i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pgpdump (0.19-1) package.
pgpdump is a pgp packet visualizer, which is similar (but better) to
gpg's --list-packets command. sample output (dump of pgpdump's signed
.dsc file):
Old: Signature Packet(tag 2)(277 bytes)
Ver 3 - old
Hash material(5
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pyx (0.3.1-1) package.
pyx is a python module for generating encapsulated postscript graphics
out of python primitives that abstract postscript and tex/latex. pyx is
commonly used for create 2 and 3d plots for papers. for example, the
following python code produces
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pgpdump (0.19-1) package.
pgpdump is a pgp packet visualizer, which is similar (but better) to
gpg's --list-packets command. sample output (dump of pgpdump's signed
.dsc file):
Old: Signature Packet(tag 2)(277 bytes)
Ver 3 - old
Hash material(5
i am seeking a sponsor for my [1]pyx (0.3.1-1) package.
pyx is a python module for generating encapsulated postscript graphics
out of python primitives that abstract postscript and tex/latex. pyx is
commonly used for create 2 and 3d plots for papers. for example, the
following python code produces
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:56:48AM -0500, Ed Strauch wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the SystemC package. I have a package
> that has been tested and would like to have someone to look at it.
please tell us something about this package.
> This package is built for the 'testing' distributio
On Mon, Jul 07, 2003 at 04:56:48AM -0500, Ed Strauch wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for the SystemC package. I have a package
> that has been tested and would like to have someone to look at it.
please tell us something about this package.
> This package is built for the 'testing' distributio
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:55:21AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
> >discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
> >all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
> >proposal, or did I miss something?
[...]
> Also: What are
On Mon, Jun 30, 2003 at 11:55:21AM +, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Matt Kraai ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote*:
> >discusses merging the sponsorship program and the WNPP. I believe
> >all of the objections were addressed. May I implement the
> >proposal, or did I miss something?
[...]
> Also: What are
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:40:23AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Graham Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:44:34PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> >> Package: pyx
> >
> > the subject should be:
> >
> > Subject: RFS: pyx -- Pyt
On Fri, Jun 27, 2003 at 01:40:23AM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Graham Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:44:34PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> >> Package: pyx
> >
> > the subject should be:
> >
> > Subject: RFS: pyx -- Pyt
Package: pgpdump
Version: 0.19-1
Homepage: http://pgp.iijlab.net/pgpdump.html
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: PGP packet visualizer
pgpdump is a PGP packet visualizer that displays the sequence of OpenPGP
or PGP version 2 packets from a file.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:44:34PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> Package: pyx
the subject should be:
Subject: RFS: pyx -- Python module for generating PostScript graphics
thats what i get for using mutt.
--
gram
pgpPNFNQOhsI7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: pyx
Version: 0.3.1-1
Homepage: http://pyx.sf.net/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: Python module for generating PostScript graphics
PyX is a Python package for the creation of encapsulated PostScript
figures. It provides both an abstr
Package: pgpdump
Version: 0.19-1
Homepage: http://pgp.iijlab.net/pgpdump.html
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: PGP packet visualizer
pgpdump is a PGP packet visualizer that displays the sequence of OpenPGP
or PGP version 2 packets from a file.
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 06:44:34PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> Package: pyx
the subject should be:
Subject: RFS: pyx -- Python module for generating PostScript graphics
thats what i get for using mutt.
--
gram
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: pyx
Version: 0.3.1-1
Homepage: http://pyx.sf.net/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: Python module for generating PostScript graphics
PyX is a Python package for the creation of encapsulated PostScript
figures. It provides both an abstr
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 02:48:08PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> Package: tdl
oops. the sujbect should be
Subject: RFS: tdl -- todo list manager
--
gram
pgp2p0D5n9MUk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Package: tdl
Version: 1.4-1
Homepage: http://www.rrbcurnow.freeuk.com/tdl/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: todo list manager
tdl is a program for managing a 'to-do' list of pending jobs that you
have.
.
Besides basic features like adding ne
Package: colordiff
Version: 1.0.2-1
Homepage: http://colordiff.sf.net/
Deb: http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/unstable/
NM-Status: waiting on DAM
Description: tool to colorize 'diff' output
ColorDiff is a wrapper for for the 'diff' command. It produces
the same output as diff, but with colored hig
i am looking for a sponsor for themus. the package is (fairly) linda and
lintian clean. it is available from my private apt repository [1].
here is an excerpt from the control file:
Source: themus
Maintainer: Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Section: gnome
Priority: optional
Architectur
On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 12:05:27AM +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Graham Wilson
> > Priority: important
>
> Is it? Really?
thats what it was when i adopted it. i havent changed it. and since
man-db depends on it, according to policy, bsdmainutils has to be at
i am looking a sponsor bsdmainutils. the package is (mostly) linda and
lintian clean. it is avaiable from my private apt repository [1].
here is an excerpt from the control file:
Package: bsdmainutils
Version: 5.20030320-1
Section: utils
Priority: important
Architecture: i386
Depends: libc6 (>= 2
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 04:37:47PM -0500, Morgon Kanter wrote:
> Hello,
hello.
