Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Patrick Matthäi schrieb:
>> Serafeim Zanikolas schrieb:
>> 1) As I understand the ITA from Luk he wants to have a co-maint (and not
>> completly give up the package):
>> "I request assistance with maintaining the update-inetd package.
>
>> I've quite recently taken over t
Michele Baldessari wrote:
> Hi Luk,
>
> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 07:43 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Michele Baldessari wrote:
>>> So I removed the postinst change and changed dh_fixperms appropriately
>>> in trunk. Thanks for noticing and let me know if you'd like
Michele Baldessari wrote:
> Hi Luk,
>
> On Wed, 2008-12-10 at 23:49 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
>> [Note: I'm not subscribed to the list, please Cc me in replies.]
>
> Sorry for the late reply, but you misstyped my e-mail (puparazzo instead
> of pupazzoo)
> so I m
Hi
[Note: I'm not subscribed to the list, please Cc me in replies.]
Your package [1] has a dpatch in debian/patches, but there doesn't seem
to be any rule to actually (de)apply it nor any build dependency on dpatch?
I thought dpkg-statoverride was meant to make it possible for the
sysadmin to ov
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 06:03:14PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
Hi
> This thread started on [EMAIL PROTECTED] The process that should be followed
> for
> 0-day NMUs is being discussed. (reminder: it's allowed to do 0-day NMUs
> for RC bugs and release goals, for bugs older than 7 days).
>
the Uploader in debian/changelog doesn't match
an uid of the key (sponsoring) AFAIK.
Cheers
Luk
PS: This kind of questions should be sent to debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
- --
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999
underrepresented in Debian :-)
Cheers
Luk
--
Luk Claes - http://people.debian.org/~luk - GPG key 1024D/9B7C328D
Fingerprint: D5AF 25FB 316B 53BB 08E7 F999 E544 DE07 9B7C 328D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adam Majer wrote:
> Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>
>
>>Hi folks, I have a noob question for you. I maintain the Cogito package
>>(my first), and it wants to install an executable as /usr/bin/git. The
>>GNU Interactive Tools package (git) also wants t
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Mauro Darida wrote:
> hello,
Hi
> in my package debianadv I have dh_strip in debian/rules. Since the only
> thing done at building time is the generation of a pdf file from a latex
> source, I think I can safely remove the dh_strip command.
> Do you confirm this?
Yes, you s
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Nigel Jones wrote:
> On 26/05/05, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > To do uploads, you need your public GPG key signed by a Debian Developer
> > > in the Debian keyring. This means for you to be a Debian Developer
> > > yourself, having passed the NM procedure wi
On Thu, 26 May 2005, [iso-8859-15] René van Bevern wrote:
> On 26.05.05, Li Daobing wrote:
>
> Hi,
Hi
> > I got an error message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when I dput
> > my qterm package, I think I should upload my public key to somewhere.
> > Anyone can tell me where is the place?
>
> To do upl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Neil Williams wrote:
> On Monday 16 May 2005 11:07 pm, Mauro Darida wrote:
>
>>I notice the following error at the end of a package session:
>>gpg: [stdin]: clearsign failed: secret key not available
>
>
> Create ~/.devscripts
>
> Add:
> DEBSIGN_KE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mauro Darida wrote:
> I notice the following error at the end of a package session:
> dpkg-deb: building package `debianadv' in
> `../debianadv_0.0.20050516-1_all.deb'.
> signfile debianadv_0.0.20050516-1.dsc
> gpg: skipped `Mauro Darida <[EMAIL PROT
Brett Meadors wrote:
Hi,
Hi Brett
I am possibly interested in finding a sponsor. I would like to help
with documentation, or maybe help with PR. I can provide more
information if necessary. I haven’t written much documentation for Open
source projects, but use words well and can provide a sim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Lemmen wrote:
| hi folks,
Hi Robert
| a while ago i was looking for a sponsor for check, but unfortunately i
| couldn't find one. so i try again ;)
|
| it's a very interesting package, lintian clean and builds under
| pbuilder. shouldn't have man
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Berg wrote:
| Re: Luk Claes in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|>| http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/lam/
|>
|>The problem is that this kind of URLs
|>(http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net) do not work with dehs.
|
|
| Of course yo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Berg wrote:
| Re: Roland Gruber in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|
|>>ftp://ftp2.sf.net//<2_first_letters>//
|>
|>so the problem might be that I use HTTP in my watch line?
