Re: SONAME best practice

2012-05-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 08:16:08AM +, Andy Hawkins wrote: > Hi, > > In article <4fb20730.1090...@pocock.com.au>, >Daniel Pocock wrote: > > There has been some discussion on this list about flactag and libmusicbrainz > > > > libmusicbrainz SONAMEs have a colourful history and this i

Re: C++ help wanted: FTBFS mira

2011-12-08 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 09:39:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > I try to build a new upstream version of mira but failed and without > having realy checked it also the current version will fail with latest > gcc. > > The build log says: > > g++ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"mira\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=

Re: RFS: icecat

2011-08-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 08:54:29AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > On 2011-08-21 08:33 +0200, Javier Sancho wrote: > > > There is no limitation. Users can install non-free plugins if they > > want. They can go to Firefox website and download them. The only > > difference is that Gnu IceCat don't prov

Re: RFS: 0ad

2011-04-11 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 10:26:08AM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote: > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 06:04:43PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > from the replies I've seen so far, it seems that embedding Spidermonkey > > > code in 0 A.D.'s source is a no-no, or at least strongly discouraged. > > > > Maybe porting

Re: RFS: jsl - JavaScript program checker

2010-10-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 05:45:29PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 10/24/2010 03:22 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > > There is a big problem with jsl, though, in that like iirc jscoverage, > > it embeds its own copy of spidermonkey, and an old one at that... > > > > Mike &g

Re: RFS: jsl - JavaScript program checker

2010-10-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 23, 2010 at 05:08:46PM +0200, Laurent Arnoud wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "jsl". > > * Package name: jsl > Version : 0.3.0-1 > Upstream Author : Matthias Miller > * URL : http://www.javascriptlint.com/ > * License

Re: dh_makeshlibs exits with error on buildds and with success at home: is DPKG_GENSYMBOLS_CHECK_LEVEL set on buildds ?

2010-07-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:54:12AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 02:10:53AM +0200, Jakub Wilk a écrit : > > * Charles Plessy , 2010-07-22, 08:41: > >> I uploaded a package that built fine in a chroot made by the helper > >> tool ‘sbuild-createchroot’, but it failed on all

Re: will different compiler generate different symbols?

2010-07-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 11:32:36AM +0800, Liang Guo wrote: > Hi, ALL, > > My package(sunpinyin) is compiled with g++ 4.4, and it's symbols file > is generated by dpkg-gensymbols, when I switch g++ to 4.3, and compile > package, I get the following error: (snip) > > dh_makeshlibs: dpkg-gensymbols

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper

2010-04-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 12:57:17AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks. I am rethinking few things. > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 03:07:34PM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'll try to make myself clearer: > > > > the question is: why is e.g. debian/rules binary-indep never

Re: flow of things rules/debhelper

2010-04-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 09:48:13PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 02:37:41AM +0200, jmroth+...@iip.lu wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > today, I have a question regarding the maintainers guide, which says: > > You must be reading one from squeeze or subversion one which

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:21:29PM -0500, Peter Samuelson wrote: > > [Mike Hommey] > > There is a general problem with fuse, actually. fuse-utils is needed by > > any program using libfuse and allowing users (i.e not root) to mount a > > filesystem: In this case, libfuse

Re: migration to testing

2010-03-27 Thread Mike Hommey
Cc'ing to -devel, as it is a more general problem and I'd like to hear feedback from other fellow developers. On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:05:37PM +0100, Simon Paillard wrote: > On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 02:16:58PM +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote: > > One of my packages, fuse-convmvfs (uploaded by a

Re: what between ITP and RFS ?

