On 14 April 2011 14:27, Mats Erik Andersson
wrote:
> URL : http://becauserinter.net/bournal/
This should be http://becauseinter.net/bournal/
Regards
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listma
Hi Charles,
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 08:20:39PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Perhaps you can propose to the current maintainer to open his package to
> collaborative maintainance, by creating or joining a team, or simply accepting
> co-maintainers (you?) who commit themselves on a longer term tha
On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 09:57:53AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> You might want ping the maintainer directly and to report them as MIA
> if they do not respond:
He's been pinged on several occasions on #521722[1]. Ubuntu has
had new upstream version for nearly a year.
I'll ping him again directly and
y: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable main
contrib non-free
- dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/goocanvas/goocanvas_0.15-0.1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi Jakub,
Congratulations on becoming a DD!
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:05:14PM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> W: tesseract-eng source: debhelper-but-no-misc-depends tesseract-ocr-eng
> I: tesseract-eng source: debian-watch-file-is-missing
> I: tesseract-ocr-eng: copyright-with-old-dh-make-debian-copy
if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 09:47:36AM +0100, Michal Čihař wrote:
> Why you don't package latest upstream version? It's already several
> months old.
The latest version has unpackaged new dependencies and it would be
good to get at least 0.3 uploaded before starting work on 0.4.3.
> Also does Jeffrey
e uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
2009/8/1 Charles Plessy :
> This made me unsure that libavcodec-dev and libavformat-dev are necessary.
> Indeed,
> after removing them, the package could still be build in a cowbuilder.
You are right - well spotted - I have just tried building it with and
without those packages, and in either cas
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iulib".
* Package name: iulib
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/iulib/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : graphics
It builds these binary packages:
lib
I'm looking at fixing #517904[1], that the language packages for
tesseract are blobs without source. To do this, I will have to give a
new upstream tar.gz, containing the source, and not the blob. How do I
do this? Should I make up a new upstream version number? Is there a
standard solution for thi
Hi Charles,
2009/7/19 Charles Plessy :
> our tools do not invoke the build target twice in a row, but real people
> sometimes have a good reason to do. For instance, I tried to build iulib it
> did
> not work because I was missing dependancies, and when I installed them and
> called the build tar
2009/7/18 Charles Plessy :
> I found some issues in the latest version of your package:
>
> - The build target can not been invoked twice in a row because of the mv
> commands (you know what to do, you did it right for the clean target).
dh7 won't invoke the build target more than once, so I th
2009/7/14 Charles Plessy :
> I had a look at your package and wonder if the .la file should not be in
> libiulib-dev instead of libiulib0. Can you comment on this?
According to the libpkg-guide[1] you are absolutely right. I've fixed this.
> You patched the iulib to ‘libtoolize’ it in order to en
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iulib".
* Package name: iulib
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/iulib/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : graphics
It builds these binary packages:
lib
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iulib".
* Package name: iulib
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/iulib/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : graphics
It builds these binary packages:
lib
2009/6/27 Nick Leverton :
> First, you call dh_quilt_unpatch from your clean target, however this
> command is provided by quilt which is not part of build-essential.
> Pbuilder only auto-installs the dependencies after cleaning the package -
> but it will not do this as the clean fails. You might
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iulib".
* Package name: iulib
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/iulib/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : graphics
It builds these binary packages:
lib
2009/6/13 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. :
> The (unversioned, build-time use only) symlink libiulib.so ->
> libiulib.so.0.0.0 needs to be in libiulib-dev package. The (major-
> versioned) symlink libiulib.so.0 -> libiulib.so.0.0.0 needs to be in the
> libuilib0 package.
Thanks for this.
I have now uplo
2009/6/12 Paul Wise :
> Why is it a static library instead of a shared one?
Because that's how upstream set up the build process, and neither
upstream, nor I, knew enough about autoconf, automake and libtool to
make a shared library.
In the mean time, someone posted a working patch[1], and I have
2009/6/10 Salvatore Bonaccorso :
> I shortly looked into it, you seem to use a "unmodified" tiny
> debian/rule. You should minimize this, by using only a
> mini-debian/rule and depend in debian/control on (debhelper >= 7.0.8,
> please check the correct version in changelog of debhelper) - it will
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "iulib".
* Package name: iulib
Version : 0.3-1
Upstream Author : Thomas Breuel
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/iulib/
* License : Apache-2.0
Section : graphics
It builds these binary packages:
lib
URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iulib
- Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/i/iulib/iulib_0.3-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regard
Hi Sandro,
On Dec 8, 2008 10:47am, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's fine; it would be nice if you got back to me, since I already
have some knowledge on the package.
Thanks. First thing I've got to do is to package the new dependency iulib.
And I've uploaded to Debian :) Now it n
Hi Sandro,
2008/12/7 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> packages: the inter-dependencies. What you usually want it ocropus to
> depends on ocropus-data for the same version of the source package,
> hence you need this versioned depends "ocropus-data (>=
> ${source:Version})". This will ensure that
Hi Sandro,
2008/12/3 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> another thing about description: ocropus and ocropus-data have the
> same description: please clarify what's the purpose of -data package,
> just adding a simple paragraph at the bottom saying what the package
> contains.
