Bug#902634: RFS: flashplugin-nonfree/1:3.7+nmu1 [NMU] [RC] -- Adobe Flash Player - browser plugin

o-check-certificate with wget * Add Recommends: libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37-gtk2. (Closes: #862144) * Remove remaining calls to gpg and the dependency on gnupg. (Closes: #885119) -- James Lu Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:27:56 -0700 Best, James diff -Nru flashplugin-nonfree-3.7/debian/changelog

Bug#885562: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.2-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings". This package is already in the Debian archive, but my last sponsor (Christian Kastner) has been inactive for some months and has since suggested that I open a new

Bug#864056: RFS: icoutils/0.31.2-1.1 [NMU]

rence/pkgs.html#nmu-guidelines Regards, James Lu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#834539: RFS: zuki-themes/3.20-1-1 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "zuki-themes" * Package name: zuki-themes * Version : 3.20-1-1 * Upstream Author : Mattias * URL : https://github.com/lassekongo83/zuki-themes * License : GPL

Bug#790104: Fwd: Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 (This was supposed to go to the maintainers for lightdm-gtk-greeter in Debian, not the upstream list; sorry for the noise.) Hi everyone, Recently I've been trying to get lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings into Debian, since it's a nifty utility! Right

Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 11/10/2015 2:37 AM, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2015-10-11 07:54, James Lu wrote: >>> d/copyright: >>> - The license appears to be GPL-3, not GPL-3+ (at least in the handful >>>of files I checked). This a

Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi everyone, (Hoping this is the right list for this) Recently I've been trying to get lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings into Debian, since it's a nifty utility! Right now, my packaging work has an RFS (request for sponsorship) bug at https://bugs.deb

Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Christian, Thanks for the thorough review! On Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:47:21 +0200 Christian Kastner wrote: > d/control: > - The frontend for git at anonscm.d.o has been changed from gitweb to >git; please update Vcs-Browser URL accordingly >

Bug#790104: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Patrick, I'm not the developer of lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings; I'm just interested in maintaining it in Debian. Mentors.debian.net is a place where you can upload packages and find a sponsor to get them uploaded into Debian, but so far there h

Bug#797636: RFS: variety/0.5.4-1 [ITP]

d a debian/watch file for Launchpad. - control: add Homepage field. - control: remove duplicate python-lxml dependency. - Add myself to debian/copyright. - rules: add get-orig-source target. Regards, James Lu signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#790104: RFS: lightdm-gtk-greeter-settings/1.2.0-1 [ITP]

t, so that successive builds work. Regards, James Lu -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVji2rAAoJEC7D9g3nHAudJNQP/0JxcBJ2ZB2rnGNE/O5RYf/J VhLVyu2V1RjOrCaMdNntha5dYR/gLM7zocD6w4227GpKQmZzPrrZtPEWvPZgj5Bp kSLztlsBoSds0t9NE/T2S5ol/3IcTowVSkacWWL0ohV0fFc/YjaSan83tb

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

Hi Vincent, All right, thanks for the help too! Best, James On 16/06/2015 12:46 AM, Vincent Cheng wrote: On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:09 AM, James Lu wrote: Hi Vincent, Oops, I probably uploaded the wrong version. The get-orig-source target uses the date of the last debian/changelog entry to

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

ncent Cheng wrote: Hi James, On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 4:55 PM, James Lu wrote: Hi Vincent, Wow, that's a lot of magic for one makefile target! I followed the guide, setting the file timestamps to the last changelog entry's date, and it works fine now. I've uploaded the newest versio

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

s, On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:51 PM, James Lu wrote: Hi Vincent, I've removed bzr from the build dependencies. After fiddling with the get-orig-source a bit, I realized that I can't get the same checksum either when running it multiple times. According to a 'diff' of &#x

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

pears to be a wishlist bug filed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bzr/+bug/245170 Best, James On 07/06/15 11:17 PM, Vincent Cheng wrote: Hi James, (Sorry for the late reply!) On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:28 AM, James Lu wrote: Hello Vincent, Okay, I've uploaded a newer version of the packa

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

owner -1 ! On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 9:04 AM, James Lu wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtk3-engines-unico". This upload fixes an RC bug that caused GTK3 applications to crash with any theme that uses the

Bug#784854: MIA for "Karolina Kalic "

Hello MIA Team, After some discussion on bug #784854 , I'm trying to find information about maintainer "Karolina Kalic ", whose package "gtk3-engines-unico" was apparently orphaned incorrectly without the MIA team's consent. A critica

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

cent Cheng wrote: Control: tag -1 + moreinfo Hi James, On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 11:52 AM, James Lu wrote: Hi, Okay. Forget what I said about quilt, I don't think it'd fix this particular issue either. Right now, the problem is in the original source (aka the .orig.tar). The INSTALL fi

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

enough to make Lintian complain*. Adding a debian/clean file only removes the INSTALL file from the extracted tree, but not the .orig.tar.gz. I could add a Lintian override if this is appropriate. James On 09/05/2015 10:24 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: On Sat, 9 May 2015 19:19:22 James Lu wrote:

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

patch to replace the symlink with a copy of the regular file, but that didn't work. I don't know what the regular practice is for situations like this. Regards, James On 09/05/2015 6:40 PM, Dmitry Smirnov wrote: On Sat, 9 May 2015 09:04:39 James Lu wrote: One small note: the tarball

Bug#784854: RFS: gtk3-engines-unico/1.0.3+14.04.20140109+repack1-1 [ITA] [RC]

symlink in the root folder, fixing Lintian error unsafe-symlink-in-source. * Update Standards Version to 3.9.6. -- James Lu Fri, 08 May 2015 17:40:58 -0700 One small note: the tarball was repacked in order to remove the INSTALL symlink, which quilt didn't seem to handle properly (it j

Bug#783277: RFS: gnome-exe-thumbnailer/0.9.3 [ITP]

in the Wine team, I didn't find any place where I could create a new repo. The packaging source is on GitHub <https://github.com/GLolol/gnome-exe-thumbnailer> for now. Best, James On 27/04/15 01:50 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote: Hi James, On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 11:52:13 -0700, James Lu

Bug#783277: Source for Wine exe-thumbnailer

Hi there, Recently, I've decided to package gnome-exe-thumbnailer/exe-thumbnailer in Debian (relevant bug# ). I just want to know, Is there an upstream repo for the exe-thumbnailer source? The version in Ubuntu / Launchpad, which I pul

Bug#783277: RFS: gnome-exe-thumbnailer/0.9.3 [ITP]

care to join us... I'm not too familiar with packaging teams, but that sounds good to me! I'm open to collaborative maintenance. :) Best, James On 26/04/2015 10:16 PM, Stephen Kitt wrote: Control: owner 783277 ! Hi James, On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 17:52:29 -0700, James Lu wrote:

Bug#783277: RFS: gnome-exe-thumbnailer/0.9.3 [ITP]

o optional from extra. - Include my changes in debian/copyright. - Remove /usr/share/gconf/schemas from dirs file. - Explicitly set source/format to 3.0 native. This is what the Ubuntu packaging seems to suggest, as there is only one .tar.gz file available for download. -