2010-01-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 05:52:45PM +0100, Jérémy Lal wrote: > Imagine this common use case : > - create an ITP > - then make the package available for sponsors (say, on mentors), > - then send an RFS > - later (sometimes a lot later, or even never), the package is uploaded > > Is there already a s

Request for testing by someone in -mentors (Was: Re: RFS: instantbird)

2009-12-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 10:07:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:19:13AM +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > > Dear mentors, > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "instantbird". > > > > * Package name:

Re: RFS: instantbird

2009-12-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:19:13AM +0100, Gabriele Giacone wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "instantbird". > > * Package name: instantbird > Version : 0.2b1-1 > Upstream Author : Florian Quèze > * URL : http://www.instantbird.com/ >

Re: RFS: qemu-kvm (kvm)

2009-10-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:15:46PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Giuseppe Iuculano wrote: > >Michael Tokarev ha scritto: > >>I wrote to debian kvm package maintainer several times, I > >>submitted a bugreport against kvm long time ago, but never > >>heard back. > >> > >>So now I'm requesting a sp

Re: Realloc is blocking execution

2009-10-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:02:26PM +0200, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > * Mats Erik Andersson [091016 11:55]: > > 4. The main process WM receives SIGHUP, and enters a signal handler. > >The signal handler uses two calls: free_menuitems(), get_menuitems(). > > If those calls call malloc or free or

Re: Autotools (library + binary) to debian packages

2009-10-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 04:40:12AM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote: > On Mon, 2009-10-12 at 14:47 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > > Le Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 06:25:12PM -0500, Jonathan Nieder a écrit : > > > If the libfoo-dev is _very_ small and feels silly as a separate package, > > > you can include its

Re: Question about a library that is not creating its *.so* files

2009-10-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:42:23AM -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > Hi Mike and Samuel, > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:24 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:49:39PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:01:05AM -0430, Muammar El

Re: Question about a library that is not creating its *.so* files

2009-10-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 05:49:39PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:01:05AM -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I maintain a package which is called CEGUI. In current SID version > > (0.6.2), when you compile it, the next files un

Re: Question about a library that is not creating its *.so* files

2009-10-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 11:01:05AM -0430, Muammar El Khatib wrote: > Hi, > > I maintain a package which is called CEGUI. In current SID version > (0.6.2), when you compile it, the next files under usr/lib are > created: > > > As can be seen above, there is no usr/lib/libCEGUI*.so.* files.I have

Re: Canceled ITP for "lv2dynparam1_2-1_amd64.changes is NEW"

2009-09-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 09:47:22AM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > Hello mentors, > > my package was uploaded and waiting for acceptance. > http://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > Unfortunately ITP for this package was canceled by some other debian process > few weeks ago. > I've got email about it

Re: How to detect 32 or 64 bit at build time?

2009-09-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 12:05:55AM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote: > Sven Joachim wrote: > > > On 2009-09-07 12:54 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > >> How about DEB_HOST_ARCH_BITS? This needs dpkg 1.15.4, though. > > > > Sorry, that should have been DEB_BUILD_ARCH_BITS. > > As Neil would have poi

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-09-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 07:45:53AM -0500, Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: > In <20090901055635.gc6...@glandium.org>, Mike Hommey wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:03:06PM -0700, Joe Smith wrote: > >> Another issue sprung up, though. What I need to be able to do now is hav

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-08-31 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 04:03:06PM -0700, Joe Smith wrote: > Thanks Mike. Sorted that issue out. Didn't realize I'd commented out > dh_makeshlibs =) > > Another issue sprung up, though. What I need to be able to do now is have > libngi3 (0.8) and libngi3 (0.9) installed at the same time. They don'

Re: Issue with dpkg-shlibdepds

2009-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 04:09:21PM -0700, Joe Smith wrote: > Can you provide any insight on how I can get dpkg-shlibdeps to pick this up > automatically without having to hardcode the libmylib (= 0.8) dependency and > having to change that every time a new library is compiled against? Is the appli

Re: Multiple releases of a package on mentors.debian.net

2009-08-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 03:09:06PM +1000, Steffen Joeris wrote: > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:53:40 pm Ben Finney wrote: > > Steffen Joeris writes: > > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:19:28 pm Ben Finney wrote: > > > > How can I have two separate releases of my package, targeting > > > > separate archive suit

Re: Package uploaded with UNRELEASED distribution.

