Paul Wise wrote:
> The OpenCPN code contains this template:
>
> * Copyright (C) $YEAR$ by $AUTHOR$ *
> * $EMAIL$ *
>
> Upstream really needs to replace these by real information. Some files
> have the right info but still have the template. BTW, the template is
> wrong since (C) is not
David D Lowe wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.2-3 of my package
> "ooo-thumbnailer".
>
> It builds these binary packages:
> ooo-thumbnailer - thumbnailer for OpenOffice.org documents
>
> I'm the upstream author. The work is licensed under the GPL v2 or
> higher. My motiva
Paul Wise wrote:
> That isn't the problem, the problem is that Matthew's document is GPL
> and he has designated the HTML document as the source code, which is
> obviously not being distributed on the wiki.
So if I download a GPL program written in Python and translate it to C, then
distribute bo
Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Leo "costela" Antunes
> wrote:
>
>> Putting my money where my mouth is: done.
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMentorsFaq
>
> I just realised that what you have just done violates the license of
> Matthew's document. Please read the copyright /
Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> libjpeg8-dev: Conflicts: libjpeg62-dev but 6b-16 is to be installed.
I get the same problem trying to build the latest version of Qt (4.6.1
upstream + packaging files from pkg-kde's git repository).
Qt build-deps include libgtk2.0-dev and libjpeg-dev.
According to "
Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 08:32:50PM -0300, Nicolas Alvarez a écrit :
>> Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>> > All of this is currently in the "math" section and has been there for
>> > about 10 years. I wonder whether all of this should move t
Thibaut Paumard wrote:
> All of this is currently in the "math" section and has been there for
> about 10 years. I wonder whether all of this should move to the
> "science" or "interpreters" section. It is better if all these
> packages stay together, whatever the section.
>
> I also wonder how to
Justin Azoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:40:56AM +1300, Paul Wise wrote:
>> Comments on the source package:
>>
>> I'd strongly suggest using a rules.tiny style rules file and the
>> override_dh_* rules instead if you are going to use dh.
>
> I had tried that, but it wasn't working. I rea
Russ Allbery wrote:
> (\[xx] is a groff extension to the language.)
Is \(lq portable? It does the same thing.
--
Nicolas
(I read mailing lists through Gmane. Please don't Cc me on replies; it makes
me get one message on my newsreader and another on email.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian
Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Regardless, I'm sure I have seen some manpages that do show Unicode quotes
> in the man reader. Of course, I can't find any example now :(
Got it; those manpages use \[lq] and \[rq]. They are correctly converted to
either “” or "" depending o
Russ Allbery wrote:
> Nicolas Alvarez writes:
>> What about double quotes?
>
>> quilt's manpage renders like this in the man viewer: ``pushed on the
>> stack''
>
>> I looked at the source and the .1 file has exactly those characters too.
>>
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Nicolas Alvarez , 2009-11-17, 13:45:
>>>>In the manpage I wrote, I wanted to use English guillemets (‘’). This
>>>>lead to errors and I gave up, replacing them by `'. Guess what? Groff
>>>>understood what I wanted and put nice Unic
Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> on my updated package backup2l comes a piuparts error. But I
> cannot understand the logging of this error!
>
> Please look here:
> http://piuparts.debian.org/sid/fail/backup2l_1.5-2.log
>
> Can anyone understand the problem with this package?
> Where is the file sid.tar.
Paul Wise wrote:
> The INCLUDES = -I/usr/include change shouldn't be nessecary because
> /usr/include is in the default search path unless your compiler is
> utterly broken.
Having that "-I" may even cause problems for cross-compilers.
--
Nicolas
(I read mailing lists through Gmane. Please don'
Joachim Wiedorn wrote:
> Charles Plessy wrote:
>> Here are a couple of minor comments on the package, that can be adressed
>> in a later upload.
>
>> - How about maintaining the source package in a VCS?
> I thought this is the work of upstream, isn't it?
No, Charles is suggesting putting your p
Matthias Klumpp wrote:
> It is not my project, but another one I'd like to package.
> GLScene is a collection of Pascal components to make OpenGL usable in
> those applications *very* easily.
> It contains a lot of classes and helper scripts the program needs to
> compile. Those scripts are integra
Please take it to the debian-user list, and don't post the question
repeatedly.
sathya sai wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Can someone please help me out on this.
>
> Thanks and regards,
> Sathya
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 8:09 PM, sathya sai
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> Thanks for your mail.
>>
>> I had a
David D Lowe wrote:
> The latest update fixes several bugs and supports .odp, .odg and .ods
> files as well as .odt documents. I've followed the advice given to me
> by Jakub Wilk (uba...@users.sf.net) and replaced python-central with
> python-support. The package appears to be lintian clean.
>
>
Ben Finney wrote:
> This is what I do. Rationale: The Debian changelog, unlike the upstream
> changelog, is available for all Debian packages using standard tools
> *before* installing the package, which as a user is the time I most want
> to see what has changed in a new release of a package.
>
>
Daniel Leidert wrote:
>> $ xdg-mime query filetype bla.mm
>> text/plain
>> $ xdg-mime query filetype New\ Mindmap.mm
>> text/html
>> (the 2nd file has some HTML embedded)
>
> Ok, that's the problem. If it was XML it must have had the XML
> declaration: . But freemind files do not start with
> it.
Eric Lavarde wrote:
> MimeType=application/x-freemind;
> Categories=Office;
Are those semicolons supposed to be there?
--
Nicolas
I read mailing lists through Gmane. Please don't Cc me on replies; it makes
me get one message on my newsreader and another on email.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
> On my machine, standard bunzip2 consumes about 3.6 MB compressed input per
> second. I subscribed to a mid-level residential internet package. I've
> just downloaded a kernel tarball from kernel.org (199.6.1.164, Redwood
> City, CA -> Budapest, Hungary), wget has been showi
ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
> A trivial reason to use bzip2 is to decompress a file downloaded from the
> internet. If you have a multi-core CPU and the file was compressed with
> standard bzip2, you might want to use lbzip2. Perhaps even automatically.
If you download and decompress with bzip2, it takes
ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
> I'd like to ask users for their opinions about lbzip2 as a bzip2
> alternative in Debian, by requesting them to choose exactly one of the
> following options, after reading my DebADay article [0]:
>
>
> 1. I'd like to use lbzip2 as a bzip2 alternative.
>
> 2. I'd like to us
Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote:
> TLDNR: RTFM N00B!
So much for "'softer, gentler' Debian development mailing list" huh? ;)
(I know you weren't seriously being rude, I'm joking along)
--
Nicolas
I read mailing lists through Gmane. Please don't Cc me on replies; it makes
me get one message on m
Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Charles Plessy , 2009-11-17, 22:53:
>>In the manpage I wrote, I wanted to use English guillemets (‘’). This
>>lead to errors and I gave up, replacing them by `'. Guess what? Groff
>>understood what I wanted and put nice Unicode guillemets in the ouptut!
>>I am quite amazed, ev
ERSEK Laszlo wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Nov 2009, Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
>> But where to put the password?
>>
>> Due to the protocol used during authentication, the daemon needs the
>> pass- word in plaintext form, it can't be a hash (remote client sends "I
>>
I'm an upstream working on changes to how configuration is handled in our
program.
There is a daemon that is run at startup* with an init.d script, on its own
user account*. It supports remote control over TCP (disabled by default),
with password authentication.
(* where I say "is", I mean "wi
28 matches
Mail list logo
