "This compatibility level is open for beta testing;
> changes may occur."
Ross Gammon:
> On 05/22/2016 10:03 AM, Ross Gammon wrote:
>> The package is still building here,
>
> [...]
> I: sayonara: hardening-no-pie usr/bin/sayonara
> I: sayonara: hardening-no-bindnow usr/bin/sayonara
> I: sayonara: hardening-no-bindnow usr/lib/sayonara/libsayonara_somafm.so
> I: sayonara:
Mattia Rizzolo:
> On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 11:11:54AM +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 05/16/2016 11:07 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>> When reading the code it seems to me that actually a test whether this
>>> code works or not is intended and thus fixing the format is not in the
>>> intentio
James Cowgill:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> On Sun, 2016-05-08 at 20:17 +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> gearmand package has stuck in unstable due to missing -dbg packages:
>>
>> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=gearmand
>>
>> The debug packages were removed after switc
Joseph Bell:
> Howdy,
>
> I'm looking to understand how one gets a given software package considered
> for inclusion in Debian. I have 3 software components, one of which is
> https://github.com/Zewo/libvenice , and I'm curious as to where do I even
> start for getting into the next release of De
Niels Thykier:
> [...]
>
Sorry, I somehow managed to confuse it with "--onlyscripts", which needs
that treatment. Please ignore my previous mail. :)
~Niels
Matt Zagrabelny:
> Hi Tino,
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Tino Mettler wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 16:36:42 -0500, Matt Zagrabelny wrote:
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> I'm packaging up a firewall script that ships with a systemd service
>>> unit file. lintian is complaining about an init sc
On 2015-09-22 08:41, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> [...]
>> As for the build-id and how it is computed. It is based on the
>> internals of the ELF binary including but not limited to:
>>
>> * The path where the binaries were compiled
>> * The options given to gcc when compiled
>> *
On 2015-09-22 07:30, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
>
>
>> And why does it still work when i install back 1.4.0-2 ?
>
>
>
>
> well, if -2 and -3 didn't change symbols (e.g. you didn't patch the source
> code),
> why shouldn't it work?
>
> (I'm not sure to know how exactly the
On 2015-09-21 12:45, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while preparing the correction for a buildd failure on Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD i got a lintian complaint from kfreebsd-i386 7.9
> (the current "stable"):
>
> E: libburn4: missing-pre-dependency-on-multiarch-support
>
> [...]
>
>
> Have a n
On 2015-09-16 06:47, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I work with a free/open source project. We have a failure report from
> a Debian package maintainer on an s390.
>
Hi Jeffrey,
Thanks for your interest. :)
I am directing you over to debian-mentors, since your enquiry is
probably be
On 2015-09-06 14:22, "J.S.Júnior" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m get error lintian hardening-no-fortify-functions.
>
> I change in Makefile to `dpkg-buildflags --get CFLAGS` `dpkg-buildflags --get
> LDFLAGS`
> but no resolve
>
> Anybody can help me?
>
> []`s
> JJ
>
Hi,
The "fortity-functions" is pro
On 2015-09-03 15:53, Patrick Schleizer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> are there legitimate cases, where it is okay to place code after the
> #DEBHELPER# token?
>
> Cheers,
> Patrick
>
Hi Patrick,
Yes. There are many cases where it in fact does not matter whether your
code is above or below that token. Tho
On 2015-08-23 12:48, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Thomas,
> i worked a bit more on my local libburn package.
>
> [...]
>
> The failure of debuild -b with compat 9 still riddles me.
>
> With 9 it finally complains
>
> dh_install: libburn4 missing files (debian/tmp/usr/lib/libburn.so.4*)
On 2015-08-21 17:21, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 4:37 PM, tfauck wrote:
>>
>> Dear mentors,
>>
>> I am looking for a sponsor for the package paflib I just uploaded
>> (ITP - #781117) http://bugs.debian.org/781117 paflib
>>
>> debuild passes ok, but lintian -EviIL +pedantic g
On 2015-08-12 09:48, Niels Thykier wrote:
> [...]
>>
>
> Hi Bertrand,
>
> Neither solution will work. This is an artefact of how the testing
> migration code handles arch:all packages.
>
> Please file a bug against release.debian.org requesting help wi
On 2015-08-12 09:26, Bertrand Marc wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am trying to fix Debian bug #783875 [1]: playonlinux (which is arch
> independant) should depend on the 32 bits version of wine. Therefore I
> added a dependency on wine32|wine32-development, but it seems the
> package will not migrat
On 2015-07-15 08:45, Ole Streicher wrote:
> Vincent Cheng writes:
>> There are tools available in the archive to make this entire process
>> relatively painless (dput-ng)
>
> But dcut-ng is not in Debian?