2009-08-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 02:42:17PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sun, Aug 23 2009, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > I had a package rejected out of NEW because of that (same case: > > UNRELEASED in changelog, Distribution: unstable in .changes). Being > > curious, I asked ftpmasters why it this w

Re: Package uploaded with UNRELEASED distribution.

2009-08-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 04:54:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Michal Čihař writes: > > Russ Allbery napsal(a): > > >> We had a specific request for Lintian to not warn about UNRELEASED as > >> the distribution so that people could run it on each build and know > >> that any output meant a prob

Re: different debian/symbols for 32 and 64 bit system?

2009-07-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 06:44:13PM +0200, Paul Wise wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote: > > > I am not sure if I understand well your question. > > I've change nothing consciously I create new symbols file ... there were no > > one before my upgrade. > > Maybe you can p

Re: how to fix "dpkg-gensymbols difference on (arch)"

2009-06-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 05:23:07PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:32:37PM +0900, Hideki Yamane > wrote: > > Hi mentors, > > > > I want to fix "FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols difference on alpha" > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin

Re: how to fix "dpkg-gensymbols difference on (arch)"

2009-06-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 11:32:37PM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi mentors, > > I want to fix "FTBFS: dpkg-gensymbols difference on alpha" > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=519819 > > The easiest way is remove debian/libchasen2.symbols but I think > there may be more bett

Re: multiple pbuilders (sid and hardy)

2009-04-30 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 11:14:59AM +0200, Michael Hanke wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:58:31AM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is it possible to have multiple pbuilders for Sid and Hardy (ubuntu) on > > Debian? > > Yes. An easy way is to install Ubuntu's 'debootstrap' pack

Re: debian/copyright verbosity

2009-04-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 05:25:04PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Mike Hommey writes: > > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:45:19AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > > > I don't think it's acceptable to make false copyright claims in the > > > ‘debian/copyright’ file.

Re: debian/copyright verbosity

2009-04-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 09:45:19AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Neither of these are true statements of the copyright; you have > *altered* the copyright claim so that it now makes a false claim (e.g., > you now state that ‘bar.c’ is “Copyright 2006 Mr. X”, which is > contrary to what the original so

Re: Getting -m64 at the right time and place.

2008-11-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 12:37:55PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > However, as I do not understand the purpose of -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, I am > worried it would be breaking maq on 32-bit arches to remove it. It will only break its ability to read large files (> 2GB). That is what _FILE_OFFSET_BITS

Re: RFS: flashblock -- mozilla extension that replaces flash

2008-09-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:54:03AM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Philippe Coval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "flashblock". > > Thanks for this ITP (bug#469906), I use the Flashblock plugin and find > it very neat and useful. > > > It builds these binar

Re: RFS: mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel and Icedove

2008-08-02 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 09:39:38AM +0300, Heikki Mäntysaari wrote: > 2008/7/28 Heikki Mäntysaari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > So it doesn't seem to be possible to install this extension to just > > one directory. Would it be a good solution if I install mozvoikko in > > /usr/share/mozilla/extensions/{i

Re: mentors.debian.net SSL certificate under Ubuntu?

2008-07-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 12:20:07AM +0200, Andreas Schildbach wrote: > Hi there, > > Surfing to on my Ubuntu Hardy machine > > https://mentors.debian.net/ > > gives me the error > > mentors.debian.net uses an invalid security certificate. > The certificate is not trusted because the issuer certi

Re: RFS: mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel and Icedove

2008-07-19 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 06:15:08PM +0300, Heikki Mäntysaari wrote: > 2008/7/6 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > - You really don't need to put a link in /usr/lib/iceweasel/extensions, > > since you are depending on iceweasel 3, and this version will look > > in

Re: Factorised code for adding a file in /etc/apache2/conf.d/ and restarting apache ?