|
|
| I'd always use http in favour of ftp. ftp is obsolete.
|
| For sf.net, use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Roland Gruber wrote:
| Luk Claes schrieb:
|
|> It's indeed very strange. Someone suggested to use something like
|> ftp://ftp2.sf.net/l/la/lam/ldap-account-manager_(.*)\.tar\.gz though.
|>
|> Thus:
|>
ftp://ftp2.sf.net//<2_first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Luk Claes wrote:
| Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
| | On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:53:37PM +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
| |
| |
| |>I added a debian/watch file to my package ldap-account-manager some time
| |>ago. But the status on Debian Health is stil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
| On Thu, Jan 06, 2005 at 01:53:37PM +0100, Roland Gruber wrote:
|
|
|>I added a debian/watch file to my package ldap-account-manager some time
|>ago. But the status on Debian Health is still that no watch file is
|>existent.
|
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
| On Wednesday 17 November 2004 14.44, Stephan Beyer wrote:
|
|
|>Hm, there should be an official RFS database *suggest* ;)
|
|
| In theory most RFS should correspond to an ITP or ITA
Well mine do not corre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
| On Wednesday 17 November 2004 14.44, Stephan Beyer wrote:
|
|
|>Hm, there should be an official RFS database *suggest* ;)
|
|
| In theory most RFS should correspond to an ITP or ITA
Well mine do not correspo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mentors
I'm looking for (one time?) sponsor(s) for my packages as my regular
sponsor has still not responded. Is Stephen Stafford on vacation or is
he MIA?
All the packages are completely lintian and linda clean and can be found
on mentors.debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mentors
I'm looking for (one time?) sponsor(s) for my packages as my regular
sponsor has still not responded. Is Stephen Stafford on vacation or is
he MIA?
All the packages are completely lintian and linda clean and can be found
on mentors.debian.net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mentors, hi perl team
I'm looking for (one time?) sponsor(s) for my packages as my regular
sponsor hasn't responded (yet, in Cc).
All the packages are completely lintian and linda clean and can be found
on mentors.debian.net.
- - libanydata-perl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi mentors, hi perl team
I'm looking for (one time?) sponsor(s) for my packages as my regular
sponsor hasn't responded (yet, in Cc).
All the packages are completely lintian and linda clean and can be found
on mentors.debian.net.
- - libanydata-perl -- S
npages for instant and transpec
~ * debian/rules: transpec.1 -> transpec.5
~ * Transpec/docbook-to-man.ts added '//' for OPTION (UTF minus sign)
~ -- Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:18:11 +0200
It is lintian and linda clean and tested.
You can find the pac
or instant and transpec
~ * debian/rules: transpec.1 -> transpec.5
~ * Transpec/docbook-to-man.ts added '//' for OPTION (UTF minus sign)
~ -- Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:18:11 +0200
It is lintian and linda clean and tested.
You can find the package
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> Luk,
Hi Joe
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the 'dmalloc' package.
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> Luk,
Hi Joe
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > I am looking for a sponsor for the 'dmalloc' package.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Küster wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) wrote:
|
|
|>On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
|>
|>>Version: 5.3.0-4
|
| [...]
|
|>>Description: Debug memory allocation library - transition packa
: extra
Section: oldlibs
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: libdmalloc4-dev
Architecture: all
Filename: pool//dmalloc_5.3.0-4_all.deb
Size: 3864
MD5sum: 304a640eca7e362267e5e123b314274e
Description: Debug memory allocation library - transition package
~ This is an empty package which d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frank Küster wrote:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) wrote:
|
|
|>On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 04:59:35PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
|>
|>>Version: 5.3.0-4
|
| [...]
|
|>>Description: Debug memory allocation library - transition packa
ection: oldlibs
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: libdmalloc4-dev
Architecture: all
Filename: pool//dmalloc_5.3.0-4_all.deb
Size: 3864
MD5sum: 304a640eca7e362267e5e123b314274e
Description: Debug memory allocation library - transition package
~ This is an empty package which depen
Hi
dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
buildd.net???
So, what is wrong and when will dmalloc 5.3.0-3 be ready to enter testing?
Cheers
Luk
Hi
dmalloc is a valid candidate regarding pts, but is blocking itself
regarding bjorn.haxx.se and it isn't even built on arm regarding
buildd.net???
So, what is wrong and when will dmalloc 5.3.0-3 be ready to enter testing?
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj
Hi
xpat2 is installed for m68k a couple of days ago, though it isn't entering
testing because it has "not yet built on m68k"??
