Re: Procedural clarification

On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:28:50PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > New maintainer is more concerned with the fact that you actually have work > ready when you apply. So if you have a package ready for submission and peer > review, submit an application. Really? The entry form at the NM corner

Re: Procedural clarification

On Thu, Jul 05, 2001 at 11:28:50PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > New maintainer is more concerned with the fact that you actually have work > ready when you apply. So if you have a package ready for submission and peer > review, submit an application. Really? The entry form at the NM corne

ITP: libdbi-ruby, libnqxml-ruby (& sponsor/advocator?)

Hi everyone, I've created Debian packages for 2 Ruby libraries: DBI 0.0.5 and NQXML 0.6.3 (I plan to package a couple more over the weekend). The packages (plus source files etc) are available here: http://klamath.dyndns.org/debian/ They are lintian-clean and work properly AFAICT -- I'd appr

ITP: libdbi-ruby, libnqxml-ruby (& sponsor/advocator?)

Hi everyone, I've created Debian packages for 2 Ruby libraries: DBI 0.0.5 and NQXML 0.6.3 (I plan to package a couple more over the weekend). The packages (plus source files etc) are available here: http://klamath.dyndns.org/debian/ They are lintian-clean and work properly AFAICT -- I'd app