Re: RFS: upnp-router-control

2010-05-13 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Daniele, I've uploaded a new version of the package. Please see if it's OK. My copy of lintian still complains: W: upnp-router-control: new-package-should-close-itp-bug E: upnp-router-control: possible-missing-colon-in-closes Closes #570118 W: upnp-router-control: extended-description-line

Re: RFS: upnp-router-control

2010-05-12 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Daniele, There is anyone that can sponsor it? Please fix the lintian errors and warnings: W: upnp-router-control source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.8.3 (current is 3.8.4) E: upnp-router-control: copyright-contains-dh_make-todo-boilerplate W: upnp-router-control: new-package-should-cl

Re: RFS: snmpdump

2008-05-10 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Georgi, Vincent Bernat schrieb: > Remove the fact that debian/rules is a sample. Also drop CFLAGS setting, > dpkg-buildpackage do it itself. Remove unused dh_* call (instead of just > commenting them out). Remove also some comments whose goals are just to > help you to write debian/rules. Yo

Re: RFS/ITP: linux-igd -- UPnP Internet Gateway Device

2008-03-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Nick, > The sources are at: > http://debian.leverton.org/dists/etch/main/source/linux-igd_1.0+cvs20070630-1.dsc > > The package is lintian clean. This builds and has been run-tested > against both libupnp2 and the new libupnp3. did you do anything special to build this package? # Add here c

Re: ITA/RFS: libupnp -- Intel Universal Plug And Play SDK and linux-igd -- UPnP Internet Gateway Device

2008-03-13 Thread Jochen Friedrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Nick, > libupnp (currently at libupnp2) was orphaned in #462833, but is still in > unstable and is used by: > > gmediaserver -- server for UPnP media players like Netgear MP101, Linksys > WMLS11B etc. > > http://debian.leverton.org/dists/etch/ma

Re: RFS: mediatomb - UPnP MediaServer

2007-09-05 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Andres, > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mediatomb > - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable > main contrib non-free > - dget > http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/m/mediatomb/mediatomb

Re: RFS: libsnmp-mib-compiler-perl (updated package)

2007-07-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Deepak, > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 0.06-1.2 > of my package "libsnmp-mib-compiler-perl". If you are the new maintainer, the version should be 0.06-2. Please also acknowledge the old NMU. Other comments: 1. the license states: "You may modify this module as you wish, bu

Re: RFS: libsnmp-multi-perl

2006-09-05 Thread Jochen Friedrich
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Arne, > The package can be found on mentors.debian.net: > - URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/l/libsnmp-multi-perl This looks a bit strange to me: Build-Depends-Indep: perl (>= ) Either specify a versioned dependency of remove the

Re: RFS: terralib -- A GIS classes and functions library.

2005-07-28 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Marco, you might have a look at the Debian GIS project at http://pkg-grass.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl. They maintain their own package repository and make sure all GIS classes and functions work together. Thanks, Jochen On Thu, 28 Jul 2005, Marco Tulio Gontijo e Silva wrote: > Hello,

Re: Temporary sponsor for cpufreqd

2005-01-02 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Mattia, > as my usual sponsor is on vacation I'm looking for a temporary sponsor > for my current cpufreqd package revision (1.2.2-2). Looks OK. Uploaded. Thanks, Jochen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Suggestions On Getting A Sponsor

2004-09-27 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Michael, > I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting > my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how > to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed > interested in uploading the package. I have been monitoring thi

Re: Suggestions On Getting A Sponsor

2004-09-27 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Michael, > I posted several messages to this list earlier this month about getting > my package sponsored. Lots of people gave me great suggestions on how > to improve the packing and other general ideas. However no one seemed > interested in uploading the package. I have been monitoring thi

Re: Dependency problem

2004-08-08 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, > My idea to solve the above problem has been to explicitly require at > least the same version of libgdal1 that python-gdal has. So I put > the following lines into debian/control: That's the wrong way to do it. Just think someone else is using your library (like qgis) and he will run

Re: Dependency problem

2004-08-08 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, > My idea to solve the above problem has been to explicitly require at > least the same version of libgdal1 that python-gdal has. So I put > the following lines into debian/control: That's the wrong way to do it. Just think someone else is using your library (like qgis) and he will run

Re: RFS: dcc -- Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

2004-04-09 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Martin, > * Package name: dcc > Version : 1.2.39 > Upstream Author : "Vernon Schryver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'll take a look at the package. Please look at #164842 and #199510 and retitle them as ITP. Close both of them in your changelog, as well :-) --jochen

Re: RFS: dcc -- Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse

2004-04-09 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Martin, > * Package name: dcc > Version : 1.2.39 > Upstream Author : "Vernon Schryver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I'll take a look at the package. Please look at #164842 and #199510 and retitle them as ITP. Close both of them in your changelog, as well :-) --jochen -- To UNSUBSC

Re: WNPP bugs are not closed with upload

2004-03-25 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Carlos, > > Consider one thing: the only one parsed changelog entry is LAST ONE. > > If you prepared dozen version on your box, and each of them closes some > > bugs, only last changelog will actually be closed. > > That's what I supposed when the bugs were not closed, but like you, I > don't r

Re: WNPP bugs are not closed with upload

2004-03-25 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Carlos, > > Consider one thing: the only one parsed changelog entry is LAST ONE. > > If you prepared dozen version on your box, and each of them closes some > > bugs, only last changelog will actually be closed. > > That's what I supposed when the bugs were not closed, but like you, I > don't r

Re: Packaging for Sid on the Debian machines?