It has been built 2 times according buildd.d.o, it is installed according
to buildd.net, but waiting for a build according to bjorn.haxx.se/debian.
What is going wrong o
Hi
xpat2 is installed for m68k a couple of days ago, though it isn't entering
testing because it has "not yet built on m68k"??
It has been built 2 times according buildd.d.o, it is installed according
to buildd.net, but waiting for a build according to bjorn.haxx.se/debian.
What is going wrong o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
| I have one sponsored package in the archive (rsnapshot) and
| http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| shows me under Uninstallable->unstable->hurd-i386 sh.
|
| * What does uninstallable means here? missing dependencies
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christoph Wegscheider wrote:
| I have one sponsored package in the archive (rsnapshot) and
| http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| shows me under Uninstallable->unstable->hurd-i386 sh.
|
| * What does uninstallable means here? missing dependencies?
I
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Kevin Glynn wrote:
> The bug was tagged wontfix, woody. The bug has been fixed in versions
> later than woody. What should I do? Will this just hang around
> forever?
You should send a mail to the control server with tags - wontfix
(more info on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/s
On Mon, 2 Aug 2004, Kevin Glynn wrote:
> The bug was tagged wontfix, woody. The bug has been fixed in versions
> later than woody. What should I do? Will this just hang around
> forever?
You should send a mail to the control server with tags - wontfix
(more info on http://www.debian.org/Bugs/s
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libsm6 |
xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxaw7 (>> 4.1.0),
libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxmu6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxpm4 | xlibs
(>
thanks in advance
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA5puA5UTeB5t8Mo0RApMeAKCCHF34jVc5z2u9ZI4lcRjz6RKccQCfZJIL
eNDjk1X9E9NGTEtXmVpMbIY=
=2lox
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Source: dmalloc
Section: devel
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTEC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
| package.
You can find the package on mentors.debian.net.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA5pp65UTeB5t8Mo0RAkQ/AJ4ux4HNfm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
package.
It's an upload for a new upstream version.
Package: libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
Version: 1.1.3-1
Priority: optional
Section: perl
Maintainer: Luk Claes &l
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libice6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libsm6 |
xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libx11-6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxaw7 (>> 4.1.0),
libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxmu6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxpm4 | xlibs
(>> 4
in advance
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA5puA5UTeB5t8Mo0RApMeAKCCHF34jVc5z2u9ZI4lcRjz6RKccQCfZJIL
eNDjk1X9E9NGTEtXmVpMbIY=
=2lox
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Source: dmalloc
Section: devel
Priority: extra
Maintainer: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
| Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
| package.
You can find the package on mentors.debian.net.
Cheers
Luk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA5pp65UTeB5t8Mo0RAkQ/AJ4ux4HNfmU1Nebh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Would someone, please be so kind to upload my libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
package.
It's an upload for a new upstream version.
Package: libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
Version: 1.1.3-1
Priority: optional
Section: perl
Maintainer: Luk Claes &l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I have adopted the xpat2 package.
Would anybody be so kind to upload it, please?
Package: xpat2
Description: Generic patience game for X11
~ xpat2 is a generic patience game which can be used with different rule
~ sets. It does understand the ru
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I have adopted the xpat2 package.
Would anybody be so kind to upload it, please?
Package: xpat2
Description: Generic patience game for X11
~ xpat2 is a generic patience game which can be used with different rule
~ sets. It does understand the rules o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Ragwitz wrote:
| Package: libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
| Severity: wishlist
|
| A new upstream version (currently 1.1.3) is available on cpan. Please
| upgrade your package.
I have uploaded the package to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so I need a sponsor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Florian Ragwitz wrote:
| Package: libcgi-xmlapplication-perl
| Severity: wishlist
|
| A new upstream version (currently 1.1.3) is available on cpan. Please
| upgrade your package.
I have uploaded the package to [EMAIL PROTECTED], so I need a sponsor for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm looking for a sponsor for dmalloc. The package is DFSG free. It
consists of following binary packages:
Package: dmalloc
Description: Debug memory allocation library - transition package
~ This is an empty package which depends on libdmalloc4,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'm looking for a sponsor for dmalloc. The package is DFSG free. It
consists of following binary packages:
Package: dmalloc
Description: Debug memory allocation library - transition package
~ This is an empty package which depends on libdmalloc4, to
GCS wrote:
Dear Mentors,
Hi
I would like to ask help for my package, xmms-blursk, which exists in
the pool, and a great visualisation plugin for XMMS. I have two
questions, the first is about bug #243161, FTBFS on ia64. I think I have
fixed it, by removing config.sub in the clean target, and
GCS wrote:
Dear Mentors,
Hi
I would like to ask help for my package, xmms-blursk, which exists in
the pool, and a great visualisation plugin for XMMS. I have two
questions, the first is about bug #243161, FTBFS on ia64. I think I have
fixed it, by removing config.sub in the clean target, and let
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vous voulez être aider en français? Alors utilisez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Merci beaucoup.
