t-line:
deb http://bozu.sytes.net/~tyuyu/estraier/ ./
deb-src http://bozu.sytes.net/~tyuyu/estraier/ ./
I'm now in NM process.
regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpRrZgZcwNWB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t-line:
deb http://bozu.sytes.net/~tyuyu/estraier/ ./
deb-src http://bozu.sytes.net/~tyuyu/estraier/ ./
I'm now in NM process.
regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp1DWO2YocHl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
x27;able in few weeks. Great!
regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgprks1bWavsj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
x27;able in few weeks. Great!
regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
azehakase debian/
regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpEbrtJvNBvz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
azehakase debian/
regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
There is the package of zphoto in [2]Debian JP.
1. http://www.namazu.org/~satoru/zphoto/index.html.en
2. http://packages.debian.or.jp/unstable-jp/graphics/zphoto.html.en
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgpewxi7le31K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
's ming module will necessitate splitting source packages, of
> course, but that would solve (from memory) most of the reported problems.
Thank you for information. I'll check the ming module in PHP and if
it is better than that of libming, I'll omit php4-ming package.
regard
There is the package of zphoto in [2]Debian JP.
1. http://www.namazu.org/~satoru/zphoto/index.html.en
2. http://packages.debian.or.jp/unstable-jp/graphics/zphoto.html.en
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
's ming module will necessitate splitting source packages, of
> course, but that would solve (from memory) most of the reported problems.
Thank you for information. I'll check the ming module in PHP and if
it is better than that of libming, I'll omit php4-ming package.
r
Hello,
I intend to adopt libming etc. But [1]they are already removed.
Does anyone tell me whether I should reopen and re-title the old wnpp
bug #166973, or submit new ITP?
1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=166973
regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
I intend to adopt libming etc. But [1]they are already removed.
Does anyone tell me whether I should reopen and re-title the old wnpp
bug #166973, or submit new ITP?
1. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=166973
regards,
--
Hidetaka Iwai
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
12 matches
Mail list logo