Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 03:21:27PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote:
>> > Hi, Justin,
>> >
>> > I tested with g++ 3.4 but I get error :(
>> >
>> > look.
>> >
>> >
Jose Carlos do Nascimento wrote:
> Hi, Justin,
>
> I tested with g++ 3.4 but I get error :(
>
> look.
>
> /usr/bin/g++-3.4 -fno-exceptions -I/usr/include/SDL -D_REENTRANT -g -O2
> -DPROFILING -DMMX -DDEV_VERSION -o VisualBoyAdvance SDL.o debugger.o
> 2xSaI.o Cheats.o EEprom.o Flash.o GBA.o
Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2005 at 11:21:41AM -0400, -.JavaManiac.- wrote:
>> I have the next linda-warning :
>>
>> W: libefltk2.0-dev; Shared object /usr/bin/ecalc is linked with
>> version 6 and 5of libstdc++.
> I can't tell of course if you're suffering from a similar problem
Adeodato Simó wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have some questions regarding FTBFS bugs. Sorry if they seem too
> naive but I'm always afraid of doing something wrong and I thought
> I'd better ask here then.
>
> 1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
>
Adeodato Simà wrote:
> hi,
>
> I have some questions regarding FTBFS bugs. Sorry if they seem too
> naive but I'm always afraid of doing something wrong and I thought
> I'd better ask here then.
>
> 1. if a package fails in any buildd machine, thats a FTBFS bug per
>
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:11:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> > would it be possible to upload the new package before the old one is
>> > removed?
>> Yes.
>
> BTW I've just discovered another problem in this renaming. Previous
> upstream author used timestamp base
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 03:11:41PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> > would it be possible to upload the new package before the old one is
>> > removed?
>> Yes.
>
> BTW I've just discovered another problem in this renaming. Previous
> upstream author used timestamp base
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>> Seems, that nobody knows exactly?
There's supposed to be a standard location for .desktop files once everyone
switches to the freedesktop.org standard. Unfortunately, I think neither
the GNOME nor the KDE in Debian actually has yet -- but they will in
future.
Th
Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
>> Seems, that nobody knows exactly?
There's supposed to be a standard location for .desktop files once everyone
switches to the freedesktop.org standard. Unfortunately, I think neither
the GNOME nor the KDE in Debian actually has yet -- but they will in
future.
Th
9 matches
Mail list logo
