On Sat, May 24, 2014 at 04:54:40PM +0200, Hugo Lefeuvre wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "top"
>
> Package name: top
> Version : 2.2.3-1
> Upstream Author : Hugo Pereira Da Costa
> URL : http://hugo.pereira.free.fr/software/
> License
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:42:26PM +0100, Dennis van Dok wrote:
> Hi,
>
> my colleague has updated some of the packages for which I am the
> maintainer, and he is an uploader. The last changelog entry is by him.
>
> When I tried to upload to mentors, the package was refused and my
> colleague got
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 04:16:31PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > > > Thanks Kumar - the "-k " did it! I saw it in --help, but I
> > > > didn't think I would need it if I only had the one key. Why didn't I
> > > > try it?!?
> > > You don't need to pass -k or similar options to any Debian tool
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 02:41:02AM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> > > Personally, I use debsign -k to ensure
> > > that my package is signed. Following this, you can open the
> > > changes file and the dsc file to see that they have been
> > > clearsigned.
> >
> > Thanks Kumar - the "-k " d
On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 08:23:06PM +0200, Ross Gammon wrote:
> On 08/10/2013 06:17 PM, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Personally, I use debsign -k to ensure
> > that my package is signed. Following this, you can open the
> > changes file and the dsc file to see that they have
dillo3
Architecture: source amd64
Version: 1:3.900.2+dfsg-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
Changed-By: Kumar Appaiah
Description:
libarmadillo-dev - streamlined C++ linear algebra library - Headers
libarmadillo3 - streamlined C++ linear algebra library
oad.
> * Upload to unstable
> * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Fix compiler links with host names.
> Closes: #502377
> * Patch from Kumar Appaiah: Add gfortran support. Closes: #502379
I just wanted to point out that there is an extraneous "755"
directory. Probably a re
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 10:20:29PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Kumar Appaiah writes:
>
> > Pardon me if I miss something, but is it prudent to alter upstream's
> > license without their permission in the source? Granted, it's just an
> > address change which
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:57:18PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> Matt Kraai writes:
>
> > Some of the copyright notices in a package I'm trying to create refer
> > to the old address of the FSF and lintian warns about it. Should I
> > fix this address? If so, should I fix it in both the copyright
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 12:08:02PM +0100, Tim Retout wrote:
> On 22 October 2010 10:32, Mats Erik Andersson
> wrote:
> > However, and this is my present question to you,
> > would the release team decline the package due
> > a decision to migrate to format 3.0 already now?
>
> Possibly, at this s
Dear Tony,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:34:38PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> On 12/10/10 00:50, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> >
> > I'll take this. The change seems minimal, so I'll sponsor it. Please
> > be sure to request the release team for a freeze exception.
>
Hi!
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 06:37:49PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> The upload would fix these bugs: 598971
>
> The bug can affect which environment variables roxterm decides to set or
> change in its child shells. The specific problem experienced in Ubuntu
> Maverick (not setting TERM correctly
On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 03:48:08PM -0500, Asheesh Laroia wrote:
> (Other Debian mentors -- is it okay to upload a package whose version is
> 0.2-3 or 0.2-4 as the first Debian upload? Or should we instead rewrite
> history and pretend this is 0.2-1 when it's ready to go?)
The short answer is,
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 08:34:49AM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
[snipped OP's exampl
> Won't work. :-) Check one of the several bugs which were just "closed"
> from the BTS. Randomly, I'll point you to this one:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi
Hi!
Let me address each point separately.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 02:22:03PM +0100, Ersek, Laszlo wrote:
> Rogério Brito has submitted a wishlist bug report for lbzip2 [3]. As
> Rogério has accepted my proposal to use an external tool for his
> need, I'd like to close the bug with a wontfix tag.
uploaded this package for me.
>
Done. But please mail debian-mentors again for the next sponsorship
request, since I may not be a regular sponsor.
Thanks a lot!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
de
>
> How'd you get those mixed up!?
Copy pasting error?
In any case, I have uploaded this as well.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
rust your
judgement, so I have uploaded it to unstable.
I hope your key is updated real soon!
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:50 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> > That is absolutely what I was looking for ...
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
>
> Sorry , but one think I don't understand:
>
> HOOKDIR="/path/to/hook/dir"
This has to be set in your pbuilderrc. I have a ~/.pbuilderrc in my
home,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> > If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu
>> > here.
>> > I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
>> > Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
>>
>> The first section here
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
>> > If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu
>> > here.
>> > I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
>> > Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
>>
>> The first section here
2009/3/23 Jaromír Mikeš:
> If I will install newer perl from sid it will probably break my ubuntu here.
> I can't build in pbuilder coz missining dependencies.
> Can I somehow install manually dependencies to pbuilder chroot?
