Sean Whitton wrote:
> After the release of stretch, I intend to work on removing xpdf from the
> archive for the reason that it is unmaintainable, not because it depends
> on poppler.
Orphaning does not mean that a package is unmaintainable. As I've
stated elsewhere I will continue to be willing
Svante Signell wrote:
> What else do you need? What are your problems with a _real_ upstream xpdf?
You don't seem to get what everyone is telling you. If you are not
capable of or willing to maintain xpdf with the poppler backend, then
you should not be its maintainer.
If a non-popplerized xpdf
I just want to let everyone know that I will be making myself
available to sponsor packages after the freeze again. My interest is
more toward keeping testing and testing security in good shape rather
than new and shiny stuff, although I will look at the occasional game.
With that said, here are
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Alfonso Sabato Sicilianowrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would make my first package so
> I would retitle this http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=652580
> from RFP to ITP. I am still not DM, can I do it? I need to have a
> sponsor ti retitle the WNPP bug?
Yes, of co
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:41 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Mike,
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 04:36:23PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> Yes. I don't have a link to the final decision, but you can easily
>> verify the veracity of that statement by looking at the versionin
On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2012 at 03:20:25PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> > Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option,
>> > because
>> > the version has to be smaller th
> Well, I thought this was only the case when there is no other option, because
> the version has to be smaller than the one in unstable (when testing has
> 4.3.6-1 and unstable has 4.3.6-2 with unacceptable changes). I did a t-p-u
> update like this (without the deb7u suffix) yesterday (for fossil
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 10:29 AM, roucaries bastien wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for the package "lcdf-typetools"
>
> I have found two license problem on this package:
> - #694352 lcdf-typetool include non free adobe d
Hi, I've taken a look at the bugs tagged patch, and the following 11
strike me as likely being rather easy to fix.
677861
681457
687396
687848
692129
693208 - seems to just need a tpu upload
693980
694015
694061
694340
694417
So, let's fix these easy 11 bugs!
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Sat, Nov 24, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Dominik George wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "redmine"
Hi, thanks for working on these issues. I'd like to see a few things
corrected in the changelog, but otherwise it looks good.
> * NMU to fix RC bugs.
There is specific language usuall
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
>> opportunity for mentees to build, test, and prepare a package to be
>> pote
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
> opportunity for mentees to build, test, and prepare a package to be
> potentially sponsored:
So, it's been almost a week, and I decided to tak
> Reviewed and uploaded. Thanks!
Make sure to send your debdiff to the bug report to stay in compliance
with nmu rules:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> thanks for taking the time to review the changes. Indeed the author of
> etw already checks for PATH_MAX in etw.c and stores the result in
> TEMP_DIR. On the other hand he uses 1024 bytes for the buffer at most
> and truncates the rest if it
Hi,
I had a quick look through the rc bugs that have a patch:
http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=wheezy_and_sid&patch=only&merged=ign&done=ign&fnewerval=7&rc=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&chints=1&ctags=1&cdeferred=1
The following look like they'll be pretty easy, so they're a prime
opportunity for m
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> * New Maintainer. (Closes: #544922)
> * Eat the Whistle will be maintained in a Git repository from now
> on. Change the Vcs-fields in debian/control accordingly.
> * debian/patches:
> Add 0005-Change
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 2:29 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As I wrote earlier on debian-devel [1] I have a few reports [2] about DM
> upload
> permissions. According to the announcement [3] the permissions "only via
> DMUA=yes" will be revoked on 24th of November 2012, and that date is com
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Lazarus Long wrote:
> Hi:
>
> The deferred NMU uploader has canceled it in behalf of mine.
>
> I'm not sure how to proceed now. Should I remove my version, or should
> it be re-evaluated as a RC bug fix?
Preferably the nmu will be re-uploaded since it's a targeted
control: severity -1 normal
control: retitle -1 RFS: sqldeveloper-package/0.3.0
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 9:40 PM, Lazarus Longwrote:
> - Download links updated (Closes: #618650)
> (Reported by Sergio Fernandez)
Since there is already a deferred nmu fixing the rc issue, I'm
downgrading the se
control: retitle -1 RFS: roundup/1.4.20-2
control: severity -1 normal
Downgrading the severity of this request since an nmu was uploaded to
fix the rc issue.
