El dg 03 de 11 de 2013 a les 08:23 -0500, en/na Mark Buda va escriure: > I am confused. 728292 is an RFS, 688531 is the ITA. And neither is mentioned > in that link. > > What am I not understanding?
This link is generated twice a day. It may be a temporary mistake or maybe setting you as the owner of the ITA fixed the issue. In any case, don't worry about that, the issue is fixed now :) Cheers! > > On Nov 2, 2013, at 11:16 AM, Mònica Ramírez Arceda <mon...@debian.org> > > wrote: > > > > According to [0], sane-backends has not its corresponding ITA bug, despite > > 728292 title. > > Please, could you retitle #728292 to mark it as an ITA bug? > > > > Thanks for your work! > > > > [0] http://qa.debian.org/~bartm/wnpp-rfs-mentors/wnpp-inconsistencies.txt > > > > > > > > -- > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > listmas...@lists.debian.org > > Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131102151632.ga7...@debian.org > >
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