2008-07-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 10:51:47PM +0900, Charles Plessy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Le Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 11:05:27AM -0700, Russ Allbery a écrit : > > Stefan Fritsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Saturday 05 July 2008, Charles Plessy wrote: > > > > >> - if yes add a link to a configur

Re: RFS: mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel and Icedove

2008-07-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:50:23PM +0300, Heikki Mäntysaari wrote: > Thanks for your help. > > I uploaded new version to mentors.debian.net: > http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=mozvoikko I only took a quick look but here is what I have to say: - Don't depend

Re: RFS: mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel and Icedove

2008-07-04 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 07:06:21PM +0300, Heikki Mäntysaari wrote: > 2008/7/1 Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Just generate one package, with symlinks in the proper directories. Take > > a look at packages such as livehttpheaders or venkman. > > > >

Re: RFS: mozvoikko - Finnish spell-checker extension for Iceweasel and Icedove

2008-07-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jul 01, 2008 at 08:46:49PM +0300, Heikki Mäntysaari wrote: > 2008/7/1 Rene Engelhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > Have you considered just putting the lib in the two packages and just > > don't build "mozvoikko"? (They have separate extension dirs anyway?) > > > > Thanks for your feedback!

Re: RFS: syx

2008-06-27 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 11:38:22AM -0500, Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:04:19 +0200 > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I bet this thing builds using lib

Re: RFS: syx

2008-06-26 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 11:57:03PM -0500, Luca Bruno wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 22:53:28 +0200 > "Jeffrey Ratcliffe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: > > >> debian/syx-gtk/usr/lib/syx/gtk/libsyx-gtk.so.0.0.0 shouldn

Re: Building a package for experimental

2008-05-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 06:02:19PM +0200, Tobias Toedter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm thinking about building one of my packages with a new feature enabled and > would therefore prefer to upload to experimental instead of unstable. > > However, although I looked into the Deve

Re: RFS: chmsee (updated package)

2008-05-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, May 17, 2008 at 07:33:28PM +0800, LI Daobing (李道兵) wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1.0.1-1 > of my package "chmsee". > > It builds these binary packages: > chmsee - A chm file viewer written in GTK+ > > this is a new upstream release, in this

Re: Check license and copyright of files in entire tree (was: Proposed new package, bugs-everywhere_0.0.193-1.1)

2008-04-21 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 11:27:18PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote: > Emilio, and everyone: a reminder to please continue following > http://www.debian.org/MailingLists#codeofconduct>. In particular, > please don't send individual copies of messages also sent to the list, > since I haven't asked for that.

Re: cowbuilder and --distribution experimental

2008-04-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 06:28:05PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > > Heh, I guess we have a different definition of 'properly'. > > > > > > pbuilder experimental usage assumes we can install everything from > > > experimental and get done with it, but I assume there are some > > >

Re: cowbuilder and --distribution experimental

2008-04-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 09:18:21AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > > > > experimental is not a complete distribution. You cannot just use > > > > --distribution experimental. I think that you should use an unstable > > > > chroot > > > > and add to apt experimental sources. You wi

Re: cowbuilder and --distribution experimental

2008-04-05 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 01:57:24PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > Hi, > > > > Hi again mentors !!! > > > I've now a strange problem creating an experimental COW image. > > > > > > I use "cowbuilder --create --distribution experimental" but I obtain an > > > unmet error with e2fsprogs (PreDepends:

Re: How to have automated versionning with the php5-cli (=XXX) | php5-cgi (=XXX) | libapache2-mod-php5 (=XXX)

2008-01-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:59:29PM +0800, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:14:07PM +0800, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm trying to build

Re: How to have automated versionning with the php5-cli (=XXX) | php5-cgi (=XXX) | libapache2-mod-php5 (=XXX)

2008-01-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 05:14:07PM +0800, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to build a package for eaccelerator. As most of the time, we > do put things in production on our servers BEFORE attempting to have > them sponsored into Debian, so there is less worries. > >

Re: *.commands file

2007-12-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 05:05:20PM +0100, Erik Schanze wrote: > BTW: I was not able to use dupload for uploading of *.commands file, > I used simple ftp client for it. Is there a more comfortable way? Try dcut. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubsc

Re: advice on maintainting packages on alioth ?