> QUESTION:
> 1- Comment puis je terminer l'install de Kde pour avoir ma barre et les
> menus
> 2- Comment remédier pour que ce message E: error 1, ne se reprodui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vous voulez être aider en français? Alors utilisez
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Merci beaucoup.
> QUESTION:
> 1- Comment puis je terminer l'install de Kde pour avoir ma barre et les
> menus
> 2- Comment remédier pour que ce message E: error 1, ne se reprodui
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Hi, my name is Hector, from Argentina, i want to know where
> could i find a list of all pakages that are not translated to
> spanish languajes. I would like to contribute in the
> translations.
http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/es
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> Hi, my name is Hector, from Argentina, i want to know where
> could i find a list of all pakages that are not translated to
> spanish languajes. I would like to contribute in the
> translations.
http://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/es
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'd be very grateful for a sponsor for one or more of the folowing
packages:
libcgi-xmlapplication-perl -- Perl module for creating XML-DOM and OO
based CGI scripts
libcgi-xmlform-perl -- Perl module for reading/generating formatted XML
libdbix-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I'd be very grateful for a sponsor for one or more of the folowing
packages:
libcgi-xmlapplication-perl -- Perl module for creating XML-DOM and OO
based CGI scripts
libcgi-xmlform-perl -- Perl module for reading/generating formatted XML
libdbix-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What I did:
I put the *.deb, *.dsc, *.diff, *.orig.tar.gz in public_html/pool
I run dpkg-scanpackages pool /dev/null|gzip -9c> pool/Packages.gz in
public_html
I run dpkg-scansources pool|gzip -9c> pool/Sources.gz in public_html
I added deb-src http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
What I did:
I put the *.deb, *.dsc, *.diff, *.orig.tar.gz in public_html/pool
I run dpkg-scanpackages pool /dev/null|gzip -9c> pool/Packages.gz in
public_html
I run dpkg-scansources pool|gzip -9c> pool/Sources.gz in public_html
I added deb-src http
> >> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
> >> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
> >
> > Where can I find more information on that?
>
> Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
> (agrep is in non-free for other reas
> >> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
> >> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
> >
> > Where can I find more information on that?
>
> Sorry, I can't find the relevant patent. Probably I was mistaken
> (agrep is in non-free for other reas
> You need to change the following lines again:
>
>* New maintainer (closes #201365).
>* debhelper in Build-Depends (closes #190527).
>
> to insert ':' after the word 'closes'.
>
> To test your 'closes:' statement (there are other variations) against
> the regular expression, do something l
> You need to change the following lines again:
>
>* New maintainer (closes #201365).
>* debhelper in Build-Depends (closes #190527).
>
> to insert ':' after the word 'closes'.
>
> To test your 'closes:' statement (there are other variations) against
> the regular expression, do something l
> So nothing like logtail at all?
As I understand logtail monitors the changes in logfiles on different
servers (it even accounts for the changes due logrotate).
since shows a (some) couple of lines from the point(s) were the (local)
file argument(s) were last changed (this could be in the middle
> I believe your "closes" entries should match the expression,
>
> /closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+)*/ig
>
> listed by
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-
> upload-bugfix
>
> That is, the numbers should be prefixed by "#".
done
cheers
Luk
> Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >I am looking for a sponsor for since (see
> >http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
> I'm not an expert, but how about pointing out that you're intending to adopt
> the
> orphaned package since and that you have adde
> So nothing like logtail at all?