2004-03-10 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Jörgen, > Question: how and where do I build for Sid? > Has '+chroots' anything to do with it? Just try "dchroot sid" on one of these machines :-) Hint: copy your package to /home/chroots/sid/home/ first. --jochen

Re: Packaging for Sid on the Debian machines?

2004-03-09 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Jörgen, > Question: how and where do I build for Sid? > Has '+chroots' anything to do with it? Just try "dchroot sid" on one of these machines :-) Hint: copy your package to /home/chroots/sid/home/ first. --jochen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

2004-03-07 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Bartosz, > > It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias > > to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'. > You can build it with `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k` > Or you can sign them after building with debsign utility. That's what i usually do, as well. I build everything

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

2004-03-07 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi > * Package name : xmms-blursk > Version : 1.3 Looks pretty good in general. However, a few nits to pick... - please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian policy requires this. - please add either "DH_COMPAT=4" to your rules or execute "echo 4 > debian/compat", c

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

2004-03-07 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Bartosz, > > It's confused by the UTF8 chars. All I could come up is adding an alias > > to debuild as 'debuild -kkey_id'. > You can build it with `dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot -k` > Or you can sign them after building with debsign utility. That's what i usually do, as well. I build everything

Re: RFS: xmms-blursk

2004-03-07 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi > * Package name : xmms-blursk > Version : 1.3 Looks pretty good in general. However, a few nits to pick... - please convert your files in the debian directory to UTF-8. The Debian policy requires this. - please add either "DH_COMPAT=4" to your rules or execute "echo 4 > debian/compat", c

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Sven, > I am searching to test for architecture in perl written pre/post inst > scripts. I am not perl fluetn though, and i don't know what is the > correct way of querying for architecture in those scripts. Sure i could > parse the uname output or something such, but maybe there is already a >

Re: how to test for architecture in perl base pre/postinst scripts ?

2004-02-23 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Sven, > I am searching to test for architecture in perl written pre/post inst > scripts. I am not perl fluetn though, and i don't know what is the > correct way of querying for architecture in those scripts. Sure i could > parse the uname output or something such, but maybe there is already a >

Re: Neue gdal version

2004-02-12 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, > I would prefer to do the second option but I am not sure whether > the tarball will be accepted then. Then i would go for this option. As long as you believe the new snapshot is more useful and has less bugs than the old one, there is no reason to keep the old one. --jochen

Re: Neue gdal version

2004-02-12 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, > I would prefer to do the second option but I am not sure whether > the tarball will be accepted then. Then i would go for this option. As long as you believe the new snapshot is more useful and has less bugs than the old one, there is no reason to keep the old one. --jochen -- To

Re: Buildds fail on quite a few architectures

2004-01-27 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Tobias, > Every failed buildd stopped with this message: > > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > xlibs-dev: Depends: libice-dev but it is not installable Quite a lot of packages are currently failing to build with this message. > My question is: do I have to do anyt

Re: Buildds fail on quite a few architectures

2004-01-27 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Tobias, > Every failed buildd stopped with this message: > > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies: > xlibs-dev: Depends: libice-dev but it is not installable Quite a lot of packages are currently failing to build with this message. > My question is: do I have to do anyt

Re: RFS: QGIS

2004-01-08 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Steve, > I'm looking for a sponsor for QGIS. QGIS is a geographic data viewer > capable of displaying shapefiles. It supports feature identification and > display of attribute tables. It also supports display of georeferenced > raster images and Digital Elevation Models. The web site for QGIS i

Re: RFS: QGIS

2004-01-08 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Steve, > I'm looking for a sponsor for QGIS. QGIS is a geographic data viewer > capable of displaying shapefiles. It supports feature identification and > display of attribute tables. It also supports display of georeferenced > raster images and Digital Elevation Models. The web site for QGIS i

Re: RFS: ike-scan

2003-12-29 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Benoit, > i just uploaded ike-scan 1.5.1 to mentors.debian.net and i'am looking for a > sponsor. > > The package is lintian and linda clean, here is the control file - you should provide the file downloaded from http://www.nta-monitor.com/ike-scan/ as ike-scan_1.5.1.orig.tar.gz. - you ship

