Bug#902225: RFS: ii/1.8-1

Hi itd, the license change for debian patches is fine! Cheers, Nico -- Nico Golde - XMPP: n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0xA0A0 signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: libxml2 (NMU)

Hi, * Jakub Wilk [2012-01-08 13:50]: > * Nico Golde , 2012-01-08, 13:40: > >>More information here: > >> > >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/libxml2 > >> > >> > >>http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libx/libxml2/libxml2_2.7.8.

Re: RFS: libxml2 (NMU)

r me. Please follow the normal NMU procedures http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines I don't see your intention to NMU this package in the BTS. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - n...@jabber.ccc.de - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, al

Re: RFS: xpdf (updated package)

hich I am getting sponsorship from the security team. > They can be ignored. > > Would anyone be willing to sponsor this upload? Please split the security patches into separated files for each CVE id. Otherwise it's impossible to check whether you fixed all of them or not. Ch

Re: RFS: mediawiki (was Re: [Secure-testing-team] mediawiki: NMU to fix CVE-2008-5249, CVE-2008-5250, CVE-2008-5252)

Hi, * Giuseppe Iuculano [2009-01-25 12:37]: > Nico Golde ha scritto: > > As far as I can judge that the patch looks fine to me. > > Please upload to testing-security as described on: > > http://testing-security.debian.net/uploading.html > > [...] > I need a sponso

Re: #506353 CVE-2008-5312/3: mailscanner might allow local users to overwrite arbitrary files via a symlink attack

> > lenny (testing) 4.68.8-1: all > > Is there a chance to get 4.74.8 unblocked? Is it very unwise to even > try so? Ask the release team ;) > Do I have to contact security team and work on a fix for > 4.68.8? Yes would be nice :) Mail secure-testing-t...@lists.aliot

Re: Upgrade build process to build multiple packages

s? Where are they documented? [...] Did you see http://wiki.debian.org/PkgSplit? If yes and you still have problems, could you provide the source package? Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is

Re: RFS: moc (updated package)

Hi Elimar, * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-10 20:44]: > On Sun, 10 Aug 2008 the mental interface of > Nico Golde told: > [...] > > Fix the above things and I'll upload it. > > Done. Uploaded. As I am a regular moc user myself don't hesita

Re: RFS: moc (updated package)

7;t help, please read http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/07/msg6.html and ask for an unblock later. Fix the above things and I'll upload it. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail

Re: RFS: wmnetselect (updated package, QA upload, RC bugfix)

ed and mozilla is managed via alternatives to be iceweasel: Not everyone uses iceweasel.. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgp4PL9bSxMUx.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: moc (updated package)

Hi Elimar, * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-01 23:55]: > On Tue, 01 Jul 2008 the mental interface of > Nico Golde told: > > Hi Elimar, > > * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-01 21:56]: > > > I am looking for a sponsor fo

Re: RFS: moc (updated package)

Hi Elimar, * Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-07-01 21:56]: > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2.5.0~alpha3+svn20080629-1 of > my package "moc". I'll happily sponsor this great player if you fix the copyright years in debian/copyright :)

Re: RFS: sniffit (updated package)

meters except if used with -i :/ ./sniffit -d -p 7 -t 192.168.0.4 zsh: segmentation fault ./sniffit -d -p 7 -t 192.168.0.4 I don't have time to debug that but I think the code needs some fixes before uploading this to Debian. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: RFS: fig2sxd

Hi Alexander, * Alexander Bürger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-17 21:34]: [...] > fig2sxd- convert XFig files to OpenOffice.org format What is OpenOffice.org format? Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all tex

Re: RFS: wordpress

4/25/wordpress-25-cookie-integrity-protection-vulnerability/ > ? Already fixed in unstable. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html

Re: BTS Command to get messages to a BUG#

Hi Michelle, * Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-17 17:40]: > Please can you tell me the BTS/PTS command (and the E-Mail) > which I must use to get all messages to a Bug#. http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#subscribe Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMA

Re: RFS: imsniff (updated package)

Hi Juan, * Juan Angulo Moreno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-13 04:34]: > I have already made changes in the respective copyright file and i upload > again > into debian-mentors repositories Uploaded. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647C

Re: RFS: imsniff (updated package)

announce/2006/03/msg00023.html. If you fix that I will sponsor the upload. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgptpc1cjzIeh.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Anonymous delayed queue?

