/cxlflash/license, and are not
compressed now
Regards,
Mike Vageline
IBM POWER Software Development
-Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: -
To: Rodrigo
From: Andrey Rahmatullin
Date: 08/28/2017 08:46AM
Cc: 870...@bugs.debian.org, Michael P Vageline
Subject: Re: Bug#870909: RFS: cxlflash
hi,
Your build error is from missing this file:
> dpkg -S /usr/include/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
linux-libc-dev: /usr/include/scsi/cxlflash_ioctl.h
Are you building using a kernel that is shipped with 17.10?
> Why do both packages depend on some -dev packages?
> *fixed
Why does cxlflash depend on
hi,
These are all fixed in the latest... once you get the correct updates.
I: cxlflash: package-contains-empty-directory usr/share/man/man3/
*fixed
I: cxlflash: unused-override hardening-no-fortify-functions
*fixed
/usr/share/cxlflash/readme.txt and maybe some other files should be
shipped
hi,
>Do I understand correctly that postinst touches /opt? Including /opt/bin?
>I'm not sure that's a good idea even if that's only for migration (and
>it's definitely a bad idea if anything in /opt is created on a clean
>system).
>As the maintainer script logic is very complex
hi,
> *the software for the firmware images will not be included
Do you mean the images themselves won't be included?
*the binary images are in the cxlflashimage package,
but the source code won't be included.
Regards,
Mike Vageline
IBM POWER Software Development
hi,
> >What are the binaries in src/build/install/resources/ext.tgz? Do they
> > have
> >sources?
> > *they are some specially built utilities with no source.
> Non-free then.
> I also wonder how does that work with both ppc64 and ppc64el
> architectures.
>
> *this is a current e
6 matches
Mail list logo