> I'm unsure exactly what to do next, however, because it is unclear. Am
> I supposed to file an ITP bug against WNPP? Or should I find a sponsor
> first?
either one. i dont think it matters too much.
> (it seems tha
On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 04:37:47PM -0500, Morgon Kanter wrote:
> Hello,
hello.
> I'm unsure exactly what to do next, however, because it is unclear. Am
> I supposed to file an ITP bug against WNPP? Or should I find a sponsor
> first?
either one. i dont think it matters too much.
> (it seems tha
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:04:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Are the files purely written by Apache or are they configuration
> > files? If the latter, then I think they should reside in /etc.
> > Otherwise I think /var/lib is the
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a
> *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2
> support is gone for the panel and applets in unstable, should I just
> stop uploadin
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 11:04:15PM +, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 12:07:12AM +0200, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> > Are the files purely written by Apache or are they configuration
> > files? If the latter, then I think they should reside in /etc.
> > Otherwise I think /var/lib is the
On Sat, Mar 15, 2003 at 06:48:55PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> SECOND (#184431): what's the best practice with packages that have a
> *-gnome (1.2) version that requires applet support? Now that gnome 1.2
> support is gone for the panel and applets in unstable, should I just
> stop uploadin
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > Comments?
[...]
> Anyone else have anything to say? Should I cc -policy and let them
> debate it?
shou
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 11:16:18AM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > > > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > > > For Sponsorship?
> > > > Comments?
[...]
> Anyone else have anything to say? Should I cc -policy and let them
> debate it?
shou
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > For Sponsorship?
> > Comments?
>
> AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also
> include ITA
in this case, the ITA
On Fri, Mar 07, 2003 at 10:03:14PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> Joe Nahmias wrote:
> > What if we add a new type to the wnpp package 'RFS' = Ready/Request
> > For Sponsorship?
> > Comments?
>
> AFAIK, the set of RFS is not a subset of previous ITP. They also
> include ITA
in this case, the ITA
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:01:36PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:16:11 -0600, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> >dpkg -l PACKAGE | awk '$2 ~ /PACKAGE/ { print $3 }'
>
> Well, I just said that I consider foo to be bad overkill, and yo
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 05:01:36PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2003 07:16:11 -0600, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
> >dpkg -l PACKAGE | awk '$2 ~ /PACKAGE/ { print $3 }'
>
> Well, I just said that I consider foo to be bad overkill, and yo
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:41:58PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Parsing /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE/changelog.gz is out of the question
> since /usr/share/doc need not be present, and calling dpkg --list
> $PACKAGE and parsing its output looks like bad overkill.
dpkg -l PACKAGE | awk '$2 ~ /PACKAGE/ { p
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:41:58PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> Parsing /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE/changelog.gz is out of the question
> since /usr/share/doc need not be present, and calling dpkg --list
> $PACKAGE and parsing its output looks like bad overkill.
dpkg -l PACKAGE | awk '$2 ~ /PACKAGE/ { p
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:50:39PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAIK, non-free only needs permission to redistribute.
>
> Yes. For examples of disqualified-from-non-free software look at the
> various installers. Newer Sun JDKs also haven't made
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:50:39PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > AFAIK, non-free only needs permission to redistribute.
>
> Yes. For examples of disqualified-from-non-free software look at the
> various installers. Newer Sun JDKs also haven't made
[cc'ing colin so that maybe he will add something to his page about
dchroot.]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:31:57AM -0800, Brett Cundal wrote:
> > Is there some other way to handle this automatically?
>
> Yeah: get a decent chroot ;)
>
[cc'ing colin so that maybe he will add something to his page about
dchroot.]
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 06:19:46PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:31:57AM -0800, Brett Cundal wrote:
> > Is there some other way to handle this automatically?
>
> Yeah: get a decent chroot ;)
>
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:28:32AM +0100, Till Gerken wrote:
> These are the options Sean Perry (my sponsor) and I have come up with:
>
> - remove xmms from the dependency list and move it to suggests (which
> is not handled by apt)
i think this would be the best option.
--
gram
pgp7iDeOBvGLq
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 09:28:32AM +0100, Till Gerken wrote:
> These are the options Sean Perry (my sponsor) and I have come up with:
>
> - remove xmms from the dependency list and move it to suggests (which
> is not handled by apt)
i think this would be the best option.
--
gram
pgp0.pgp
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 04:24:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlibs.shlibs:
>
> ibICE 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libSM 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libX11 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXext 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXft 1 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXi 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
On Sun, Feb 16, 2003 at 04:24:39PM +0100, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/xlibs.shlibs:
>
> ibICE 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libSM 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libX11 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXext 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXft 1 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> libXi 6 xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:43:10AM +0100, Henning Moll wrote:
> Hi!
hello.
