On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
> someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
> maintained since 1.5 years...
>
> (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
>da/)
>
> I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to spo
On Friday 02 July 2004 09:20, Stan Pinte wrote:
> someone send me a mail, saying that these packages are already
> maintained since 1.5 years...
>
> (http://mentors.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/binary-i386/kno
>da/)
>
> I'll have a look, and contact their maintainer first.
I wanted to spo
On Monday 05 April 2004 20:57, Erik Bourget wrote:
> I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source
Any specific problems?
Create two trees from debian/rules
(man dpkg-deb ! and related (man deb) !!).
You may want to do this using debhelper scripts (man debhelper, watch
out fo
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:31, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, WHAT'SYOURNAME wrote:
> > I'm debianizing a package that I would like to split up, like:
> > package-backgrounds
> > package-icons
> > package-examples
>
> Why? How big are the components? Would somebd
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:40, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
> I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
>
> I tried to check some packages to find how do they solve this issue,
> but now I'm really confused.
>
On Monday 05 April 2004 20:57, Erik Bourget wrote:
> I'm wondering how to build multiple packages from a single source
Any specific problems?
Create two trees from debian/rules
(man dpkg-deb ! and related (man deb) !!).
You may want to do this using debhelper scripts (man debhelper, watch
out fo
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:31, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 09:24:10AM +, WHAT'SYOURNAME wrote:
> > I'm debianizing a package that I would like to split up, like:
> > package-backgrounds
> > package-icons
> > package-examples
>
> Why? How big are the components? Would somebd
On Monday 05 April 2004 14:40, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> Is there any policy describing location of .desktop files?
> I've just checked Debian Policy, FHS and Developer's Reference, but
>
> I tried to check some packages to find how do they solve this issue,
> but now I'm really confused.
>
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:08, Frank Küster wrote:
> In particular, I'm looking for something like
>
> "The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the
> downloaded archive, as specified in copyright, as closely as
> possible. If there are changes, they have to be documented in ...
On Wednesday 10 March 2004 17:08, Frank Küster wrote:
> In particular, I'm looking for something like
>
> "The contents of the orig.tar.gz should match contents of the
> downloaded archive, as specified in copyright, as closely as
> possible. If there are changes, they have to be documented in ...
> Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS game
> that was called the mother of all
..
> You've probably guessed that I'm looking for a sponser.
> I hope you'll at least play the game to see if you like it.
>> I'm sorry i couldn't, the orig.tar is missing?
>> No binaries
> Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS game
> that was called the mother of all
..
> You've probably guessed that I'm looking for a sponser.
> I hope you'll at least play the game to see if you like it.
>> I'm sorry i couldn't, the orig.tar is missing?
>> No binaries
On Saturday 21 February 2004 04:04, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-21 01:46]:
> Hello I search a sponsor for my packet binclock.
> I read more documentation and know the package is lintian bug free.
>
> > You can find the files it under:
> sorry, this is right:
> >
On Saturday 21 February 2004 16:06, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> I'm sorry to insist, but do you think that the workaround described
> below is acceptable regarding debian policy ? By workaround, I mean
> (shorrt version): as the libs needed by pgAdmin3 won't enter debian
> for the moment (and may be ne
On Saturday 21 February 2004 23:37, wrote:
> Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS
> game that was called the mother of all games. It is a multi-player,
> turn-based, artilary stratagy game with many large weapons to blow of
> your friends with. It's big fun. For more i
On Saturday 21 February 2004 04:04, Nico Golde wrote:
> * Nico Golde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-02-21 01:46]:
> Hello I search a sponsor for my packet binclock.
> I read more documentation and know the package is lintian bug free.
>
> > You can find the files it under:
> sorry, this is right:
> >
On Saturday 21 February 2004 16:06, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> I'm sorry to insist, but do you think that the workaround described
> below is acceptable regarding debian policy ? By workaround, I mean
> (shorrt version): as the libs needed by pgAdmin3 won't enter debian
> for the moment (and may be ne
On Saturday 21 February 2004 23:37, wrote:
> Atanks is a GPL'd game based on scorched earth which is a old DOS
> game that was called the mother of all games. It is a multi-player,
> turn-based, artilary stratagy game with many large weapons to blow of
> your friends with. It's big fun. For more i
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:21, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
> How can I install the missing dependecies? Or is there an other
Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin
On Wednesday 18 February 2004 09:21, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
> How can I install the missing dependecies? Or is there an other
Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 14:18, Berin Lautenbach wrote:
> So the question is, is it permissable to put such a basic test of a
> library into the rules file that gets executed as part of the build
> process? If so, are there any guidelines anywhere as to how one
>
> The test would involve compili
On Wednesday 30 April 2003 16:14, David Roundy wrote:
> > The usual way is using "pre1", "pre2", ..., "rc1", ..., "rel". As a
> > matter of fact, this sorts nicely.
