On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 11:28:08PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 03:21:19PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:22:42PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
>>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "colorcode".
>&
On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:22:42PM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "colorcode".
> * Package name: colorcode
> Version : 0.5.5-1
> Upstream Author : Dirk Laebisch
> * URL : http://colorcode.laebisch.com/
> * License : GP
On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 07:13:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> arch-specific builds run 'debian/rules build && $rootcmd
> debian/rules binary-arch' (where rootcmd is fakeroot or sudo). They
> can't do anything else, because the build-arch target is (still) not
> required.
Sure they can:
deb
On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 10:37:40AM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Apr 2009 10:19:19 +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote:
>> The Debian Multimedia Team likes to have packages on git.debian.org,
>> http://git.debian.org/git/pkg-multimedia/ .
> Here's how to have a git repository [0] created by
I'm not the maintainer, but still:
On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 10:55:52PM +0200, Jens Peter Secher wrote:
> - Why do you do a 'dh_installemacsen --flavor=emacs21' instead of just
> 'dh_installemacsen' in debian.rules? Is it because gnuserv is not
> needed for xemacs?
xemacs comes with its own gnus
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 05:34:32AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:21:49PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:22:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>>
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:33:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
mv -f Makefile Makefile.bak
imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/lib/X11/config
Imakefile.c:39: error: Imake.tmpl: No such file or di
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 10:21:49PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:22:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>
> > could someone sponsor xlife 5.0-7 for me please. It is just changes in
> > Build-Depends so it rebuilds against the new
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 05:22:38PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> could someone sponsor xlife 5.0-7 for me please. It is just changes in
> Build-Depends so it rebuilds against the new X11R7.
> http://mrvn.homeip.net/xlife/
I'm on it.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 11:53:20PM +0200, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 05:47:46PM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
>> Isn't debian/README.Debian the one you would like to edit?
> It might be. However, the included information is (probably) not
> useful to end users.
I use debi
Hi,
I'm trying to upload a new mailman package, but this is failing
utterly. Could someone please help me? Thanks in advance.
I'm uploading the exact packages at
http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/mailman/ with "dput" to the
anonymous queue on ftp-master. The upload goes well, I see them if I
ftp
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 06:55:11PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> I'm sending this to renew my RFC/RFS, and also to notice I moved all the
> files needed for beef in a new location.
> The new URLs are:
> * http://www.kiyuko.org/debian/beef_0.0.3.orig.tar.gz
> * http://www.kiyuko.or
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote:
> * Package name: wengophone
> Upstream Author : Wengo SAS
> Description : A free SIP softphone
You may want to do it in the framework of the Debian VoIP packaging
team.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAI
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:23:23PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Dec 2005 19:59:07 -0200, Rogério Brito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> Ah yeah, this seems to contain the information. Thanks a lot. Is
>>>
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 05:37:11PM -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> On Dec 25 2005, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> I can't find any mention of the configure script of packages in
>> section 6 of the policy.
> But you question below left me with an impression that it could be
On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 09:24:38AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:47:46PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 25, 2005 at 01:32:53PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>> I can't find any mention of the configure script of packages in
>
Hi,
I can't find any mention of the configure script of packages in
section 6 of the policy. Can somebody please point me to a reference
of how and when it is run (what arguments, etc)?
Thanks,
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 11:04:15PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:32:08PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 06:02:56PM +0200, Matthijs Mohlmann wrote:
>>> Reupload to unstable with:
>>> package (2.9.
n all archs. Waste
of resources, but OK, thanks.
> Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> Let's suppose I have uploaded a highly experimental new version of a
>> package to experimental to get some testing. Weeks later, it (the
>> parts changed wrt to the version sid) has been thorough
Hi,
Let's suppose I have uploaded a highly experimental new version of a
package to experimental to get some testing. Weeks later, it (the
parts changed wrt to the version sid) has been thoroughly tested, and
I want to move it to unstable.
How do I do that? Do I have to make a _new_ version, whos
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 08:35:17PM +0200, Daniele Sempione wrote:
> This is my first debian package and my first request for sponsor, I
> don't know if I should link now the .changes, .dsc, .orig.tar.gz,
> .diff.gz, and .deb, so I'll link them only on demand.
Prospective sponsors will want to see
On Sat, Aug 27, 2005 at 05:17:14PM -0300, Rogério Brito wrote:
>> Stephen and I share access to a CVS repository on one of my systems
>> for this and other projects, but access to it doesn't scale well.