r the Developpers Reference. > > Isn't that just basic UNIX knowledge? Yes :) Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.htm

Re: signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)

Hi David, * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-12 15:10]: > Il giorno Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:53:21 +0100 > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-12 14:50]: > > [...] > > > I usually sign all my

signed mails to control@ (was: How to set BTS tags nicely)

to the original question: is it > possible to send GPG-signed mails to [EMAIL PROTECTED] What problems did you experience? Cause I sign all my mails no matter if they go to the control address or not and never had any problem with that. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAI

Re: RFS: xpn

L PROTECTED]> > * URL : http://xpn.altervista.org/index_en.html [...] The upstream homepage results in a 404, please adjust that. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://peo

Re: RFS: rafb

simple stuff they could even paste into a file. The usual thing is to do some package gathering such script like devscripts does for example. But this job seems to be actually done by the ITP of David. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For

Re: RFS: rafb

Hi Moe, * Moe Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-20 17:40]: [...] > It builds these binary packages: > rafb - Reads text from stdin and posts it to the pastebin at rafb.net Why should someone want rafb.net if there is paste.debian.net? ;-P Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http

Re: RFS: vttest - test compatibility of terminals

Hi Wen, * Wen-Yen Chuang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-03 20:31]: > Nico Golde wrote: > >>It builds a binary package: > >>vttest - a program to test the compatibility of terminals > >Compatible with what? Please fix the description. > > ==

Re: RFS: vttest - test compatibility of terminals

ditions, the only documentation of this program is the source code itself. To understand it, you also need a copy of the original VT100 manual from DEC." I hope you documented this package well enough so people would not to get the source package + a VT100 manual?! :) Kind regards Nico

Re: RFS: dia2code

d the package fixing some bugs. > > The package appears to be lintian clean. Uploaded! Feel free to contact me off-list for further sponsorship. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-r

Re: RFS: yougrabber

th proxy > support, made from scratch in ANSI C. > > A screenshot is available at : > http://sourceforge.net/project/screenshots.php?group_id=178664 What are the advantages over youtube-dl or wget with some shell magic? Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTE

Re: RFS: dia2code

eeded as usr/bin gets created by the Makefile. Please fix the above things and I am happy to sponsor this package, contact my off-list then. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted

Re: RFS: dragbox

nu policy, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/07/msg0.html The changelog: * Added debian menu entry * Closes bug#452982 This is really no appropriate changelog entry, see http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-changelog-

Re: copyright question

ditional copyright holders, license terms, etc.), and usually a > quick note about the packaging itself. Also worth reading when writing copyright files is: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Changing section of the source package - anything to consider?

ged section you will get a mail back describing an override disparity from the installer on ftp-master. You can then reply why this is correct and they will change the section in their list then. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For securi

Re: RFS for twiki ? - Re: Giving away most of my packages

ebian users, as it is one of the most complete wikis around... maybe > not much interest to DDs ? [...] The current twiki package and also the new -2 revision not yet uploaded has a security problem, please do not sponsor until you carefully checked the debdiff. Kind regards Nico -- Nico

Re: how to patch a patch

ch to get into a dpatch environment, edit the files and dpatch will update the patch file for you. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sp

Re: Advocate needs

nt to become an official Debian developer. If you just want your package in Debian you need a sponsor who uploads your package for you. Have a look at: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/maintainer-intro Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For s

Re: RFS: logapp

pp.sourceforge.net/> > > > > Rationale? Sponsoring isn't really about making sure your > > preferences are honoured. > > My education was: Every difference from the dh_make templates are bad, > except if you have good reasons for it. But hmm, ok... Since you don&#x

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

Hi, * Adam Borowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-15 01:17]: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2007 at 09:53:12PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > * Deepak Tripathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-14 20:44]: > > > libterm-ansicolor-ruby - Ruby library that colors strings using

Re: RHS: libterm-ansicolor-ruby

apes in ruby? Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgp824eFMzlSJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: php-http-upload

Hi, * Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-06 13:31]: [...] > Thanks for having a look and if you can sponsor the upload. I am sorry but I won't sponsor any php package, but since the package is in a good shape I hope someone else will. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - ht