Done.
>>> - please
Hi Sandro,
Apologies for the delay in making the changes.
Thanks for looking at the package.
2008/11/10 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - please remove "XS-DM-Upload-Allowed" field (that should be called
Done.
> - "Document" in short description should be uncapitalized: think at it
> like
2008/11/22 Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Did you find the time (or already planned to do so) to fix the points
> I mentioned?
I've got about half way through them. Real Life is just making me
short of time ATM. I'll get to the rest ASAP.
Regards
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
/o/ocropus
- - - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian
unstable main contrib non-free
- - - - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ocropus/ocropus_0.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
-BEGIN PGP
2008/9/22 Andreas Juch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not a mentor, but I tested your package because I wanted to use
> ocropus on my system. I think your dependencies are missing the lua
> interpreter - at least the verision I installed from m.d.n.
No - the ocroscript command implements a Lua interpr
/o/ocropus
- - - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - - dget
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ocropus/ocropus_0.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
-BEGIN PGP
/o/ocropus
- - Source repository: deb-src http://mentors.debian.net/debian unstable
main contrib non-free
- - dget http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/ocropus/ocropus_0.2-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE---
2008/8/22 Bas Wijnen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> --as-needed will let the linker throw away all symbols that aren't used.
> It always does this when linking static libraries. That's why with
> those, it's important that they're in the right order. The same is true
> when using --as-needed. The order
2008/8/22 Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The filename is only required for manpage files that are *not* listed
> in 'debian/nameofpackage.manpages'.
Thanks for the explanation.
Regards
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
2008/8/21 Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You simply don't install debian/ocroscript.1. Read dh_installman(1) and
> install it by a ocropus.manpages debhelper file or by adding it to the
> dh_installman call in debian/rules.
Absolutely right:
dh_installman debian/ocroscript.1
did the trick
It is probably because I'm trying to hack past midnight, but I can't
get dh_installman to install my manpage properly, meaning that lintian
report binary-without-manpage.
If someone could tell me what I am doing wrong, I'd be grateful.
The respective dsc file can be found at:
http://mentors.debia
2008/7/22 Andreas Schildbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 1) Is is actually needed to do the packaging work on a Debian system, or
> would a derivative like Ubuntu also do? I would always test my package
> on a "real" Debian before putting it up for sponsoring or uploading, but
> having to do actual deve
2008/6/26 Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol syx_interp_enter_context used by
>> debian/syx-gtk/usr/lib/syx/gtk/libsyx-gtk.so.0.0.0 found in none of
>> the libraries.
This presumably means that you have forgotten to link one of the
libraries. See the man page for dp
2008/6/25 Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I uploaded the -1 version again and removed the further changelog entries.
It builds now, but you have some warnings to fix:
dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: symbol syx_interp_enter_context used by
debian/syx-gtk/usr/lib/syx/gtk/libsyx-gtk.so.0.0.0 found in non
2008/6/25 Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> rm -rf doc/reference/{html,latex,rtf,xml}
>> mkdir doc/reference/html
>> mkdir: cannot create directory `doc/reference/html': File exists
>> make: *** [clean] Error 1
>>
>
> How is it possible? The doc/reference/html is deleted just before doing
> mkdir
2008/6/21 Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "syx".
>
> * Package name: syx
> Version : 0.1.7-1
> Upstream Author : Luca Bruno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://syx.googlecode.com
> * License : MIT license
> Section
2008/6/12 Raphael Geissert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> did you update your chroot? gcc in sid is 4.3, in lenny is 4.2.
Duh... I assumed that gcc-4.3 had been in sid for more than the week
since I last updated my chroot. Thanks.
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
2008/6/8 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It might be interesting to use a debug build, and share the backtraces,
> so that one can check whether that's the same bug, when the segfault
> happens.
Below is the backtrace from tesseract built with gcc-4.2 and
--as-needed. Repeating it without -
2008/4/29 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You could try and use LDFLAGS to pass -Wl,--as-needed (linker flags).
> But since it could break silently some parts of your build, it shouldn't
> be used without -Wl,-z,defs which will help spot possible missing -l$foo
> options in intermediate
2008/4/29 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> You could try and use LDFLAGS to pass -Wl,--as-needed (linker flags).
> But since it could break silently some parts of your build, it shouldn't
> be used without -Wl,-z,defs which will help spot possible missing -l$foo
> options in intermediate
2008/4/29 Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > and I even tried manually adding libc too, all without luck.
>
> DON'T DO THAT.
>
> There are libc6, libc6.1, libc0.1, and libc0.3 around. You don't want to
> hardcode it. Ever.
I figured as much, but wanted to see what I could do to change th
I'm preparing a package for the new version of tesseract and I have a
small problem:
[...]
dh_gencontrol
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
dpkg-gencontrol: warning: unknown substitution variable ${shlibs:Depends}
dh_md5sums
dh_builddeb
dpkg-deb: building pac
On 20/12/2007, Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks better now :) uploaded.