Before further review, the package will need to be updated to
incorporate the nmu, and at this point the upload should probably
target expe
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:11 AM, gustavo panizzo wrote:
> hello, i've prepared an updated version of slapd package which fix
> the bug #665199
Hi, I've just reviewed this, and it looks reasonable. However, the
changelog note is not really descriptive enough:
* Fix a bug while upgrading from
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 6:24 PM, Kai Storbeck wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for your prompt review.
>
> It seems I wasn't fully aware of the Freeze Policy. I was under a wrong
> assumtion that I could make the package's state better during the freeze.
>
> I've spoken with Salvatore who proposed an NM
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> I don't see the point to upload a version of just that to mentors.
> Just use:
> patch -p 1 < 80-width patch
> , update the changelog and you're done with the NMU.
It gives you a chance to be the one contributing to the release. I'm
lo
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
>> I'm removing the not-fit-for-wheezy tag since Thomas claims to have
>> improved on that matter.
>
>
> It still have the tag `not-fit-for-wheezy'.
This is more evidence that this tag doesn't actually provide anything useful.
This package was
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
>>>* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption
>>> of
>>> overly long file names (Closes: #690924)
>
>> I've reviewed this and it looks mostly good. However, can you explain
>> why you chose ERRWIDTH=
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> mcrypt (2.6.8-1.3) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
>* Non-maintainer upload.
>* CVE-2012-4527: stack-based buffer overflow by encryption / decryption of
> overly long file names (Closes: #690924)
I've reviewed this and it l
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Thibaut Paumard wrote:
>
> First of all, you are free to view the bug page with the ordering you
> prefer. Try using "ordering=standard":
>
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=sponsorship-requests;ordering=standard
Thanks for the hint. Reverting
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 6:18 PM, Kai Storbeck wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "roundup". I have a dedicated
> uploader (Toni Mueller), but another eye on my changes needn't hurt. It
> fixes 3 outstanding bugs, one of which is an RC bug.
Hi,
I've just reviewed this.
+ * patch
control: retitle -1 RFS: libpam-ssh/1.92-15 [ITP] [REINTRODUCTION]
Unfortunately this package was removed from unstable, so it won't be
considered for upload until after wheezy unfreezes. Removing RC since
as a NEW package the RC categorization does not apply.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCR
Hi,
I remember being rather frustrated during past freezes (before I was a
DD) at the lack of interesting things to do (since the fun stuff like
ITPs tend to go nowhere at these times). I assume there are a lot of
others in a similar situation now, so I just want to give a couple
suggestions.
Th
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> It is possible to target a package for testing during the freeze even
> though it does not fix any RC bugs, see everthing other than item one
> here:
>
> http://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html
I am certainly well aware of the freeze
Hi,
I feel like the current for-wheezy and fit-for-wheezy usertags
actually make the sponsorship-requests bug page harder to use than it
needs to be.
In actuality, any bug tagged ITP and QA should not have either of
those tags (since no itp or qa upload is going in until the freeze is
lifted unle
Just to let everyone know, I am making myself available to sponsor
uploads that fix RC bugs. Those uploads may be either NMUs or
maintainer uploads, just make sure to mark your sponsorship-request
with RC and I (and others) will notice it.
Best wishes,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-m
On Sat, Oct 20, 2012 at 3:14 AM, Christian Welzel wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: important
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "swftools"
>
> * Package name: swftools
>Version : 0.9.2+ds1-3
Hi,
I've just reviewed these changes.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> There is no reason shipping 4.0 beta3 rather than latest 4.20.
> If we check change Changelog, it is clear that the package get active
> uploads until 4.0 beta3 is uploaded.
> http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/non-free/r/rar/current/cha
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I maintain the wine-gecko package (wine-gecko-1.4), which is in an
> interesting situation because its build-dependencies can't be satisfied on all
> architectures, but it builds an "Architecture: all" package. Something
> sim
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Bart Martens wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I see that the package at mentors is no longer there. What happened ? Can the
> RFS be closed, or can you restore the package at mentors ?
>
> no package at mentors for RFS 664181 trustmanager 3.0.5-1
> no package at mentors for RFS
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 1:06 PM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
>> Dear mentors--
>>
>> I'm not sure if the etiquette for "nag requests" has been sorted out
>> given the move of RFS to the bug tracker, but
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 11.07.2012 13:34, Bart Martens wrote:
>>> Is it OK that a sponsor adds modifications to a sponsored package ?
>>
>> I see it regularly that sponsors do little modific
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Andreas Rütten wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> do you still have some time available for reviewing NMUs?