Re: RFS: php-http-upload

is that you write Copyright: and then follows copyright and license information, please divide this with Copyright: and License: Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. ht

Re: Sponsor Checklist

ebuilt, just to be sure that the packages are build on a clean, sid > chroot. That won't work because you can't ensure that the chroot or pbuilder of the maintainer is up2date :) Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security re

Re: RFS: wmmemload (updated package)

Hi, * Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 19:31]: > On 7/25/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >* Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 17:48]: > >> It's a recommendation. It's not wrong to don'

Re: RFS: wmmemload (updated package)

Hi, * Nelson A. de Oliveira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-25 17:48]: > On 7/25/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >"The upstream homepage can be found at http://www.markstaggs.net/."; > >Please use the Homepage tag like described in 6.3.4 dev-ref. >

Re: RFS: wmmemload (updated package)

ons dock app which should be dockapp. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgpotMKb6jlbh.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Sponsorship guidelines for codehelp - now online.

Hi Neil! * Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-24 17:12]: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:43:41 +0200 > Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor > > > > > > (If this could be added to mentors.debian.

Re: Sponsorship guidelines for codehelp - now online.

Hi, * Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-24 16:47]: > -=| Neil Williams, 24.07.2007 17:32 |=- > > http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor > > Content seems to be missing? ? I see alot of content. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Sponsorship guidelines for codehelp - now online.

et the time. > > Done. > > http://people.debian.org/~codehelp/#sponsor > > (If this could be added to mentors.debian.net in due course maybe? Ta.) Here's my rough checklist: http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PRO

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi, * Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 19:33]: > On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >Did you look at trickle? > >> > >> Hmm. Looks simple/good too. > >> > >> Should I withdraw ITP? > > > >Ye

Re: List of (un)sponsored packages on Mentors (approximate)

d. I also see a problem in missing descriptions for the RFS. Sure it would be not very efficient to download the message from the archive and parse them but browsing a huge list of non-descriptive names is somehow bad. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GP

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi, * Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 18:41]: > On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe > >[...] > >> As I said, throttle is too simple with 3 or 4 command line options &

Re: RFS: throttle

Hi, * Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-22 18:17]: > On 7/22/07, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> throttle - A bandwidth limiting pipe [...] > As I said, throttle is too simple with 3 or 4 command line options > written in mind with si

Re: RFS: throttle

from the look or command line parameters whatever? In functionality (of course look would be a criteria in kde and gnome but they have a strong focus on the look while bandwidht limitation tools should have a strong focus on bandwith limitation) for example? Thats what differs in kde and gno

Re: lintian clean? (was: ITS: warsow (corrected package))

Hi, * Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-16 21:28]: > [ dropping debian-devel-games; topic moved ] > * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070716 19:53]: > > > Thats why it was change from "is" to "appears to be" :) > > The host runnin

lintian clean? (was: ITS: warsow (corrected package))

be" :) The host running mentors.d.n is not an unstable box, I guess we have to wait for a new lintian backport or Chris maybe have time to try the unstable version. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all te

Re: dpkg-buildpackage and fakeroot

hould I use for building packages in Debian? I guess most of the people (and the available documentation for developers) ues -rfakeroot. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http:/

Re: RFS: ophcrack (updated package)

son to search for a new sponsor now? Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgpKhI62AShvO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: disksearch

: http://disksearch.sf.net > * License : GPL > Section : python [...] It would help people with some spare time if you would give a description of what this actually is. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security

Re: ITS: fortunes-ru -- Russian data files for fortune

Hi Denis, * DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-02 14:05]: > 2007/7/2, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > >What about this one? It still is not even if the warning is > >not that important it should be fixed: > >[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/fortunes-ru$ lintian -I *

Re: ITS: fortunes-ru -- Russian data files for fortune

Hi, * DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-02 09:42]: > 2007/7/1, Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] The fixes look good. > >> The package is lintian clean. > > > >It's not please check. What about this one? It still is not even if the warning is not

Re: A note on lintian clean packages and mentors.d.n

> The font shown above is considered to be a duplicate of a > commonly available font. > > even tough those files aren't included in the final .deb Linda has way too much false-positives (the above is just one example) which is really bad. bugs.debian.org/linda vs bugs.debi

Re: A note on lintian clean packages and mentors.d.n

Hi, * Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-01 21:41]: > On 01/07/07, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 07:21:51PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: [...] > >Lintian is now v1.23.31 instead of v1.23.28 (Etch). Hope that > >hel

