fonts for both purposes above go into the
xfonts-kapl package, or should the TTF fonts for the the aplus-fsf-doc package
go into the aplus-fsf-doc package, or should they go into a new, separate
package which is then named in the Recommends field of aplus-fsf-doc?
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Aug 11, Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:12:45AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > On Aug 6, Rene Engelhard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > > Kevin Coyner wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 06:2
into the small components. Has anybody
figured out how to use just libx11-dev and make these macros work?
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
quot;GNU Autoconf, Automake and Libtool" book is very useful.
> It's available online and in print:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/
>
> Steve
apt-get install autobook
:-)
--
Neil Roeth
quot;GNU Autoconf, Automake and Libtool" book is very useful.
> It's available online and in print:
>
> http://sources.redhat.com/autobook/
>
> Steve
apt-get install autobook
:-)
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e interactive dist-upgrade. This is especially useful on my laptop, which I
often dist-upgrade while disconnected from any network. I also have
apt-listchanges installed so that I see what changes are being applied during
the dist-upgrade.
--
Neil Roeth
e interactive dist-upgrade. This is especially useful on my laptop, which I
often dist-upgrade while disconnected from any network. I also have
apt-listchanges installed so that I see what changes are being applied during
the dist-upgrade.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
expect it to do.
You can also just look at what /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage does, it's just a
Perl script.
Make is so ubiquitous that I think you should step back and learn more about
how make works, since you seem to be unfamiliar with it. Here's your
opportunity :-)
--
Neil Roeth
what you
expect it to do.
You can also just look at what /usr/bin/dpkg-buildpackage does, it's just a
Perl script.
Make is so ubiquitous that I think you should step back and learn more about
how make works, since you seem to be unfamiliar with it. Here's your
opportunity :-)
--
Neil Roeth
On Sep 10, Terry Hancock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies, this one brings up some related questions...
>
> On Tuesday 09 September 2003 07:55 pm, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > The approach I took with a multi-binary package that I created from scratch
&g
On Sep 10, Goedson Teixeira Paixao ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Neil Roeth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The approach I took with a multi-binary package that I created from scratch
> > was to do the configure and make, then set DESTDIR to $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp,
> > expor
On Sep 10, Terry Hancock ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Thanks for all the replies, this one brings up some related questions...
>
> On Tuesday 09 September 2003 07:55 pm, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > The approach I took with a multi-binary package that I created from scratch
&g
On Sep 10, Goedson Teixeira Paixao ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> * Neil Roeth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > The approach I took with a multi-binary package that I created from scratch
> > was to do the configure and make, then set DESTDIR to $(CURDIR)/debian/tmp,
> > expor
le for the source package,
not one per binary package.
Disclaimer: IANAE, but I think I have a pretty clean build setup for a large
package. I'm hoping someone else will take that as a challenge and tell me
how to make it (aplus-fsf) even better :-)
--
Neil Roeth
le for the source package,
not one per binary package.
Disclaimer: IANAE, but I think I have a pretty clean build setup for a large
package. I'm hoping someone else will take that as a challenge and tell me
how to make it (aplus-fsf) even better :-)
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sep 9, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 07:22:02PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > I recently read about target-specific variables in make, so I thought I
> > could
> > do this:
> >
> > pkg1-stamp: pkg1
> > pkg2-stam
On Sep 9, Colin Watson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 07:22:02PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > I recently read about target-specific variables in make, so I thought I could
> > do this:
> >
> > pkg1-stamp: pkg1
> > pkg2-stamp: pkg
:
"*** commands commence before first target. Stop."
Can someone tell me how to use target-specific make variables?
Thanks.
--
Neil Roeth
:
"*** commands commence before first target. Stop."
Can someone tell me how to use target-specific make variables?
Thanks.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
about a
month ago) does this automatically. You'll need to rerun the maintainer
scripts (automake, libtoolize, etc.) to pick up the effects.
--
Neil Roeth
about a
month ago) does this automatically. You'll need to rerun the maintainer
scripts (automake, libtoolize, etc.) to pick up the effects.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 29, Joshua Kwan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:34:41PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > Where can I get versions of packages that are not in any distribution?
> > E.g., I want a copy of the package opensp-1.5release-0.1, which appeared
> > betwe
On Aug 30, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > On Aug 29, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I have a package that installs a xemacs specific .el file, which
> > > naturally don't
On Aug 29, Joshua Kwan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:34:41PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > Where can I get versions of packages that are not in any distribution?
> > E.g., I want a copy of the package opensp-1.5release-0.1, which appeared
> > betwe
On Aug 30, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2003 at 08:30:38PM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > On Aug 29, Sven Luther ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > I have a package that installs a xemacs specific .el file, which
> > > naturally don't
d
the binary.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
works with xemacs21, and I
have both xemacs21 and emacs21 installed on my machines, so I know it's
working properly :-)
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
works with xemacs21, and I
have both xemacs21 and emacs21 installed on my machines, so I know it's
working properly :-)
--
Neil Roeth
d
the binary.
--
Neil Roeth
is there a better way.
> * If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
> building/maintaining your own archive.
>
> btw - we're only talking about a few packages. < 10.