Thanks!
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 19/12/2007, Ricardo Mones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've started to check the package last week, it was built ok under
> pbuilder, but I was unable to install it because of broken dependencies and
> had no time to look further. Do you know if this still happens? I'm somewhat
> reluctant to
ld be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ld be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
#363506: podbrowser: new upstream available
#363508: podbrowser: new upstream available
are nearly 2 years old, the latest version has been out for a year,
and the maintainer, Florian Ragwitz, isn't answering email. Can anyone
confirm whether he is MIA or not?
Regards,
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On 20/10/2007, Jeffrey Ratcliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It builds these binary packages:
> tesseract-ocr - The well-known OCR engine first developed by HP and now
> taken over by Google
> tesseract-ocr-data - Command line OCR tool data
> tesseract-ocr-dev - Deve
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.01-1 of "tesseract",
plus the eight language packages, "tesseract-eng", "tesseract-deu",
"tesseract-deu-f", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa",
"tesseract-por", "tesseract-ita", "tesseract-fra"
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.01-1 of "tesseract",
plus the eight language packages, "tesseract-eng", "tesseract-deu",
"tesseract-deu-f", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa",
"tesseract-por", "tesseract-ita", "tesseract-fra"
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.01-1
of "tesseract", plus the eight language packages, "tesseract-eng",
"tesseract-deu", "tesseract-deu-f", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa",
"tesseract-por", "tesseract-ita", "tesseract-fra"
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract
On 26/09/2007, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and I more or less used the v1 diff as a template and just made mods
> > to get it lintian clean. I see your point, though. I assume it is
> > possible simultaneously to make the -ocr and -ocr-dev packages, just
> > defining which files g
On 04/10/2007, Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you will see, that the autotools files (install-sh, ...) are links to
> tools of automake version 1.9. And they are probably dead links, because
> you miss the automake 1.9 package. But that's just a guess.
Absolutely right. And it now bui
I've been trying to build multiple packages from one source using the
example given in
http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2007/04/msg00347.html and
http://www.miriamruiz.es/weblog/?p=42
as an example. debuild seems to fall over with
configure: error: cannot find install-sh or install.sh in "
On 25/09/2007, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why are the include files packages in /usr/include/tesseract? Sounds
> like that should rather go into a tesseract-ocr-dev package. Or is it
> really needed to run tesseract?
I must admit that I am fairly inexperienced at packaging, and I
On 25/09/2007, Christoph Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I may have missed something so bear with me. Currently there are two
> packages in "unstable":
>
> tesseract-ocr - Command line OCR tool
> tesseract-ocr-data - Command line OCR tool data
>
> >From #434152 I
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.01-1
of "tesseract", plus the eight language packages, "tesseract-eng",
"tesseract-deu", "tesseract-deu-f", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa",
"tesseract-por", "tesseract-ita", "tesseract-fra"
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.01-1
of "tesseract", plus the eight language packages, "tesseract-eng",
"tesseract-deu", "tesseract-deu-f", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa",
"tesseract-por", "tesseract-ita", "tesseract-fra"
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract
On 06/09/07, DS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. There is no second revision. Are you sure that you uploaded it?
It was requested that I put all changes from -2 in -1, as -1 was never released.
The package can be found on mentors.debian.net:
- URL: http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/t/tess
On 31/08/07, Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then why not close the bug in the changelog?
I thought I had. I managed to pick the number from the wrong bug
tracker in the changelog but the correct one elsewhere. Stupid. Fixed.
> Did you run lintian against the .changes file? I downloaded
/pool/main/t/tesseract/tesseract_2.01-1.dsc
I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Kind regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
> > Have you agreed with John Goerzen that you take over maintenance of
> > this package? http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gscan2pdf.html
John has been in contact with me in the meantime, so I hope I won't
need a sponsor!
Regards
Jeff
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
On 30/08/2007, Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you agreed with John Goerzen that you take over maintenance of this
> package?
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gscan2pdf.html
He hasn't replied to my emails, which I thought was strange, but as I
am upstream...
Regards
Jeff
--
To
nd regards
Jeffrey Ratcliffe
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.00-1
of "tesseract-ocr", plus the six language packages, "tesseract-eng",
"tesseract-deu", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa", "tesseract-ita",
"tesseract-fra"
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract - The well-known OCR engine first
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.00-1
of "tesseract-ocr", plus the six language packages, "tesseract-eng",
"tesseract-deu", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa", "tesseract-ita",
"tesseract-fra"
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract - The well-known OCR engine first
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 2.00-1
of "tesseract-ocr", plus the six language packages, "tesseract-eng",
"tesseract-deu", "tesseract-nld", "tesseract-spa", "tesseract-ita",
"tesseract-fra"
It builds these binary packages:
tesseract - The well-known OCR engine first
73 matches
Mail list logo