2007-08-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Aug 18, 2007 at 01:36:30PM -0400, Felipe Sateler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thomas Jollans wrote: > > > Hello mentors, > > > > In future, I would like to maintain my packages in Mercurial (or git) > > repositories. It seams the best place for these to be would be alioth, but > > I'm no

Re: RFS: gconf-cleaner - GConf database cleaner

2007-08-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 05:32:35PM +1000, Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/10/07, Julien Valroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > AUTHORS file doesn't need to be installed (debian/copyright covers it) > > > > Removed from the binary package. > > > > I must say I have hesitated as it w

Re: Creating /usr/bin/ entries to scripts the right way

2007-07-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:35AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 07:39:59AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > This is just the fine way. Or, for 2 lines, you can directly write them > > in debian/rules. BTW, I would recommend you to,

Re: Creating /usr/bin/ entries to scripts the right way

2007-07-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 10:48:21AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Debian Mentors, > > While working on a Python command-line application (harvestman, which > is already in Debian), I have the necessity to create a /usr/bin > entry. Now, creating a symbolic link to the actu

Re: [RFS] stunnel -- Universal SSL tunnel for network daemons

2007-07-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 09:51:29PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 08:55:01PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 05:51:18PM -0500, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2:4

Re: RFS: gnome-specimen

2007-07-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Jul 24, 2007 at 08:22:02AM +0530, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 7/24/07, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:35:17PM +0530, Kartik Mistry >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Dear mentors, >>

Re: RFS: gnome-specimen

2007-07-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 12:35:17PM +0530, Kartik Mistry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gnome-specimen". > > * Package name: gnome-specimen > Version : 0.3-1 > Upstream Author : Wouter Bolsterlee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * URL

Re: Change in my sponsorship requirements

2007-07-15 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 09:37:39PM +0200, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I outlined in the mentors.debian.net thread I'm a great fan of not > having different uploads with the same revision number. So I'd even like > to enforce that uploads to mentors.debian.net with the same revis

Re: Fix a bug located in a dependency

2007-05-25 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:04:16AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Doesn't that fuck up versioning tracking of the BTS ? > > No, because the bug should only be found in B, not A. So how would it help users with reportbug if the bug is now on B and not A, when they report on A ? Mike -- To UNS

Re: Fix a bug located in a dependency

2007-05-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:18:19AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -=| Mike Hommey, Fri, 25 May 2007 08:12:15 +0200 |=- > > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:41:49PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 M

Re: Fix a bug located in a dependency

2007-05-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:41:49PM +0300, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -=| Mike Hommey, Thu, 24 May 2007 19:39:20 +0200 |=- > > A standard example of this are bugs in applications that are due to > > bugs in libraries they depend on. Users would report bugs o

Re: Fix a bug located in a dependency

2007-05-24 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 10:56:08AM +, Jörg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I really would like to hear you oppinion about the following matter: > Package A depends on libB. There's a bug in libB. A bug report was files > to package A, because the submitter spotted the bug in packag

Re: Copyright issues GPL-PHP license

2007-05-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:29:37PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 6 May 2007 20:23, David Paleino wrote: > > Why? > > And a web server written in awk, then? Is that of any real-world use? > > I've seen implementations of that on the Internet. I admit that this > > is

Re: Copyright issues GPL-PHP license

2007-05-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 01:22:34PM -0300, Alex Queiroz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hallo, > > On 5/6/07, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >I also share Vorlon's opinion about the package as a whole: > > > >> In addition, the concept of a webserver written entirely in PHP is > >> ut

Re: RFS: truncate

2007-04-19 Thread Mike Hommey
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:34:24AM +0300, Damyan Ivanov wrote: > -=| Peter Pentchev, 19.04.2007 00:54 |=- > > > Or should I file a wishlist bug against bsdmainutils to get > > truncate(1) included there? > > I'd say bsdmainutils fits perfect. Its description says: > > lots of small programs ma