>
> If so I would like to point you attention to this one:
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=676927
Hi,
The bugs solved in your version are not relea
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Jonathan Niehof wrote:
> Dear mentors--
>
> I'm not sure if the etiquette for "nag requests" has been sorted out
> given the move of RFS to the bug tracker, but I submitted this RFS two
> weeks ago and have not received so much as a nibble. If anyone is able
> to de
> I'll just try this selectricity poll for now so we don't get billions
> of votes here:
>
> http://selectricity.org/quickvote/debianrfslist
So, I don't think those options accurately describe the choices. The
options really are:
1. Send useful bts discussion as well as verbose control messages
> I've read quite a bit on the kfreebsd-i386 problems with ELF, but I
> have encountered a different solution in every thread on the internet.
> Some said to patch libelf.h, which is sadly not shipped with prelink. We
> have libelf-0.7.0.patch, but that patchs a nonexistent file. We do have
> libel
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Daniel Martí wrote:
>> Would you mind incorporating the libtool fixes that I pushed in the -6
>> upload?
>
> Sure. But please, if you want to incorporate more changes, either do it
> all at once or email them to me so I can add them to the newer package.
> I'm sta
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Daniel Martí wrote:
> Dear Debian Mentors,
>
> A new package can be found up at mentors.debian.net:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/package/prelink
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/prelink/prelink_0.0.20111012-1.dsc
>
> Here is the full changelog:
>
> p
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Daniel Martí wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:11:30PM -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>> There were two patches applied in -2 that were cherry-picked from the
>> upstream version you're working on now. The patch systems will still
>>
> Since the last time I did the 20111012-1 package from 2090925-1 it
> worked flawlessly with the same dpatch -> quilt script, I'm assuming
> some change took effect between revisions 1 and 4 that broke this
> package for quilt, but apparently not for dpatch.
There were two patches applied in -2 t
Hi,
I just reviewed this package. It looks good except for a couple issues:
1. bin/credits.rpl seems to be a binary file in the repacked upstream
source (there may be others, but I stopped at that one)
2. I'm not sure that it's good practice to apply the patch directly
within the upstream orig
Hi,
I've reviewed this package, and it looks good. A couple other tasks
need to be done though:
1. Please send your nmu debdiff to #658830.
2. Since this is fixing a potential security issue, please send a
message (including patch and a good description of the problem) to
oss-sec [0] requesting
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Michael Gilbert
wrote:
>> Changes since the last upload are:
>>
>> * Fixed buffer overruns.
>> * Fixed FTBFS bug in debian/rules file. (Closes: Bug#666357)
>> Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum and Anibal Monsalve Salazar
>> for their he
> Changes since the last upload are:
>
> * Fixed buffer overruns.
> * Fixed FTBFS bug in debian/rules file. (Closes: Bug#666357)
> Thanks to Lucas Nussbaum and Anibal Monsalve Salazar
> for their help and for pointing this out.
Hi,
I've just reviewed this package. Since this apparently fixes s
Hi,
I'm going to be making some of my time available to review packages.
So, I'm primarily interested in looking at work that fixes
release-critical bugs, security issues, and just regular bugs as well
(i.e. non-maintainer uploads, NMUs). So, if you're the bug fixing
type, this is for you. I am
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:27 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
>> In terms of gpg public keys, the user could simply upload theirs to a
>> public_html alioth location, which would allow the mentors scraping
>> algorithms to pick that up. That process itself would be rather
>> simple, and could be documented
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Stephen Gran wrote:
> This one time, at band camp, Michael Gilbert said:
>> Based on discussion about making mentors official, one of the key
>> requirements is contributor DMUP agreement and upload authentication.
>>
>> One thought I h
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
> I don't think that will work, since you need to be in a project to get
> SSH access to alioth:
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/Alioth/SSH#I.27m_unable_to_Connect_via_SSH.2C_...
They could be made part of a "new contributors" project to start them
out
Based on discussion about making mentors official, one of the key
requirements is contributor DMUP agreement and upload authentication.
One thought I had recently was to move the file hosting functionality
over to alioth, which already has the necessary authentication
infrastructure. The process
> Nevertheless, when the involved package is orphaned,
> it would be a good idea to change its status to reflect the fact
> it is indeed orphaned, but also on the way to be adopted:
> a kind of limbo status.