The first section here might help:
http://wiki.debian.org/PbuilderTricks
ors, warnings etc. being reported. The second way is to run
lintian-info --tags substvar-source-version-is-deprecated
which gives the necessary information.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:25:16PM +, Roger Leigh wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 08:19:38PM -0600, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > I was wondering if you could suggest a nice way to use pbuilder to
> > test package builds with gcc-snapshot.
>
> Just a note to point out that sb
/people.debian.org/~pabs/tmp/pbuilder.tar.gz
Thanks, but I really want it to be automated for gcc-snapshot, so the
solution you suggest with the original trick on the Wiki works
perfectly for me.
Thanks for the information. I have updated the Wiki as well.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ng gcc-snapshot testing with pbuilder?
Either way, I promise to update the wiki page with the solution I get,
and will then request the person filing the gcc-snapshot FTBFS bugs to
point to that page, if possible.
Thanks in advance.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 11:54:41AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Kumar Appaiah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (01/11/2008):
> > The most foolproof way of testing whether the package in question
> > builds in pbuilder. pbuilder starts with a clean chroot, downloads the
> > build
that most likely points to a
serious bug.
You can find the documentation of pbuilder here:
http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/software/pbuilder-doc/pbuilder-doc.html
Hope this helps; else please tell me if I have misunderstood
something.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bian.org/debian/sid main
The entries you want would be:
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sid main
deb-src http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian sid main
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
only Debian developers have access to
such machines, and you may have to directo your architecture spcific
queries and requests to debian-@lists.debian.org.
HTH.
Kumar
P.S. Please don't recycle threads.
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 03
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 02:59:12PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > When I look at a diff.gz, I use "zgrep '^+++ ' foo.diff.gz". If the
>
> zcat foo.diff.gz | diffstat
Just for the record, diffstat foo.diff.gz would do. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar App
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 10:40:51PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Hello Mentors,
>
> Please can you tell me the BTS/PTS command (and the E-Mail)
> which I must use to get all messages to a Bug#.
If you need an mbox:
bts --mbox show
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Ho
You give Britney 5 days for a
transition attempt.
urgency=high: For fixing critical bugs (esp. security). 2 days for
transition.
Please see:
http://www.debian.org/devel/testing
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nsor it. (but as I saw now, I forgot to CC
> him, so he doesn't get that email, since he wasn't subscribed.).
Argh! Yes, I am sorry. The first package on that list, which is
yorick-spydr, was uploaded by Christoph. The second one, naturally,
says winnie. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
t was Christoph Haas. You can find out by going to your QA page, and
putting the mouse over the NEW link:
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Once uploaded, you may wish to use the who-uploads package in
devscripts.
HTH.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Techno
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:21:24AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > (Removing CC to debian-mips, as your last mail got the point across).
>
> Well, that was on purpose...
I know, and that was the right thing.
> > > Enjoy 4.3 serie
(Removing CC to debian-mips, as your last mail got the point across).
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:01:55AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> On 05/02/2008, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > lam FTBFSing on mipsel due to a gcc bug:
> > http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=lam&ve
and doing a dput/dupload
of packages built on them. Would look awesome to stand apart with a
mips(el) or s390 upload, when others are doing only
source+{i386,amd64}. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ail. It doesn't seem to build if I do
dpkg-buildpackage;dpkg-buildpackage. Am I doing something wrong?
2. Priority should be `optional', not extra.
3. Please don't use smileys in the description. :-)
There may be a few more issues, I'll let a DD suggest these, as I also
have s
intian -i -I on the changes file, and
observe the warnings and advice to correct them. If you go through
these steps carefully once, it'll be very easy to do them the next
time onwards.
I'll check your package again tomorrow, but if someone else
(preferably a DD) comes up for checking
ea; here are a few:
http://qa.debian.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of course, consider joining the Python Application Team as well.
Hope the input is useful.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 12:23:49PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Well, I've filed one already with a patch and severity serious! It
> does affect common behaviour from earlier though. Let me downgrade it
> if it comes to that, or the maintainer objects.
OK, the verdict from #
dev,
and not one of them. I don't want atlas3 coming in.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:49:53AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> See this old log. The apt-get command follows the same order as
> specified in the package's Build-Depends:
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=octave2.9&ver=1%3A2.9.17-1&arch=sparc&stamp=1195174
w, if apt-get is
called faithfully in this order, atlas does not come in. But if it is
reordered, the lapack3-dev dependencies are honoured first, and that
pulls in atlas3-base, which is the first alternate dependency, and is
satisfiable.