>> Moving to an alioth project probably makes the most sense, as
>> that's a Debian resource an
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:10:50AM +0200, Adrian von Bidder wrote:
> IIRC the problem with 'public domain' is that in some parts of the
> world (most of europe certainly, perhaps others) there is no such
> concept.
There is a concept of public domain, but it is impossible for the
author to elevat
Hi, Filippo! So, it is "GNU polyxmass", now? You are an official GNU
project and all. Congratulations.
(We'll continue the rest of the discussion by private mail, shall we?)
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Apart from those lintian W/E messages, the packages are
Hi, Filippo! So, it is "GNU polyxmass", now? You are an official GNU
project and all. Congratulations.
(We'll continue the rest of the discussion by private mail, shall we?)
On Sun, Feb 08, 2004 at 10:19:45AM +0100, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Apart from those lintian W/E messages, the packages are
In agreement with the current maintainer, I intend to take over the
scsh Debian package. scsh is a Scheme implementation tuned for writing
shell scripts. I have already prepared a package that closes most open
bugs. Here's the changelog:
scsh (0.6.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream relea
In agreement with the current maintainer, I intend to take over the
scsh Debian package. scsh is a Scheme implementation tuned for writing
shell scripts. I have already prepared a package that closes most open
bugs. Here's the changelog:
scsh (0.6.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream relea
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:55:26PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> Is there a document somewhere that describes the assumptions I can
> make in a debian/rules file?
Debian policy?
> For instance, as part of my work to be a DD, I'm working on a
> package that makes a kernel module.
For that particular
On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:55:26PM -0700, Al Stone wrote:
> Is there a document somewhere that describes the assumptions I can
> make in a debian/rules file?
Debian policy?
> For instance, as part of my work to be a DD, I'm working on a
> package that makes a kernel module.
For that particular
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:36:51PM -0500, Morgon Kanter wrote:
>> So can anyone tell me, where to turn in search of CVS space?
> Have you tried sourceforge? ( http://sourceforge.net )
I suggest you avoid SourceForge. See
http://fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-10-20-01.en.html for the
reasons.
But
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 06:36:51PM -0500, Morgon Kanter wrote:
>> So can anyone tell me, where to turn in search of CVS space?
> Have you tried sourceforge? ( http://sourceforge.net )
I suggest you avoid SourceForge. See
http://fsfeurope.org/news/article2001-10-20-01.en.html for the
reasons.
But
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:12:42PM +, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> My package "declares a build time dependency on libapm-dev which
> cannot be satisfied on sh."
> But... What is "sh"?
A platform Debian runs on (a "port").
http://www.debian.org/ports/ lists them all, and there you can read:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2003 at 05:12:42PM +, Karl E. Jorgensen wrote:
> My package "declares a build time dependency on libapm-dev which
> cannot be satisfied on sh."
> But... What is "sh"?
A platform Debian runs on (a "port").
http://www.debian.org/ports/ lists them all, and there you can read:
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
> 1. What do I need to do to give my intention to package the said
> orphaned package?
Retitle the wnpp bug that declares it orphaned to start with "ITA: "
and not "O: " any more.
--
Lionel
On Tue, Mar 11, 2003 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Paolo Alexis Falcone wrote:
> 1. What do I need to do to give my intention to package the said
> orphaned package?
Retitle the wnpp bug that declares it orphaned to start with "ITA: "
and not "O: " any more.
--
Lionel
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
Hi,
I've packaged uf-view, a viewer for some comics distributed online for
the GNOME environment (RFP bug #86005). I'm looking for a sponsor for
it.
Only thing special about it is that upstream doesn't provide a
manpage. I've written one. This excluded, it is a pretty standard
automake/autoconf p
Hi,
I've packaged uf-view, a viewer for some comics distributed online for
the GNOME environment (RFP bug #86005). I'm looking for a sponsor for
it.
Only thing special about it is that upstream doesn't provide a
manpage. I've written one. This excluded, it is a pretty standard
automake/autoconf p
Hi,
I've adopted gnotepad+, and its documentation gnotepad+-help. As I'm
not (yet) a Debian Developer, I'm looking for a sponsor. (This is my
second package. I thought I would spread the sponsoring load, so as
not to concentrate it on one person. My first sponsor will be my
advocate. Thank you.) g
Hi,
I've adopted gnotepad+, and its documentation gnotepad+-help. As I'm
not (yet) a Debian Developer, I'm looking for a sponsor. (This is my
second package. I thought I would spread the sponsoring load, so as
not to concentrate it on one person. My first sponsor will be my
advocate. Thank you.) g
39 matches
Mail list logo