Re: Request for additions to the mentors RFS template

information in the very first RFS email to this > list, you have a much higher chance of attracting my interest. In most > cases, a bare template RFS will simply be ignored, regardless of the > merits of that particular package. ACK. I want to come up with an additional wish. 5. If the R

Re: A note on lintian clean packages and mentors.d.n

Hi, * Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-07-01 19:13]: > On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 06:11:00PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > I saw many packages using the template from > > mentors.debian.net which then always says: > > "The package is lintian clean." >

A note on lintian clean packages and mentors.d.n

our package for the Debian policy using the lintian package. If it doesn't complain please state that the package is lintian clean. This is a must for most of the packages". Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all te

Re: ITS: fortunes-ru -- Russian data files for fortune

ssues and I will upload the package for you. Cheers Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgpbiReTCvo2R.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Fix a bug located in a dependency

libB and libB is missing the proper dependencies you could to this as a workaround, but I would not close the bug then with the new upload since the lib is still missing dependencies. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security rea

Re: Status of wired

his: should I first have the package accepted into > Ubuntu Gutsy before getting it to Debian, or should I do the reverse? I don't really understand this question, package it for the distribution you want to contribute too. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RFS: cdemu

Hi, * Evgeni Golov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-17 17:16]: > On Thu, 17 May 2007 16:53:52 +0200 Nico Golde wrote: > > > You can also run iso images in qemu. What is the difference > > here? > > As I understand the upstream website, cdemu is not for booting an i

Re: RFS: cdemu

rceforge.net/ > * License : GPL >Section : misc It builds these binary packages: cdemu > - simulate a CD drive from a CD image cdemu-source - source for the > cdemu kernel module The package is lintian clean. You can also run iso images in qemu. What is the difference

Re: Are (c)debootstrap broken ?

ar errors if I do not provide a mirror) What does --debug say? Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgpp20wTz7alU.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: mercurial (hg) equivalent of svn-buildpackage?

ildscript located in > the > grml-mercurial-utils package. > > http://deb.grml.org/pool/main/g/grml-mercurial-utils/ Nope, they include different tools. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all

Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?

Hi, * Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-06 12:51]: > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 12:20:10PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > > If not, could ITS = intent to sponsor work? > > Would a 'review without ITS' be done by a simple reply to the RFS > wi

Re: request for sponsoring = RFS, intent to sponsor = ITS ?

work? Sounds good! Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. http://people.debian.org/~nion/sponsoring-checklist.html pgpxuQniruOYk.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: replacement for getpass(3) in older program (1994)

does not mention any problems with the > > getpass function--so I don't see any particular reason to avoid it. > > > > [0] http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/getpass.html#index- > > getpass-3653 > > Should I submit a bugreport/patch againt "manp

Re: replacement for getpass(3) in older program (1994)

gt; Can anyone tell me with what I should replace this function? There is no portable workaround function provided by a standard library AFAIK. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.

Re: RFS: paco

es, paco wraps the > "make install" command (or whatever is needed to install > the files into the system), and generates a log containing > the list of all installed files. [...] Do we really need this since there is checkinstall? Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://n

Re: RFS template request

* Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-27 15:18]: > On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:56:23PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > Hallo Christoph, > > > > * Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-27 14:29]: > > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 10:45:15PM +0100, N

Re: RFS template request

ow to unpack gz files (import gzip) but don't have a proper > parser for diff files at hand (I don't suppose that the difflib does > that). What about parsing it from the ITP then? The overhead should be a bit smaller here. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL

Re: RFS: packeth

e to remember me to upload tomorrow? Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgp9VhmzbOp2j.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: proda

Hi, * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 22:23]: > Nico Golde ha scritto: > I've uploaded proda_1.0-2 to mentors. It's available in: > > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/proda > > Please update the version in Debian :-) Done, happy pac

Re: RFS: proda

Hi, * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 20:58]: > Nico Golde ha scritto: > >> I had lots of warnings, all of the same type: > >> > >> warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' > > > > From what I can see

Re: RFS: proda

> the problem for gcc. Should I upload it to mentors, and eventually have it in > Debian already fixed, or wait and release a 1.0-2 version? I think the first > solution is the preferable one. You need to provide a -2 since I uploaded -1 ;) But there is no real bug yet, the warning is no

Re: RFS: proda

Hi, * David Paleino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 19:36]: [...] > The package has been uploaded again to mentors. See previous mails for the > link. Uploaded. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text

Re: Hello, anyone can help me upload lunar-applet to debian?

