According to [0], ultraeasy has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 802797
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
According to [0], cvars has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 802703 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
According to [0], python-ck has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #799268
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
According to [0], objeck-lang-i386 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
#775946 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
According to [0], rc has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 774573 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
According to [0], ip2location has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 768251
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
According to [0], pw3270 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 757180
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a sub
According to [0], libopenshot-audio has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
According to [0], libopenshot has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
According to [0], libde265 has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 740626
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
According to [0], hh has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 736672 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
According to [0], arnu has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 733022 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
According to [0], libvarnam has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 742309
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], python-nameparser has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
736281 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
Roberto Luiz Debarba writes:
> I'm working yet.
An ITP (Intent to Package) bug should be done before you start working,
to try to avoid that anyone else starts to work on the same package. So,
if you're working on this package, an ITP bug should exist.
Cheers.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
According to [0], arnu has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 733022 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subjec
According to [0], deal.ii has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 734125
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
g you as the owner of the ITA fixed the issue.
In any case, don't worry about that, the issue is fixed now :)
Cheers!
> > On Nov 2, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Mònica Ramírez Arceda
> > wrote:
> >
> > According to [0], sane-backends has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite
According to [0], sane-backends has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite
728292 title.
Please, could you retitle #728292 to mark it as an ITA bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debia
According to [0], wiktionarytodict has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
724896 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
According to [0], metar has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 723582 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
retitle 682716 ITP: yadifa -- name server
owner 682716 martijn cielen
thanks
On Thu, 2013-08-29 at 14:03 +0200, martijn cielen wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I would still like to see yadifa packaged, but I don't have any spare
> time at the moment. Could you rename the bug for me?
Done!
--
To UNSUBSC
Hi,
Are you still interested in packaging yadifa? If you are not, please close this
bug.
Otherwise, could you retitle #682716 to ITP?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archi
Hi,
Are you still interested in packaging clean-compiler? If you are not, please
close this bug.
Otherwise, could you retitle #682680 to ITP?
Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.o
According to [0], feincms-elephantblog has not its corresponding ITP bug,
despite 717733 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.
According to [0], sosreport has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 717931
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
El dv 19 de 07 de 2013 a les 09:16 +0400, en/na Anton Balashov va
escriure:
> Thank you for your pay attention on that.
> I made a new letter:
> From: Anton Balashov
> To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: ITP: curseofwar/1.1.4-1
> With the same text.
> Is that right?
No, you should open an ITP
According to [0], curseofwar has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 717262
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
According to [0], goodbye has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 716905
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 21:55 +0900, Mitsuya Shibata wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/7/3 Mònica Ramírez :
> >> > Sponsorship requests should not be assigned to wnpp package.
> >> > I'm undoing last actions sent to control server.
> >>
> >> H
Hi!
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:14 +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:25:51 +0200
> Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
> > Sponsorship requests should not be assigned to wnpp package.
> > I'm undoing last actions sent to control server.
>
> How do we han
According to [0], rekonq has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
requests should not be assigned to wnpp package.
I'm undoing last actions sent to control server.
Cheers,
Mònica
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://l
According to [0], simplenat has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble
According to [0], ctesf has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 712799 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subje
According to [0], distkeys has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
According to [0], ctesf-console has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite
712805 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
wit
According to [0], orientdb has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite 712806
title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a s
According to [0], bittwist has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
Hi,
According to [0], freeplane has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite 704789
title.
In fact, freeplane package is not orphaned:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/freeplane
You may get in touch with freeplane maintainer and ask him if he wants to
orphan this package or co-maintain it with you.
According to [0], tilda has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite #702072
title.
#583248 and #695574 show that this package is not being maintained,
but I think you should get in contact with MIA Team to ask
them to orphan tilda. Then, you could adopt it with the correspondign ITA bug.
Thank
Hi,
According to [0], there is not the corresponding ITP bug for this
package. You should file it and close it in your debian/changelog file.
Thanks!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.o
According to [0], szg has not its corresponding ITP bug, despite #691270
title. Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], mysql-tzdata has not its corresponding ITP bug.
Please, could you file it?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], jampal has not its corresponding ITP bug. This bug is
needed because jampal has been removed from Debian.
If you want to reintroduce the package, please, could you file this ITP
bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencie
Hi,
According to [0], fvwm has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite
#689441 title.
Please, could you file this ITA bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
According to [0], sweethome3d-furnitures-nonfree has not its
corresponding ITP bug, despite #689167 title.
Please, could you file this ITP bug?
Thanks for your work!
[0]
http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
ave more courage or time than you, I'm only trying to do
it :-)
But as you saw, it's not an easy package. Any help is welcome! (In fact,
you're already helping answering all my quesions! Further below you have
more...)
> > On 15/05/11 13:22, Mònica Ramírez Arceda wrote:
>
El dg 15 de 05 de 2011 a les 13:10 +0200, en/na Arno Töll va escriure:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi Mònica
> > * Licenses: this package has quite a lot of licenses, one of the
> > licenses is GPL (without the version). Is it a problem?
doesn't exist in Debian, for now.