Re: RFS: ike-scan

2003-12-29 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Benoit, > i just uploaded ike-scan 1.5.1 to mentors.debian.net and i'am looking for a > sponsor. > > The package is lintian and linda clean, here is the control file - you should provide the file downloaded from http://www.nta-monitor.com/ike-scan/ as ike-scan_1.5.1.orig.tar.gz. - you ship

Re: debian/tmp vs. debian/package

2003-11-19 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Martin, > I have a couple of packages and some use debian/tmp to build, others > debian/. I know of the -P debhelper option, but it says > that the default is debian/. However, my packages use > debian/tmp, and I don't know where to set/change that. Would someone > please tell me? man debhelpe

Re: debian/tmp vs. debian/package

2003-11-19 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Martin, > I have a couple of packages and some use debian/tmp to build, others > debian/. I know of the -P debhelper option, but it says > that the default is debian/. However, my packages use > debian/tmp, and I don't know where to set/change that. Would someone > please tell me? man debhelpe

Re: RFS: four xmms visualization plugins

2003-11-13 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi John, > http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-synaesthesia.tar.gz This one fails to build for me on Alpha... gcc -shared syna_xmms.lo syna_config.lo syna_core.lo -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm /usr/lib/libxmms.so /usr/lib/libgtk.so /usr/lib/libgdk.so /usr/lib/libgmodule.so /us

Re: RFS: four xmms visualization plugins

2003-11-13 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi John, > http://www.nixnuts.net/xmms-synaesthesia.tar.gz This one fails to build for me on Alpha... gcc -shared syna_xmms.lo syna_config.lo syna_core.lo -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -ldl -lXi -lXext -lX11 -lm /usr/lib/libxmms.so /usr/lib/libgtk.so /usr/lib/libgdk.so /usr/lib/libgmodule.so /us

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-27 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, > * package gdal 1.2 from CVS-snapshot > I (drawback: checking the *-orig.tar.gz is not so easy for a > sponsor, discussion with the DAM ... (see this thread)) It's OK with me then. If you fix the other problems (at least i would like to see the version output fixed, so it sho

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-27 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, > * package gdal 1.2 from CVS-snapshot > I (drawback: checking the *-orig.tar.gz is not so easy for a > sponsor, discussion with the DAM ... (see this thread)) It's OK with me then. If you fix the other problems (at least i would like to see the version output fixed, so it sho

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-25 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Andreas, > Yes and know. ;-) Usually you use last upstream stable but it is > basically the maintainer's call. Yes sure :-) I was only thinking on my duties as sponsor to check the *-orig.tar.gz. I can't do this in this case as upstream only provides the daily cvs snaphot on her site and dele

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-25 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Andreas, > Yes and know. ;-) Usually you use last upstream stable but it is > basically the maintainer's call. Yes sure :-) I was only thinking on my duties as sponsor to check the *-orig.tar.gz. I can't do this in this case as upstream only provides the daily cvs snaphot on her site and dele

Re: Looking for a sponsor

2003-10-25 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Bruno, > xmms-defx: A Sound alterator plug-in for xmms > > All files are avalaible in: > > http://www.igloo.cl/~bruno/xmms-defx/ sorry, fails to build for me (on Alpha): gcc -Llib -shared src/plugin.o -o lib/libdefx.so lib/libfx.a lib/libgui.a lib/libmain.a /usr/bin/ld: src/plugin.o: gp-relat

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-25 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Andreas, > Debian native or not usually should not be chosen on behalf of whether > upstream=debian-maintainer but on whether the package is Debian > specific (like dpkg or mime-support) or not.[1] > > * Debian versioning and upstream versioning is usually completely > unrelated. Yes, but th

Re: Looking for a sponsor

2003-10-25 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Bruno, > xmms-defx: A Sound alterator plug-in for xmms > > All files are avalaible in: > > http://www.igloo.cl/~bruno/xmms-defx/ sorry, fails to build for me (on Alpha): gcc -Llib -shared src/plugin.o -o lib/libdefx.so lib/libfx.a lib/libgui.a lib/libmain.a /usr/bin/ld: src/plugin.o: gp-relat

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-25 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Andreas, > Debian native or not usually should not be chosen on behalf of whether > upstream=debian-maintainer but on whether the package is Debian > specific (like dpkg or mime-support) or not.[1] > > * Debian versioning and upstream versioning is usually completely > unrelated. Yes, but th

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, some comments on your package: - please try to use the same email address in control and changelog. - please set DH_VERBOSE back to 0 when you're finished testing the package. - the copyrights file should probably mention a valid URL like cvs://cvs.remotesensing.org/cvsroot/ or ft

Re: RFS gdal

2003-10-24 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Hi Silke, some comments on your package: - please try to use the same email address in control and changelog. - please set DH_VERBOSE back to 0 when you're finished testing the package. - the copyrights file should probably mention a valid URL like cvs://cvs.remotesensing.org/cvsroot/ or ft