Do you mean something like:
http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/orphaned_byage
Anyone can ad
As for the usertag names, I came up with the following when writing
support for this into reportbug:
'new': "a sponsorship request for a brand new package",
'update': "a sponsorship request for an update to a
package you've gotten sponsored and uploaded previ
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, Arno Töll wrote:
>> Hence, please add a "sponsorship-requests" pseudo-package with
>> debian-mentors@lists.debian.org as a package owner and we can get started.
This seems like a good name to me as well.
> I still need t
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:47 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
> DSA is the team which makes a DNS CNAME record, or provides a hosting
> facility. In my interpretation they are not making facts by that. Making
> mentors.debian.net a .org makes the project official part of Debian,
> just like any other core team
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Jakub Wilk writes:
>> * Gergely Nagy , 2012-01-19, 17:24:
>
>>> I might be mistaken, but the amount of NEW
>
>> Why only NEW? Checking only NEW packages doesn't buy us more than, say,
>> checking only package with with have "r" in their name.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm generally not a big fan to overuse the BTS for stuff it wasn't
> really designed for. This tends to result in complex processes that are
> difficult to follow for newcomers.
That statement actually describes the Debian project as
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:43 AM, Arno Töll wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> On 18.01.2012 08:40, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>> Dear DSA, do you think it's possible to have a CNAME mentors.debian.org
>> pointing to mentors.debian.net? It's currently not hosted on a .d
Hi,
I just wanted to join the growing chorus of supporter for this
proposal. I think its wonderful, and that's only partially because I
resurrected the discussion a few months ago.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed Jan 18, 2012 at 08:40:34 +0100, Raphael
Hi,
I'm trying to make use of the mentors soap interface, but it seems to
be broken. I've tried both python-soappy and python-suds and get
different errors for each. Here is the output of the attached scripts
that demonstrate the problems:
$ ./test-soappy
[...]
KeyError: u'xs'
$ ./
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 23:27:28 +0200 Arno Töll wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Michael,
>
> On 30.09.2011 21:57, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Then let's get mentors officialized to tear down this barrier!
>
> This is not some
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:23:35 +0200 Arno Töll wrote:
> I appreciate your efforts and I like the idea of reportbug integration.
> I won't comment about the patch itself, I am not maintaining the
> reportbug package, so I can't judge.
Thanks for your kind words.
> However please note, mentors.d
On Fri, 30 Sep 2011 17:30:49 +0200 Arno Töll wrote:
> Finally, a random poll: Are you bored from announcements like this, I
> make on this mailing list regarding Debexpo software updates and bugs
> since that's not /entirely/ on-topic here and you would hence prefer to
> use our own mailing list fo
ff -Nru reportbug-6.2.1/debian/changelog reportbug-6.2.1gilbert1/debian/changelog
--- reportbug-6.2.1/debian/changelog 2011-09-10 17:07:54.0 -0400
+++ reportbug-6.2.1gilbert1/debian/changelog 2011-09-29 00:16:40.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+reportbug (6.2.1gilbert1) unstable; urgency=low
Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> lintian -i -I is complaining about architecture-independent data:
> I: libswe-dev: arch-dep-package-has-big-usr-share 2121kB 78%
> N:
> N:The package has a significant amount of architecture-independent data
> N:(over 4MB, or over 2MB and more than 50% of the pack
Paul Elliott wrote:
>
> What version of debian must you have to develop debian packages?
>
> mentors.debian.net complains about my standards version:
> W: libswe source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.9.1 (current is 3.9.2)
>
> But if I set this version 3.9.2 on the control file
> Then l
be glad if someone uploaded
this package for me.
Best wishes,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110913222650.5d7b47eb846a5c0c3ec79...@gmail.com
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "minetest".
* Package name: minetest
Version : 0.2.20110731.3-1
Upstream Author : celero...@gmail.com
* URL : http://celeron.55.lt/minetest
* License : GPL-2+
Section : games
It builds tho
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 22:46:11 +0200 Jakub Wilk wrote:
> This is not a new idea:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2002/08/msg00262.html
After reading through that old discussion, I conclude that the highly
confrontational approach chosen by Raphael at that time lead to people
basically tunin
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:51:47 +0100 Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> I'm all for tracking RFS in some more formal way, it would quite a bit reduce
> the load on my inbox (which I'm currently using for tracking).
>
> There is one fundamental difference, however, to, e.g, the release team: there
> is no *t
Hi,
I've been thinking about how mentors works lately (after watching
Asheesh's debconf11 talk). It seems like the 4 day response effort
worked somewhat well for a while, but kind of tailed off, and I've been
pondering what could be done instead that would have some staying power.