>
> Doesn't this have the problem that debian considers 1.2pre1 to be a
> later version than 1.2?
As Andrew and others wrote: no if y
Say, i have a need of a certain pkg, depended on by others that i want
to be in the pool quickly, so that i can continue with those depending.
Is it a good idea in general to try to build and upload from debian
machines for some archs?
thank you for your reply, martin
Say, i have a need of a certain pkg, depended on by others that i want
to be in the pool quickly, so that i can continue with those depending.
Is it a good idea in general to try to build and upload from debian
machines for some archs?
thank you for your reply, martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 19:52, Mike Schacht wrote:
> Here we go again... Looking for a sponser for knoda.
I had a look on that package, but as i don't know about current kde3
practices, i'd rather not step forward to upload.
> knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on hk_classes
On Tuesday 10 December 2002 19:52, Mike Schacht wrote:
> Here we go again... Looking for a sponser for knoda.
I had a look on that package, but as i don't know about current kde3
practices, i'd rather not step forward to upload.
> knoda is a database frontend for KDE. It is based on hk_classes
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
> > fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
> >
> > If this abuse continues, I might j
On Friday 31 August 2001 13:18, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 09:09:03AM +0200, Josip Rodin wrote:
> > Using 'close' to close bugs, especially those which arn't really
> > fixed but just no longer useful, is WRONG. The submitter only gets
> >
> > If this abuse continues, I might
(Crossposted d-devel intentionally. Replies to d-mentors only, please).
GGI project released GGI 2.0. Debian is going woody. I would like to
have a clean GGI in woody, but trouble with bugs and policy.
Libgii and libggi, the DYNAMIC duo, lived, more or less happily, for a
long time without any
(Crossposted d-devel intentionally. Replies to d-mentors only, please).
GGI project released GGI 2.0. Debian is going woody. I would like to
have a clean GGI in woody, but trouble with bugs and policy.
Libgii and libggi, the DYNAMIC duo, lived, more or less happily, for a
long time without an
I've send to the wrong adress, here it is to the list again:
Thanks Matt Zimmermann for your kind and reassuring answers.
For a summary see his answers. I couldn't express better.
I'm planning to use debconf as soon as it has settled somewhat.
Open are the questions:
- How to find out that deb
I've send to the wrong adress, here it is to the list again:
Thanks Matt Zimmermann for your kind and reassuring answers.
For a summary see his answers. I couldn't express better.
I'm planning to use debconf as soon as it has settled somewhat.
Open are the questions:
- How to find out that de
Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
enough, it seems.
All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
sorry, thanks, greetings martin
Uhm, sorry - that question was silly. I haven't made up my mind wide
enough, it seems.
All that is left on this issue: Is it ok for postinst to output a
message of minor priority without pause/prompting for a key?
sorry, thanks, greetings martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, dear developers!
libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
following:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libggi-target-fbdev
Version: 1:1.99.2.0b3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
When I upgraded the g
Hello, dear developers!
libggi-target-fbdev.postinst checks /dev for framebuffer entries. If
none are found, it offers to create them. Now i've received the
following:
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: libggi-target-fbdev
Version: 1:1.99.2.0b3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
When I upgraded the
> > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Hmm, the configure file should also check for ghttp.h, it didnt
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:21:13PM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
> > This produces unnecessary hassles when, fo
On Saturday 24 February 2001 17:48, Eric VB wrote:
> Now if I add a line to debian/postrm.debhelper, everytime I re-build
> my package (dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot), this line is erased. Where
> do I have to declare my cutomized commands ?
>
> man dh_installdeb doesn't help and is a bit confused :
Hello, ya all!
I chose the above mentioned pkgs from the beginning, prepared a NMU of
the old packages, but now have new upstream packages ready.