Please send your info with an RFS template like the others do. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpnCelpY0iol.pgp Description: PGP signature

commend lines in rules (was: RFS: proda)

Hi, * Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-25 16:58]: > Le Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 06:46:37PM +0200, Nico Golde a écrit : [...] > - I would tend to remove the template's comments, but this is up to >your taste. > - Similarly, you can safely remove lines such

Re: RFS: proda

but you don't convert it while building? - you have Uploader in control it has to be Uploaders - you directly patched Makefile, why not using dpatch or quilt? (or just do the rm proda and instal from within rules, patching is not really needed here and you never call distclean) Kind reg

Re: .changes file over several package releases

ot; is used to create such package releases, so the .changes > file contains the entries for several releases? Is it really a trick? Looks like there were versions in a rcs which weren't packaged and uploaded. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647

Re: RFS: rootsh

Hi, * José Manuel Bustillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-20 00:47]: [...] > It builds these binary packages: > rootsh - A logging wrapper for shells [...] What is the difference to script(1)? Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x

Re: RFS: echroot

Hi, * José Manuel Bustillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-18 21:35]: > The diversity is one of the attractiveness of free software, I > see very interesting echroot I don't see diversity here apart from the name. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL

Re: Fwd: Packaging for Debian

re begining my job I would like to know your > opinion. Look at http://www.debian.org/doc/devel-manuals that should be enough for the beginning :) Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 e

Re: possible inactive adopter (Re: RFS: tilda)

Hi, * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 01:27]: > Nico Golde ha scritto: > > [...] > > > > Davide, I looked at your updated package, I am not yet > > gratified with the copyright document. Here my proposal for > > what it should look li

Re: RFS: wmweather+ (updated package)

Hi Martin, * Martin Stigge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 01:03]: > On Mon, 2007-04-16 at 23:11 +0200, Nico Golde wrote: > > [...] > > I will sponsor your upload. > > Just two little things that would be nice: > > - Use the Homepage tag in control l

Re: RFS: wmweather+ (updated package)

into the description. - You don't need usr/bin in dirs file since the Makefile will create it, if it does not exist. Fix this and I am happy sponsoring you. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in th

Re: possible inactive adopter (Re: RFS: tilda)

Mhm, ok bad, I also wrote him a mail if he is still interested in maintaining tilda but no answer yet. Regarding that you both didn't get an answer I think it is fair to let Davide proceed. > > Anyway I'm glad to tell Nico Golde to sponsoring him. > > Nico, did you get answ

Re: RFS: inferno

Hi, * Romain Beauxis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-16 13:26]: > Le lundi 16 avril 2007 12:54, Nico Golde a écrit : > > Really nothing against Inferno, Limbo is great and I love p9 > > but I think the user base is a bit too small to justify an > > upload here. I don

Re: RFS: tilda

ion should no longer be used (it does not make a difference here) Fix this and I'll sponsor you, please contact me off-list then. Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG: 0x73647CFF For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted. pgpbSwp36ZUAB.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: RFS: inferno

ne operating system." > > Why not? Really nothing against Inferno, Limbo is great and I love p9 but I think the user base is a bit too small to justify an upload here. I don't see a point in using archive space for operation systems if they can be used in qemu for example

Re: RFS: inferno

g system > inferno-dev - A distributed operating system (development files) [...] Without looking further into your package (which shouldn't be native btw). What is the purpose to package an operating system in debian? Kind regards Nico P.S. Oh and would be nice if you announce if you highj

Re: RFS: echroot

Hello José, * José Manuel Bustillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-15 02:57]: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "echroot". [...] The description says that this is an alternative to the well-known chroot. What makes it different? Kind regards Nico -- Nico Golde

Re: Adding quilt to the new maintainer guide.

ource > package must be rebuilt ? Or maybe I did not understand how it > works. Where is it described ? http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/06/msg00010.html Yes, from what I understand the patches are in a seperate tarball (debian) and will be applied after unpacking the so

  1   2   3   4   5   >