I've noticed t
Vsevolod Velichko wrote:
> Dear Charles,
>
> this the very thing I want to do, but as far as I can understand, I
> should replace that variables myself, am I right? When I try to put
> the variables in debian/changelog, dpkg-buildpackage fails with error:
> dpkg-buildpackage: source version 1.1.0
On Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:06:29 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On top of that, there are a few spelling corrections, and a couple
>> cases of refactoring/improving the code in the standalone version.
>
> If this is really the case, I would propose to get these improvements
> into the libxpm package (a
On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 21:31:11 +0200 Paul Gevers wrote:
> Have you investigated the changes made by upstream lesstif in the
> embedded code and verified that they are not necessary?
Hi,
On the surface, the diff between the embeded library in lesstif and
the standalone libxpm seem rather large. Ho
me.
Kind regards,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/20110808003320.710df0f1058ebb2b99a73...@gmail.com
Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fuse.html reports 4 open security
> issues. I prepared an upload that fixes them, but how do I tell the
> package tracking system that they are fixed? There seem to be no
> associated debian BTS numbers.
I've added fixed version i
Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gordon".
> >
> > * Package name: gordon
> > Version : 0~git20101011-1
> > Section : utils
> >
> [...]
>
> I had previously reviewed that package; sorry for taking so long for yet
>
Hi,
I'm adopting amphetamine to close bug #544910, and I've brought the
packaging more up to date. I would greatly appreciate review/sponsorship
of the new packages:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amphetamine
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/amphetamine-data
Best wishes
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 11:52:08 +0100, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 08:03:41PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "enemy-territory".
> >
> > * Package name: enemy-territory
> >
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:56:29 -0500 Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "unix-privesc-check".
>
> * Package name: unix-privesc-check
> Version : 1.4-1
> * URL : http://pentestmonk
in
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/contrib/e/enemy-territory/enemy-territory_2.60-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
/pool/main/g/gordon/gordon_0~git20101011-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Best wishes,
Michael Gilbert
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "unix-privesc-check".
* Package name: unix-privesc-check
Version : 1.4-1
* URL : http://pentestmonkey.net/tools/unix-privesc-check
* License : GPL-2
Section : utils
It builds these binary packages
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "yui-builder".
* Package name: yui-builder
Version : 1.0.0b1-1
* URL : http://yuilibrary.com/projects/builder
* License : BSD
It builds these binary packages:
yui-builder - a build environment for YUI
The
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:31:52 + Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 07:21:46PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Would anyone be so kind as to sponsor an RC bug fix upload for xpdf?
> > A diff is attached. The package is available for review at:
> > http
Hi,
Would anyone be so kind as to sponsor an RC bug fix upload for xpdf?
A diff is attached. The package is available for review at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xpdf
Thanks,
Mike
xpdf.debdiff
Description: Binary data
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:58:23 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> [...]
>
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm sure you are aware of [1]. The second item of "Before doing an NMU"
> > > states:
> > > "Did you give enough time to the maintainer?" Unless I got something
> > > wrong,
> > > there w
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:54:53 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would anyone be willing to sponsor another RC-fix upload? This new
> libvdpau package fixes bug #603220:
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvdpau
Just FYI, I'm withdrawing this request since
On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:09:46 +0100, Michael Tautschnig wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:37:39 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > > Michael Gilbert writes:
> > >
> > > > Would anyone be willing to sponsor another RC-fix upload? This new
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 18:37:39 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Michael Gilbert writes:
>
> > Would anyone be willing to sponsor another RC-fix upload? This new
> > libvdpau package fixes bug #603220:
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvdpau
>
>
Hi,
Would anyone be willing to sponsor another RC-fix upload? This new
libvdpau package fixes bug #603220:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libvdpau
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 2:03 AM, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 23:08:50 -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Would anyone be willing to sponsor an RC-fix upload? This new wine
>> package fixes bug #602872:
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wine
&
Hi,
Would anyone be willing to sponsor an RC-fix upload? This new wine
package fixes bug #602872:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/w/wine
Thanks,
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:44:51 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> I just realised, the packages I'm complaining about are essentially
> squeeze backports. That is, they're packages that the packager wishes
> could have gone into squeeze but can't because of the freeze, so they
> go into experime
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 08:55:11 -0500, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
> On 11 October 2010 19:02, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso writes:
> >
>
> >> The *real* problem is that labelling Firefox 3.6 as "experimental" is
> >> downright silly.
> >
> > Hm, okay. I guess I'm not feeling
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