But I don't understand what I have to do when I have these changes :-(
Thanks a lot for your help,
Mònica
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
hanks at advance for your help :-)
Mònica
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/533589
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/626243
[2] http://commons.apache.org/sanselan/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El dg 23 de 01 de 2011 a les 13:34 +0100, en/na Fabrizio Regalli va
escriure:
> Hi,
>
>
> Il giorno sab, 22/01/2011 alle 18.28 +0100, Mònica Ramírez Arceda ha
> scritto:
> > Hi,
> >
> > El dv 21 de 01 de 2011 a les 18:30 +0100, en/na Fabrizio Regalli va
El ds 22 de 01 de 2011 a les 21:33 +0100, en/na Jakub Wilk va escriure:
> * Mònica Ramírez Arceda , 2011-01-22, 18:28:
> >* debian/install: some lines have absolute path and others relative
> >path. Absolute paths are wrong: you should convert absolute paths to
> >relative.
&g
to Debian.
I haven't tested the application and I think a deeper review is needed
by a developer with more experience than me (and a review of my review
is also appreciated!).
I hope my advices are helpful.
Mònica
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
tream
and you're the upstreamer, you can change it in upstream code before
packaging.
* Ustream source checking:
- Upstream source should be licensed.
I haven't checked how program works.
If any other person from the list sees a mistake in my review, "reviews of my
review" are welcomed!
Cheers,
Mònica
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/upgrading-checklist.txt
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
El dj 11 de 11 de 2010 a les 12:52 +0100, en/na Alexander
Reichle-Schmehl va escriure:
> HI!
>
> Am 11.11.2010 12:48, schrieb Mònica Ramírez Arceda:
>
> > * Lintian: W: clipit source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.4
> > (current is 3.9.1)
> > You should
lightweight GTK+ clipboard manager
> >
> > The package appears to be lintian clean.
> >
> > The upload would fix these bugs: 603131
>
> I just did a quick review of your package:
Sorry, I have sent a review that Benoît just done...
Cristian: I think you can
can check this [1]
I hope my advises help you :-)
If any other person from the list sees a mistake in my review, "reviews
of my review" are welcomed!
Cheers.
--
Mònica
[1]
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libfontconfig.so.1 could be
avoided if "debian/clipit/usr/bin/clipi
On Friday 05 November 2010 at 00:26:51, Alberto Fernández wrote:
> El jue, 04-11-2010 a las 10:11 +0100, Mònica escribió:
> > On Wednesday 03 November 2010 at 23:23:54, Alberto Fernández wrote:
> > > El mié, 03-11-2010 a las 10:55 +0100, Mònica escribió:
[...]
> > > I do
Hi!
On Thursday 04 November 2010 at 12:17:39, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Am 04.11.2010 12:11, schrieb Mònica:
>
> > This program uses a library that is not free
> > (AppleJavaExtensions.jar). Apparently, the use of this library is
> > only to
Hello,
On Thursday 04 November 2010 at 12:15:41, Julien Viard de Galbert wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:11:10PM +0100, Mònica wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> Hello,
>
> > I am trying to package bluej [1], a Java program, but I think there is a
> > license proble
dered as a
non-free software, although I make this changes? If it is considered as
non-free software, I'm not interested in packaging it...
What do you do in this cases? What do you recommend?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=585696
--
Mònica
signature.asc
Description:
On Wednesday 03 November 2010 at 23:23:54, Alberto Fernández wrote:
> El mié, 03-11-2010 a las 10:55 +0100, Mònica escribió:
>
> Thanks very much for your help.
> I've just uploaded a fixed package with your suggestions.
:-)
> > I'm not a DD, but here's my
help you :-)
If any other person from the list see a mistake in my review, "reviews of my
review" are welcomed!
Cheers.
--
Mònica
"Normalment, només se'ns reconeix el dret de pensar quan pensem dins d'un dels
corrents que cada època considera legítims; és a dir quan pensem el menys
possible."
Manuel de Pedrolo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
be there are people (like me) who want to
help
Debian in general and don't have interest in a concrete package, but want to
contribute
to Debian on the whole.
If this workshop is done (and I'm not sleeping or working), be sure I'll be
there :-)
Cheers.
--
Mònica
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
A Dijous, 21 d'octubre de 2010 11:44:40, Sven Hoexter va escriure:
> On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 11:25:20AM +0200, Mònica wrote:
>
> > I think it's everything solved, but I'm sorry I don't understand what you
> > mean with "the linking in debia/rule
Hi again,
A Dimecres, 20 d'octubre de 2010 12:13:50, Sven Hoexter va escriure:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 12:09:05PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Mònica wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA
A Dimecres, 20 d'octubre de 2010 12:09:05, Jan Hauke Rahm va escriure:
> Hi Mònica,
>
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 11:49:29AM +0200, Mònica wrote:
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for a QA upload for the package "xsol", a
> > soli
rib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xsol/xsol_0.31-6.dsc
Kind regards
Mònica Ramírez Arceda
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=554721
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hi,
A Dimarts, 12 d'octubre de 2010 01:26:44, Asheesh Laroia va escriure:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010, Mònica wrote:
>
> > Dear mentors,
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for a new version 0.9.6-3
> > of the package "c2html".
>
> Hi Mònica,
>
age for me.
Kind regards,
Mònica
71 matches
Mail list logo