Now, the question is, where is the reordering
(Annotation at the end)
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 10:30:14AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Debian Mentors,
>
> This is with reference to a package of mine, libitpp, whose latest
> version I have packaged and it is available at:
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/p
= 5), autotools-dev, doxygen (>= 1.5.1-1),
refblas3-dev, libfftw3-dev, texlive-latex-base, gs, lapack3-dev
Clearly, refblas3-dev is provided, so lapack3-dev shouldn't need
atlas3-base-dev, right? What am I missing?
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:18:30AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > - dget
> > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mustang/mustang_3.0-1.dsc
> >
> > I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
>
> I am not a DD, but want to just make some mino
es enter sid (unstable).
Otherwise, I think it's fine. A DD's eye can spot further
problems. :-)
All the best!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
of them) enter , and are meant for, sid. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
owto.html
HTH. Look forward to your contributions to Debian! :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
oing anything except removing
> files when repackaging.
If this is the case, I shall try to avoid it in the next revision.
Thanks for pointing this out.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
r changes,
> and that's in the .diff.gz (directly or through a patch system, whatever
> you prefer).
I agree on this, and you are very correct. But my mentor recommended
the change, as we were repackaging it anyway. Besides, noting whatever
I've done in README.Debian-source does alle
aused some build failed for some
reason (I don't recall, but my mentor asked me to do it). Also, my
patches looked too ugly.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
hat it was
> 'backported' from svn?
Again, this is also a debatable one. But since you are repackaging,
you might want to merge these changes from upstream, or patch them,
without hurting anyone's sentiments. But I think more knowledgeable
persons should answer this. :-)
Kumar
ou just can't build
it using GCJ, then you may try kaffe or jikes, but I don't know too
much about them.
See any of the packages maintained by pkg-java-maintainers. For example,
commons-io is a simple one. They all use cdbs for building, and it
should be quite simple to adapt the a
, you could see jftp, except that it's in contrib, but you may be
able to get it into main if you get it to build it with a free Java
compiler like gcj. Or, see the pkg-java list for a bigger list.
> I hope you can help me.
Come to debian-java for more. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Ja
there are two other ways:
1. Systematic: ITA+Upload.
2. Not recommended: Hijack+Upload. :-)
3. Plain NMU.
This is just to make the point clear...
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:59:46PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Put a file called manpages in the Debian directory (or
> /manpages, in case you use multiple packages). The contents
Sorry, it should be .manpages.
> of this file should be:
>
> debian/qavimator.6
>
> Tha
rk?"
No issue. Just ensure that you version your tarballs with epoch etc.
For example, foo-1.2.3+svn20071015-1 could be the version. If they
don't have any version (like 1.2.3), you may artifically add 0 and
make the Debian version foo-0+svn20071015-1. Ensure you name your
orig.tar.gz
ice comparison:
http://gmane.org/plot-rate.php?group=gmane.linux.debian.user
http://gmane.org/plot-rate.php?group=gmane.linux.debian.devel.general
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
in /usr/share/doc-base, that uses the new sections defined in the latest
> menu policy.
I agree with you on this one. Only meny issues are flagged by lintian,
and I am not aware of doc-base files.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai
> of Apps, ...) in .doc-base files? I checked the Wiki and the original
> thread about the transition but didn't find an answer to this question.
My lintian 1.23.34 already complains for "Apps" etc. So, I guess you
should use "Applications/...".
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
re/foo
Or if you want to copy the directory foo-1.2/common-files to
/usr/share/foo/common-files, you can add an entry like:
common-files usr/share/foo
etc. Read man dh_install for details. Also dh_installdocs,
dh_installexamples and dh_install for more nie stuff.
HTH.
Kumar
--
ad it to Debian's repositories.
If you are intent on being the Debian package maintainer, thisis the
right place and people will guide you here.
All the best!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
inelegant, but should work.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, try
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/, for example:
http://heanet.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/maxima/
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
suggest the -doc package.
We shall get down to this this evening. I have two questions:
1. Could you please consider adding kumanna-guest and varun-guest to
pkg-java? I have already mailed there in this regard.
2. Could I mail you in off-list, when I upload the revised package?
Thanks a lot!
Kum
ripping and no debug+no stripping.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
back to us with suggestions. Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
stripping
them may result in a slightly reduced performance (it's a numerical
computation library). While I am going to run some tests myself to
verify this, I just wanted to ask the mentors here about their
knowledge of this issue.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Inst
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 03:24:58AM +0200, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I could need some help with a debian/watch file :) In this special case
> I would like to create a debian/watch file for molekel
> (http://bioinformatics.org/molekel). Unfortunately upstream doesn't
> provide tarballs. So I
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 02:20:09PM +0200, Mario Iseli wrote:
> My education was: Every difference from the dh_make templates are bad,
> except if you have good reasons for it. But hmm, ok...