Re: RFS: truncate

2007-04-18 Thread Mike Hommey
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 04:53:38PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "truncate". > > * Package name: truncate > Version : 2007.03.13-1 > Upstream Author : Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (myself) > * URL : htt

Re: RFS: echroot

2007-04-17 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:24:42PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > > > >> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "echroot". > > > > > > echroot extends the basic options that we found in chroot, with > > > > echroot we > > > can control many more options than e

Re: ITA/RFS: libspf2 -- Sender Policy Framework library, written in C

2007-03-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 08:23:38PM +0100, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) Have not taken a look at the package, but does the short description > Description: Sender Policy Framework library, written in C really have to say "written in C" ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [

Re: Tone-of-voice used by sponsors

2007-01-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 03:11:54PM -0400, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/14/07, Thomas Goirand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Jens Peter Secher wrote: > >> Daniel Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > >>> if you insist on keeping the useless stuff, i consid

Re: reasons why downgrades are Not Supported

2007-01-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Jan 14, 2007 at 02:31:28PM +0200, Damyan Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > - -=| Tobias Richter, 14.01.2007 13:29 |=- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> (pre|post)rm of package version 1.5 must undo the actions. > >> However, what exact

Re: changelog entries - ubuntu?

2006-12-19 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 11:56:20AM +, Mark Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 02:31:32AM -0500, Joe Smith wrote: > > "Kevin Coyner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > > >f-spot (0.2.2-0ubuntu1) feisty; urgency=low > > > > > > * Update to 0.2.2 upstream > > > Tha

Re: Fwd: Re: RFS: renrot - a program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-11-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 06:31:05PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > >FWIW, jhead already does all that, except that it's not a perl script. > I know about jhead, but renrot has several differs such as: > - rotation of Orientation

Re: Fwd: Re: RFS: renrot - a program to rename and rotate files according to EXIF tags [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2006-11-06 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 03:48:54PM +, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sending reply to the list for others to view: > > > On 06/11/06 13:36:36, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > >>I am a whole newbie in the debian packaging. I've read the debian > >>new maintainer

Re: look for similar source package (kernel module)

2006-10-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 09:56:33PM +0100, Marco Amadori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alle 20:55, domenica 29 ottobre 2006, Daniel Baumann ha scritto: > > > Well, I just re-read the mail I got from him, where he wrote: > > > > "Provided the QEMU acceleration module is not sold (for example on a CD

Re: shlib-with-non-pic-code

2006-08-29 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:13:10PM +0200, Christian Aichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 08:59:19AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > Now, it seems the involved code doesn't set visibility. The best for > > Michael to do is to grep PLT in the ge

Re: shlib-with-non-pic-code

2006-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 09:39:03AM +1000, Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bugger. That's the only thing that I've ever had to check. Mike Hommey > appears to have deeper knowledge of why things can end up being > non-position-independent than me, so I'

Re: shlib-with-non-pic-code

2006-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 07:57:27PM +0200, Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > I got a strange problem with my kdesvn package and hope someone can help > me. Upstream switched the build system from autotools to CMake. > Now lintian complains about the files in /usr/lib/kde3

Re: how to compile source after I apt-get source it ?

2006-07-07 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:23:31PM +0300, Maxim Vexler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > a. How do I know what packages does tilda depends on to compile on my > system ? > b. Is there a debian utility that would go and get those packages for me ? apt-get build-dep tilda Note you may want to build th

Re: bug got stuck in "Fixed and Pending"? How comes?

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 03:31:44PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > >>> The upl

Re: bug got stuck in "Fixed and Pending"? How comes?

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 01:58:12PM +0200, Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Thijs, > > Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > Hello Harald, > > > >> http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/blockade.html shows that > >> bug #346938 is set to "Fixed and Pending" :-{. This > >> bug was fixed more that 6 mon

Re: bug got stuck in "Fixed and Pending"? How comes?

