Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 13:47:04 +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote: > Hello! > > > On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic > > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is: > > replace them by the file to

Re: dpkg-source: unrepresentable changes to source

On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 13:47:04 +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote: > Hello! > > > On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote: > > > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic > > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is: > > replace them by the file to

Re: cannot build under m68k

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 15:12:28 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:23:53AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:15:27PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > I uploaded 'gpw' under unstable 20 days ago. > > > Currently status is for m68k as f

Re: cannot build under m68k

On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 15:12:28 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 09:23:53AM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:15:27PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > > > I uploaded 'gpw' under unstable 20 days ago. > > > Currently status is for m68k as

Re: uupdate and email problems

On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 18:03:32 +0100, Colin Fowler wrote: > a quickie question - I ran uupdate and It added the address > [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the changelog - not the address I want! uupdate uses debchange. You can use the DEBEMAIL environment variable (man debchange for more). Cheers,

Re: uupdate and email problems

On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 18:03:32 +0100, Colin Fowler wrote: > a quickie question - I ran uupdate and It added the address > fowler@eden to the changelog - not the address I want! uupdate uses debchange. You can use the DEBEMAIL environment variable (man debchange for more). Cheers, Micha

Re: Alpha machine

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 13:26:56 +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 13:03:44 +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > > > What is the name of the Alpha machine for Debian package development? > >

Re: Alpha machine

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 13:03:44 +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > What is the name of the Alpha machine for Debian package development? faure.d.o http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi Cheers, M/ -- /~\ ASCII ribbon | "i have decided to release the first 24GB of my genetic \ / campaign | code u

Re: Alpha machine

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 13:26:56 +0200, Davide Puricelli wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 01:09:14PM +0200, Michael Weber wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 13:03:44 +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > > > What is the name of the Alpha machine for Debian package development?

Re: Alpha machine

On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 13:03:44 +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > What is the name of the Alpha machine for Debian package development? faure.d.o http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi Cheers, M/ -- /~\ ASCII ribbon | "i have decided to release the first 24GB of my genetic \ / campaign | code

Re: how does autoconf find g++?

On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:19:28 +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote: > xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++ > (which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++. [...] > AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++) How about AC_PROG

Re: how does autoconf find g++?

On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 12:19:28 +0200, T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote: > xxdiff, uses autoconf, which is looking for the C++ compiler. It finds c++ > (which is a link into alternatives) and decides it's not g++. [...] > AM_CONDITIONAL(IS_COMPILER_GCC, test x$CXX = xg++) How about AC_PRO