As I understand logtail monitors the changes in logfiles on different
servers (it even accounts for the changes due logrotate).
since shows a (some) couple of lines from the point(s) were the (local)
file argument(s) were last changed (this could be in the middle
> I believe your "closes" entries should match the expression,
>
> /closes:\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+(?:,\s*(?:bug)?\#\s*\d+)*/ig
>
> listed by
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-
> upload-bugfix
>
> That is, the numbers should be prefixed by "#".
done
cheers
Luk
--
> Luk Claes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >I am looking for a sponsor for since (see http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
> I'm not an expert, but how about pointing out that you're intending to adopt the
> orphaned package since and that you have added the (pr
Hi
I am looking for a sponsor for since (see
http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: tail(1) work-alike that saves and uses state information
since is a tail(1) work-alike that remembers how much of a file
you have viewed and displays only what's new when you next view
that fil
Hi
I am looking for a sponsor for since (see http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: tail(1) work-alike that saves and uses state information
since is a tail(1) work-alike that remembers how much of a file
you have viewed and displays only what's new when you next view
that file
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> >
> > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
>
> Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
>
> Hint: non-free is not par
> > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Of course it is this package.
> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 02:48:28PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
> > > Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
> >
> > A little bit more information would be appreciated.
>
> Well, you just failed Debian Philosophy 101.
>
> Hint: non-free is not par
> > There is an agrep package already in Debian:
> >
> > http://packages.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=agrep&searchon=names&subword=1&version=all&release=all
Of course it is this package.
> Huh? This package is *not* part of Debian.
A little bit more information would be
> > I am looking for a sponser for agrep
> > (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
>
> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that? (So I do not know if the paten
Hi
I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: Text search tool with support for approximate patterns
agrep is a version of standard UNIX grep with the following
enhancements:
o the ability to search for approximate patterns
o it is
> > I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
>
> Have the patent issues been resolved? IIRC, the SHIFT-AND algorithm has
> been patented, and no royalty-free license is available.
Where can I find more information on that? (So I do not know if the patent
iss
Hi
I am looking for a sponser for agrep (http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian)
Description: Text search tool with support for approximate patterns
agrep is a version of standard UNIX grep with the following
enhancements:
o the ability to search for approximate patterns
o it is
Hi
How does one make a package description where the line breaks at an
intended way?
See bug 180727.
All remarks are welcome.
Kind regards
Luk
---
GPG Fingerprint : C061 8F2E EA93 43DE 08D5 71EA 02DF 840B 1B57 0E7C
Hi
How does one make a package description where the line breaks at an
intended way?
See bug 180727.
All remarks are welcome.
Kind regards
Luk
---
GPG Fingerprint : C061 8F2E EA93 43DE 08D5 71EA 02DF 840B 1B57 0E7C
--
To UNSU
Hi
What does the folowing 'problem' mean:
The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day delay is
over.
Kind regards
Luk
---
GPG Fingerprint : C061 8F2E EA93 43DE 08D5 71EA 02DF 840B 1B57 0E7C
Hi
What does the folowing 'problem' mean:
The package has not yet entered testing even though the 10-day delay is
over.
Kind regards
Luk
---
GPG Fingerprint : C061 8F2E EA93 43DE 08D5 71EA 02DF 840B 1B57 0E7C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for the package translate-docformat which is
> > orphaned.
> >
> > Description: any-to-any document translation system
> >
> > This is a command-line front end to many document format translation
> > programs to facilitate the translation of documents from
> > one form
> > I'm looking for a sponsor for the package translate-docformat which is
> > orphaned.
> >
> > Description: any-to-any document translation system
> >
> > This is a command-line front end to many document format translation
> > programs to facilitate the translation of documents from
> > one form
other.
Currently it supports major formats like the docbook, linuxdoc, debiandoc,
and TeX, translating to HTML and ps and text.
If you are interested you can take a look at:
http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian/
Kind regards,
Luk Claes
PS: I have changed the bug title to ITA.
PS2: lintian has no complaints.
other.
Currently it supports major formats like the docbook, linuxdoc, debiandoc,
and TeX, translating to HTML and ps and text.
If you are interested you can take a look at:
http://studwww.ugent.be/~lukclaes/debian/
Kind regards,
Luk Claes
PS: I have changed the bug title to ITA.
PS2: lintian has no compl
> Include the following line in fda's changelog file:
>
> * New maintainer. (closes: #192657)
>
[snip]
> Repackage both fda and judy, and you'll be ready to look for a sponsor.
Should the Maintainer in the control file be changed or not?
Kind regards
Luk Claes
> Include the following line in fda's changelog file:
>
> * New maintainer. (closes: #192657)
>
[snip]
> Repackage both fda and judy, and you'll be ready to look for a sponsor.
Should the Maintainer in the control file be changed or not?
Kind regards
Luk Claes
--
96 matches
Mail list logo