My first try to contact the corresponding debian maintainer was mid Jan
2001. Feb 2nd i received:
> Are you alive?
Yes. Alive, but busy. I just st
> > > On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Hmm, the configure file should also check for ghttp.h, it didnt
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 06:21:13PM +0100, Martin Albert wrote:
> > This produces unnecessary hassles when, fo
On Saturday 24 February 2001 17:48, Eric VB wrote:
> Now if I add a line to debian/postrm.debhelper, everytime I re-build
> my package (dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot), this line is erased. Where
> do I have to declare my cutomized commands ?
>
> man dh_installdeb doesn't help and is a bit confused
Hello, ya all!
I chose the above mentioned pkgs from the beginning, prepared a NMU of
the old packages, but now have new upstream packages ready.
My first try to contact the corresponding debian maintainer was mid Jan
2001. Feb 2nd i received:
> Are you alive?
Yes. Alive, but busy. I just s
On Saturday 24 February 2001 14:22, Sam TH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yet another thing: your Build-depends seems wrong.
> > Policy says: 'A source package may declare a dependency or a
> > conflict on a binary package', but your are depending o
On Saturday 24 February 2001 14:22, Sam TH wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 12:25:01PM +0100,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Yet another thing: your Build-depends seems wrong.
> > Policy says: 'A source package may declare a dependency or a
> > conflict on a binary package', but your are depending
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:30:49AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > you also fail to install a menu file. I am coming up with a
> > lintian check for packages linked to X and not installing one. So
> > you reminded me of another bug (-:
No, i'm sure you wouldn't do that. :) libggi-target-
On Friday 16 February 2001 00:15, Martin Albert wrote:
> Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
>
> I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
And that was looong ago. Sorry, that i didn't say thanks to
Matt Zimmerman, Ingo Saitz, Brian Russo, Hamish Moffa
> On Fri, Feb 23, 2001 at 08:30:49AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > you also fail to install a menu file. I am coming up with a
> > lintian check for packages linked to X and not installing one. So
> > you reminded me of another bug (-:
No, i'm sure you wouldn't do that. :) libggi-target
On Friday 16 February 2001 00:15, Martin Albert wrote:
> Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
>
> I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
And that was looong ago. Sorry, that i didn't say thanks to
Matt Zimmerman, Ingo Saitz, Brian Russo, Hamish Moffa
Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
Two small (<10k) demos, where at least one is practically usable, this
is, would be nice to have it installed as binary, are to be installed
with the binary pkg.
The previous debian release has
Hello to all friendly people reading this ...
I'm pkging new upstream of a quite basic lib (libgii).
Two small (<10k) demos, where at least one is practically usable, this
is, would be nice to have it installed as binary, are to be installed
with the binary pkg.
The previous debian release ha
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 31-Jan-2001 Martin Albert wrote:
> > proper / practical ways to submit patches?
>
> what i do is:
> ..
> mv package package.shaleh
> dpkg-source -x package.dsc
> # the N makes it include files I
Hello!
I'm looking for info/doc/scripts/hints on proper / practical ways to
submit patches.
Of interest to me is also the proper way to generate a patch to a
single file - what is the best point in the dir structure to start?
Toplevel, ../Toplevel, ... ?
But currently i do have fixes for around
On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 31-Jan-2001 Martin Albert wrote:
> > proper / practical ways to submit patches?
>
> what i do is:
> ..
> mv package package.shaleh
> dpkg-source -x package.dsc
> # the N makes it include files I
Hello!
I'm looking for info/doc/scripts/hints on proper / practical ways to
submit patches.
Of interest to me is also the proper way to generate a patch to a
single file - what is the best point in the dir structure to start?
Toplevel, ../Toplevel, ... ?
But currently i do have fixes for around
I have picked up a new upstream source and packaged cthugha, which was
orphaned.
If somebody could sponsor the upload for me, I'd appreciate.
Deb-src line is:
deb-src
http://home.t-online.de/home/eislink/debian woody non-free
Download and info also on http://cthugha.debox.de
tnx and greetings,
I have picked up a new upstream source and packaged cthugha, which was
orphaned.
If somebody could sponsor the upload for me, I'd appreciate.
Deb-src line is:
deb-src
http://home.t-online.de/home/eislink/debian woody non-free
Download and info also on http://cthugha.debox.de
tnx and greetings
56 matches
Mail list logo