>
> thx much,
>
> Eric
Sounds reasonable. Did you read the APT HOWTO?
--
Neil Roeth
is there a better way.
> * If this is the most reasonable way, where is the information on
> building/maintaining your own archive.
>
> btw - we're only talking about a few packages. < 10.
>
> thx much,
>
> Eric
Sounds reasonable. Did you read the APT H
nts of debian/copyright.Debian
Correct?
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nts of debian/copyright.Debian
Correct?
--
Neil Roeth
t would be much easier to version the message package
rather than attempt to keep track of which strings were for the old library,
which for the new, etc.
--
Neil Roeth
t would be much easier to version the message package
rather than attempt to keep track of which strings were for the old library,
which for the new, etc.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e and version them. With a
separate messages package, you end up with the same issues as libraries, as
far as versioning, coexistence, etc.
Thanks.
--
Neil Roeth
e and version them. With a
separate messages package, you end up with the same issues as libraries, as
far as versioning, coexistence, etc.
Thanks.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
7;m not certain that it was
done to solve the same problem, but it looks like that would work in my case.
Is there any reason not to do that?
--
Neil Roeth
7;m not certain that it was
done to solve the same problem, but it looks like that would work in my case.
Is there any reason not to do that?
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
interested in
the case where foobar and libfoo1 are installed, and a new version of foobar
is released that depends upon libfoo2. Should upgrading foobar cause libfoo2
to be installed, but also leave libfoo1 installed, since some other package
might depend upon it?
--
Neil Roeth
interested in
the case where foobar and libfoo1 are installed, and a new version of foobar
is released that depends upon libfoo2. Should upgrading foobar cause libfoo2
to be installed, but also leave libfoo1 installed, since some other package
might depend upon it?
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
IRC, I initially set up pbuilder with woody, then upgraded it to sid.
--
Neil Roeth
ially set up pbuilder with woody, then upgraded it to sid.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uched very little.
> > Whether you love or hate libtool, this is not a libtool problem. Are
> > you using libtool 1.5 yet?
>
> It's *always* a libtool problem. That's why I hate libtool...
I haven't heard anything good about libtool in a while.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
nest auto* setup either, it appears to have been done years ago
and touched very little.
> > Whether you love or hate libtool, this is not a libtool problem. Are
> > you using libtool 1.5 yet?
>
> It's *always* a libtool problem. That's why I hate libtool...
I haven't heard anything good about libtool in a while.
--
Neil Roeth
On May 30, Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Neil Roeth wrote:
> > Thanks for the hints. I should have been more clear - I have no problem
> > getting the main page, i.e., [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are
> > links in that page to bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?b
ibstdc++ linked in to shared
libraries of C++ code? The package uses autoconf, automake, libtool, etc.
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 30, Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Neil Roeth wrote:
> > Thanks for the hints. I should have been more clear - I have no problem
> > getting the main page, i.e., [EMAIL PROTECTED] There are
> > links in that page to bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cg
ibstdc++ linked in to shared
libraries of C++ code? The package uses autoconf, automake, libtool, etc.
--
Neil Roeth
n propagated to
the latest version, 1.2.1-32. So, as the new maintainer of the package, I am
closing the bug". Do I need to say any more?
(I probably wouldn't have asked if there hadn't been so much recent flamage on
-devel about closing bugs.)
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCR
ies preclude
automatically keeping my machine in sync with the build daemons. When will
the build daemons will be upgraded to 3.3? How will I know? I assume the
default compiler in sarge will be >=3.3, not 3.2, is that a correct
assumption? I don't recall seeing any discussion on -devel
n propagated to
the latest version, 1.2.1-32. So, as the new maintainer of the package, I am
closing the bug". Do I need to say any more?
(I probably wouldn't have asked if there hadn't been so much recent flamage on
-devel about closing bugs.)
--
Neil Roeth
8, 2003 at 06:49:50AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > I'd like to download the web page of bugs by maintainer,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED], and all
> > the bug reports linked to on that page, so that I can refer to them offline.
> > But, wget d
On May 28, Xavier Roche ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 06:49:50AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > I'd like to download the web page of bugs by maintainer,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED], and all
> > the bug re
ies preclude
automatically keeping my machine in sync with the build daemons. When will
the build daemons will be upgraded to 3.3? How will I know? I assume the
default compiler in sarge will be >=3.3, not 3.2, is that a correct
assumption? I don't recall seeing any discussion on -devel
by scripts. Before I spend time figuring this out, does
anyone know of an already existing means to do this?
--
Neil Roeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8, 2003 at 06:49:50AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > I'd like to download the web page of bugs by maintainer,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED], and all
> > the bug reports linked to on that page, so that I can refer to them
> > offline.
> >
On May 28, Xavier Roche ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 06:49:50AM -0400, Neil Roeth wrote:
> > I'd like to download the web page of bugs by maintainer,
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/[EMAIL PROTECTED], and all
> > the bug re
by scripts. Before I spend time figuring this out, does
anyone know of an already existing means to do this?
--
Neil Roeth
nd automake scripts, so I was
> wondering if there is a debhelper to move all the documentation into it's
> proper locations.
--
Neil Roeth
60 matches
Mail list logo