>
> $ apt-get install dcut-ng
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
On 2015-07-07 14:50, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello Niels and all:
>
> As the last package of ovito, which does not depends on tachyon any more,
> has reached testing, I think that the tachyon package can now migrate to
> testing:
> how can we unblock its migration ?
>
> Thanks,
> Jerome
>
> [..
On 2015-06-19 15:21, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hi Again:
>
> On 19/06/15 14:52, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> On 19/06/15 08:07, Niels Thykier wrote:
>>>[...]
>>>
>>> Yes, provided it depends on the correct -dev packages. Though it might
>
On 2015-06-19 02:48, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
> Hello,
>
> thanks for your prompt reply.
>
> On 18/06/15 14:55, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>>
>>> what am I supposed to do for unblocking ?
>>
>> You started a (minor) transition without involving the relea
On 2015-06-18 14:55, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 8:22 PM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>
>> what am I supposed to do for unblocking ?
>
> You started a (minor) transition without involving the release team,
> please read this:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions
>
>
On 2015-06-02 20:10, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> [...]
> If I were the maintainer, I believe that I would have closed a bug like this.
> The actual maintainer however (now emeritus) is smarter than me. He did not
> close it. This suggests that he knew something I do not understand about
> prop
On 2015-04-01 08:06, Werner Detter wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> just a short question - a bug which has already been taken care of for wheezy
> and jessie is
> still listed as RC bug at
> https://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/debian/all.html
>
> Package: policyd-weight (debian/main).
> Maintaine
On 2015-02-28 16:37, Daniel Stender wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I've got the official Python logo image [1] here in a package.
>
> 1) what would be the proper license for that file in deb/copyright?
>
> 2) what's the best place in Debian to ask copyright/licensing related
> questions like this in the
On 2014-10-25 13:00, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=beast-mcmc
>
> says:
>
> beast-mcmc/i386 unsatisfiable Depends: libnucleotidelikelihoodcore0 (>=
> 1.8.0-1)
>
> but I have asked ftpmaster for removal of beast-mcmc from arch i386 and
> packages.de
On 2014-07-12 09:36, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ❦ 12 juillet 2014 05:19 GMT, T o n g :
>
>> Do I need to care about the lintian problems from the binary package that
>> I maintain/build?
>
> Yes, you need to handle at least errors and warnings.
>
>> For the following problems, I have no idea whe
On 2014-06-25 07:40, Paul Elliott wrote:
> [...]
>
> Therefore, I would like to request additional delay to sometime
> after libwxsqlite3-3.0-dev reaches testing. As matters
> now stand there is no way I can reach the deadline of
> -- maitreya 7.0.5-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 201
On 2014-03-02 12:05, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after I moved one of my packages (iausofa-c) from main to non-free, I
> had for some time the problem that the source still appeared in
> main. This, however, was solved "somehow" without any notice.
>
> However, now I get the migration "excuse"
On 2014-02-09 17:29, Felix Natter wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> Niels Thykier writes:
>> There is no "short" version you can use in d/copyright - you have to
>> list the full license of CC-BY-SA-3.0 as it is not in common-licenses.
>> Though, if you have it in a s
On 2014-02-09 16:51, Felix Natter wrote:
> hi,
>
> I couldn't find a short version of the "CC-BY-SA-3.0" license.
> -> now I am using this:
>
> Files: ./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.svg
>./freeplane_framework/script/freeplane.png
> Copyright: 2013-2014 Robert Gibson
> License: CC-
On 2014-01-30 09:33, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
CC'ing the FTP masters.
> I was trying to move a package (iausofa-c) from main to non-free with a
> new version. In the developers reference [1], the according paragraph is
> 5.9.1:
>
>
>> If you need to change the section for one of your
On 2014-01-27 23:41, Etienne Millon wrote:
> * T o n g [140127 23:37]:
>> $ lintian -EviIL +pedantic --color auto --display-experimental
>> ../*.dsc
>> [...]
>> I.e., when I invoke lintian manually, I didn't see problems reported
>> by debuild.