2006-07-01 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Jul 01, 2006 at 10:40:53AM +0200, Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks, > > http://packages.qa.debian.org/b/blockade.html shows that > bug #346938 is set to "Fixed and Pending" :-{. This > bug was fixed more that 6 months ago, so what is the > BTS waiting for? There's no m

Re: help with seamonkey

2006-05-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:54:25PM +0200, Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:46:06AM -0600, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I am trying to debianize seamonkey. I ITP'd it since I downloaded the > > source, did,

Re: help with seamonkey

2006-05-12 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 09:46:06AM -0600, Joseph Smidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to debianize seamonkey. I ITP'd it since I downloaded the > source, did, ./configure, make ,make install and evrything went fine > so I figured it may not be too bad. However I am having trouble > writ

Re: RFC: gnash (FSF Free Flash Player)

2006-04-20 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Apr 21, 2006 at 12:49:35AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * debian/control: about mozilla-dev, generally, xulrunner is being > > moved to these days, is that something that is possible for the > > plugin? I'd love to be able to try this in galeon/epi

Re: Regarding co-maintaining a package

2006-03-19 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 01:06:42PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! I wanted to know what the procedure to add someone as > co-maintainer is. I am the maintainer of a package, and would like to > add the name of another person (actually upstream author) as > co-maintainer.

Re: Proposal for collaborative maintenance of packages

2005-12-19 Thread Mike Hommey
> Am Sonntag, den 18.12.2005, 17:19 +0100 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > > This infrastructure is seriously needed in Debian because: > > - team maintenance with SVN is more and more popular, and a good web > > interface above a SVN repo of Debian packages would help all those > > teams > > I'd b

Re: pkg-config

2005-09-03 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 12:42:00PM +0100, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Saturday 03 September 2005 12:19 pm, Steve Langasek wrote: > > At the present time and given the current state of the software I > > believe it is not in Debian's best interest that you ship a .pc file *at > >

Re: webdeveloper for Seamonkey

2005-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 05:25:53PM -0400, Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You're right. With the jars unpacked, most of the data is the same; > whether or not some crazy [sym]linking would be required to accomodate > the files that do differ I have yet to find out. I'll prepare a pack

Re: webdeveloper for Seamonkey

2005-08-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Aug 28, 2005 at 03:25:54AM -0400, Michael Spang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: (...) > There are several possible courses of action: >* merge the Seamonkey version into mozilla-firefox-webdeveloper, > with a note in a description that Seamonkey support is now included >* package the d

Re: pdf files in upstream tarball and -doc package

2005-02-10 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 01:07:47AM +0100, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > also sprach Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005.02.11.0017 +0100]: > > sh > not on debian. :) > > shell tcp/udp disabled. :/ You mean it's not possible to run a postscript web server on debian ? How sad.

Re: -dev package dependency policy

2004-11-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:06:33AM +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 04:53:30PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:27:20AM +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >

Re: -dev package dependency policy

2004-11-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 09:06:33AM +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 04:53:30PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:27:20AM +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >

Re: -dev package dependency policy

2004-11-28 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:27:20AM +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > pkg-config --libs "uim >= 0.3.9" > > > > generates "-luim -lm17n" instead of only "-luim" as before. If the pkg-config file of uim gives a -lm17n, then, first of all, libuim-dev should depend on libm17n-dev

Re: -dev package dependency policy

2004-11-27 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 28, 2004 at 07:27:20AM +0100, Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > pkg-config --libs "uim >= 0.3.9" > > > > generates "-luim -lm17n" instead of only "-luim" as before. If the pkg-config file of uim gives a -lm17n, then, first of all, libuim-dev should depend on libm17n-dev

Re: RFS: mozilla-livehttpheaders-cvs

2004-11-22 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 10:35:53AM -0500, David Mandelberg wrote: > Mike Hommey wrote: > > What is the point of having a CVS snapshot for livehttpheaders ? > > I couldn't find any source code for the 0.9 or any of the official > releases, so I went with a cvs snapshot. Sh

  1   2   >