I agree, but I thought was a placeholder meant to be
replaced with just the URL. :-)
Kumar
--
the package
is, as such, quite small. But I also like the separate file way for
the reason that if upstream adds another file later, I just append it
there rather than look for it in rules...
Anyway, the latest one is available at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/logapp/logapp_0.
I just thought it was a good practice. But, I have now added
these things to rules and removed the separate files.
> debian/rules:
> Again two useless whitespaces behind the dh_clean lines...
Done.
> Regards and thanks for your work,
Thanks for your quick review! :-)
I have uplo
necessary amount, and all important lines are easy to identify.
.
Homepage: http://logapp.sourceforge.net/
Note that this package does not have anything to do with GNUstep,
though it ends with "app". :-)
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technol
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:16:12PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Oops! One more miss! getopt.c is also public domain!
>
> find |egrep "\.(h|c)$"|xargs grep -L "(GPL)" gives getopt.c,
> flickcurl_getopt.h and example.c
>
> I am reuploading with the modificati
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:08:49PM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > debian/copyright:
> > You have some useless whitespaces mostly at the end of the lines. Then
> > ehm: License: LGPL 2.1 / GPL 2 / Apache 2.0
> > What should that mean? If you have several licenses in your
on sponsors.debian.net, I use that to track my sponsoring
> and get in contact with me if you have fixed the things from above.
Well, thanks a lot! I have registered the package on
Sponsors.d.net. Please check it out, and many thanks for the review
and upload offer! :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
description, uploading photos, changing
tags and comments.
Thanks in advance.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
u say, the quality of the package in Debian is also
a function of the maintainer's familiarity with the package.
Thanks for the clarifications!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
> Therefore I actually am only insistent on the sources being available,
> since I usually discard the pre-build .debs anyway.
True, but I thought that if the maintainer discovers the problems
himself, it'd just save time for the sponsor. :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Ho
n constant time without making the
compiler or linker eat loads of memory.
Please do send me your comments, if you find something lacking. I
shall make the corrections and make a new upload later.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai
t to be sure that the packages are build on a clean, sid
chroot.
Thanks a lot!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
or non-executable scripts etc.
So, how do you propose to evaluate people? Though evaluation is
necessary, isn't it tough for people who don't really have a "FOSS
contributor" background?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ed?
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t;
> Because Python itself provides a XML implementation, in this case
> /usr/lib/python2.4/xml/parsers/expat.py.
That I realized after a relook. I guess performance is the criterion
for this choice, after reading up a bit.
Thanks for the suggestion!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, J
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:13:18PM +0200, Piotr Ozarowski wrote:
> thanks
Thanks from me too! :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
man.1 - escape hyphen ("\-") in line 116, 122, 126, 890, 921
Done.
Since a version bump is not necessary, please find the updated package
here:
dget -x
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/h/harvestman/harvestman_1.4.6-4.dsc
And thanks a lot for the quick response and sugge
e wondering what has suddenly rekindled my interest in
the package. It's just that upstream is developing a new version, and
I wanted to see what shape the package is in well before the next
upstream release.
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:27:35AM +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> echo -e "#!/bin/sh\nexec /usr/bin/python2.4 \
> /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/HarvestMan/harvestman.py \"[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]"" > harvestman
OK, so it's actually this:
echo -
make another
upload with Python 2.5 as current. Is that correct?
Thanks!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, if I run a wrapper installer they
provide, and I don't do that.
Or should I just create such a file of that type using dpatch? That
way, I keep the diff clean.
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
_ playing spoilsport), so
it's great that you have packaged it. All the best in finding a
sponsor!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
then copy it and set the permissions for it using install? Or is there
a more elegant way of getting over this?
Thanks.
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
yer
Priority: optional
Section: kde
Installed-Size: 2312
Maintainer: Debian KDE Extras Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: i386
Version: 1:0.9.4a-2
[snip]
Description: media player for KDE
KMPlayer is a simple frontend for MPlayer/Xine/ffmpeg/ffserver/VDR.
[snip]
Is it different?
On Sat, Jul 28, 2007 at 10:31:16PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Sponsored.
Thanks a lot, Christoph!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
458, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
wondering if someone would be interested in packaging it. It is
available at:
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pkpgcounter/pkpgcounter_2.18-1.dsc
It's lintian clean (I guess :-), but if you have suggestions for
improving or correcting the package, please do tell me.
Thanks!
Kumar
--
by the modified script:
> http://files.myopera.com/atomo64/files/output.test.html
Very nice!
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ptions to check this are available (courtesy this thread). So, don't
bother too much; that page is going away in a while! :-)
Kumar
--
Kumar Appaiah,
462, Jamuna Hostel,
Indian Institute of Technology Madras,
Chennai - 600 036
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
1 - 100 of 162 matches
Mail list logo