>
> Hi Tong,
>
> Lintian can check both source p
On 2014-01-27 22:31, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> I guess you want to tell me that I want something like
>
>
> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/mscgen.git;a=blob;f=debian/patches/language.y-parse-param.patch;hb=HEAD
>
> applied to maude code. I need to admit that I'm
On 2014-01-27 20:30, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody have a clue how to fix this C++ issue?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
It is not a C++ issue, but a change in bison you are looking at. I had
a similar issue with mscgen not too long ago[1].
~Niels
[1] http://packages
On 2014-01-27 20:30, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody have a clue how to fix this C++ issue?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
It is not a C++ issue, but a change in bison you are looking at. I had
a similar issue with mscgen not too long ago[1].
~Niels
[1] http://packages
On 2014-01-22 00:43, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> On 21/01/14 18:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> However, it is kicked because of an "old libffi" dependency. I realised
>> that it had in fact
>>
>>libffi6 (>= 3.0.4)
>>
>> in its dependencies which was included via
>>
>>${shlibs:Depends} or
>>
On 2014-01-21 19:45, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi Andreas and d-mentors,
> I hope this is the correct list to ask this questions - if not please
> redirect me (and also please CC me in your reply). [debian-mentors in
> CC as well - may be some other people have a similar problem.]
>
Seems l
On 2014-01-05 10:06, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 01/05/2014 04:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> since some days I noticed that a `dch -i` creates an entry with
>> "urgency=medium" instead of "urgency=low". Anybody with the same
>> observation and what might be the reason for this?
>>
>> Kin
On 2014-01-03 21:28, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> What's the cause (and fix) of the following error?
>
>dpkg-source -b dbab-1.0.1
> dpkg-source: error: can't build with source format '3.0 (quilt)':
> version does not contain a revision
> dpkg-buildpackage: error: dpkg-source -b dbab-1.0.1 g
On 2013-12-28 16:20, Willi Mann wrote:
> Hello Sergey, Hello Niels,
>
> I'd be willing to look at awstats 7.2~dfsg-1 and upload it if it looks
> OK to me.
Hi Willi,
Thanks for considering.
> Is there a packaging-related reason why Niels did not upload
> it for you so far?
>
> Bye
> Willi
>
On 2013-12-22 03:45, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to adopt the par2cmdline package, but on its QA page,
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/p/par2cmdline.html
> it says,
>
> ,-
> | "This package is part of the ongoing testing transition known as
> | auto-libunwind. Please avoid uploads unre
On 2013-10-07 19:37, Wookey wrote:
> I just packaged caveconverter (a fairly small simple command-line java
> package), which uses ant as a build system.
> (currently in new:
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/new/caveconverter_0~20130921-2.html )
>
Hi,
> This all worked fine, except that using
> De
On 2013-09-24 16:42, Dominik George wrote:
>
>
> Andrew Shadura schrieb:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 24 September 2013 14:48, Dominik George wrote:
>>
lintian --color=always -I -E -i --pedantic
>>> lintian -vIiE --pedantic --color=auto
>>
>> Properly reads as -Evil :)
>
> Hi,
>
> please fix your
On 2013-09-24 14:48, Dominik George wrote:
>> If I can fix all lintian reported issues, it'll be safe to say that I've
>> > bring the package to the last version of Debian Policy, right?
> No. It is safe to say that if, and only if, you bump the
> Standards-Version field to 3.9.4 and *then* have
On 2013-09-24 14:38, T o n g wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> The package that I want to pick up has a status:
>
> "The package should be updated to follow the last version of Debian
> Policy (Standards-Version 3.9.4 instead of 3.8.3)".
>
> I never knew the details of Debian Policy before, but did try
On 2013-07-08 21:04, Tong Sun wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> I'm trying to fix the following issues:
>
> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: changelog-should-mention-nmu
> W: libpam-ssh-agent-auth source: source-nmu-has-incorrect-version-number
> 0.9.5-2
>
> I don't want to do a NMU because there hasn't
On 2013-06-30 18:21, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm having some problems using pdebuild recently. I'm pretty sure this
> command worked before, and I have updated my pbuilder chroot.
>
> I don't have a orig.tar.gz, so I ask it to build a binary package, but I
> get this:
>
> ***
On 2013-06-17 11:59, Thomas Moulard wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> So what you need to do is move the building of the documentation into
>> the build-indep debian/rules target (instead of the build target).
>> That way it will not be built and thrown away
On 2013-05-11 20:32, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2013-05-11 20:17 +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
>
>> On 11/05/13 20:10, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>> On 2013-05-11 19:50 +0200, Torquil Macdonald Sørensen wrote:
>>>
Does anyone know why lintian would think that libmpich-dev, which is a
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