> I just build my first binary package. May anybody have a look over it?
> Lintian (woody) reports no errors/warnings, but i think it's still not
> perfect ;-)
could you tell us some more about it first? also, the proper
On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 01:43:10AM +0100, Henning Moll wrote:
> Hi!
hello.
> I just build my first binary package. May anybody have a look over it?
> Lintian (woody) reports no errors/warnings, but i think it's still not
> perfect ;-)
could you tell us some more about it first? also, the proper
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:37:28PM -0500, David Grant wrote:
> Hi,
hello.
> I'm getting this Lintain error for my package called "gav":
>
> E: gav: changelog-file-not-compressed CHANGELOG
>
> CHANGELOG is the upstream changelog for the source package and it is in
> the package source root dire
On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 10:37:28PM -0500, David Grant wrote:
> Hi,
hello.
> I'm getting this Lintain error for my package called "gav":
>
> E: gav: changelog-file-not-compressed CHANGELOG
>
> CHANGELOG is the upstream changelog for the source package and it is in
> the package source root dire
please dont resend your message twice.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:04:22PM +0100, Andrea Bedini wrote:
> my package (catdvi) is out of date on mips, I've checked buildd logs
> but I saw that the last version builded on mips was 0.13-1 and after
> that no mips build was attempted (or logged).
it s
please dont resend your message twice.
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 01:04:22PM +0100, Andrea Bedini wrote:
> my package (catdvi) is out of date on mips, I've checked buildd logs
> but I saw that the last version builded on mips was 0.13-1 and after
> that no mips build was attempted (or logged).
it s
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:51:04AM -0800, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> I appreciate the response. However, it brings up two questions. I
> went through the list of packages last night. A. How do I determine
> if anyone even gives a rip about the package any longer? ( I noticed
> many of the bug rep
On Fri, Jan 24, 2003 at 08:51:04AM -0800, deFreese, Barry wrote:
> I appreciate the response. However, it brings up two questions. I
> went through the list of packages last night. A. How do I determine
> if anyone even gives a rip about the package any longer? ( I noticed
> many of the bug rep
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Samuel Desseaux wrote:
> *FTP-Master: where could i find more informations about that? It seems
> interessant but not very clear.
you cant just sign up to be an ftp-master. i dont really know, but id
have to guess that you could become one after having wor
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 10:29:17AM +0100, Samuel Desseaux wrote:
> *FTP-Master: where could i find more informations about that? It seems
> interessant but not very clear.
you cant just sign up to be an ftp-master. i dont really know, but id
have to guess that you could become one after having wor
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts |
> > ttf-larabie-deco
>
> That is indeed the same thing. This means my original requirement is not
> entirely what I want either. What I mean is "ttf-freefont is suf
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:21:36PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> > Depends: ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-straight, ttf-freefonts | ttf-larabie-deco
>
> That is indeed the same thing. This means my original requirement is not
> entirely what I want either. What I mean is "ttf-freefont is sufficie
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> This means that either :
> a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.
> b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
> contrib, but with dependencies on ttf-larabie-straight and
> ttf-la
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 09:25:50PM +0100, Frank Gevaerts wrote:
> This means that either :
> a foobillard goes to non-free, which would be a pity.
> b The fonts are removed from the package, which gets foobillard to
> contrib, but with dependencies on ttf-larabie-straight and
> ttf-la
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:20:49PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install
> them manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure
> suitable to be an apt source (anyone care to enlighten me?).
i like to use mini-dinstall for doing
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:20:49PM -0500, Joe Nahmias wrote:
> You will have to download debs from the URL posted and then install
> them manually, since I don't know how to set up a file structure
> suitable to be an apt source (anyone care to enlighten me?).
i like to use mini-dinstall for doing
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:12:31AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> > is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> > then running "compi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 10:12:31AM +, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> > One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> > is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> > then running "compi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Howdy,
hello.
> One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> then running "compileall.py" in the postinst. Would someone comment on
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 08:17:28PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Howdy,
hello.
> One thing I noticed in the packages (that isn't covered in the policy)
> is the practice of deleting the ".pyc" files in debian/rules, and
> then running "compileall.py" in the postinst. Would someone comment on
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:23:37AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> I would be happy to sponsor kernel-patch-ck. I have taken a look at
> it and it is well done. Is there anything you want to update before I
> upload it?
no. thanks for taking the time.
--
gram
pgpJ343CWczTT.pgp
Description: PGP s
On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 08:23:37AM -0800, David Kimdon wrote:
> I would be happy to sponsor kernel-patch-ck. I have taken a look at
> it and it is well done. Is there anything you want to update before I
> upload it?
no. thanks for taking the time.
--
gram
msg07624/pgp0.pgp
Description:
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:40:11PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> i am looking for a sponsor for kernel-patch-ck, which is Con Kolivas'
> [1] patch for the linux kernel to improve responsiveness.
>
> packages are available at:
>
> http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/
>
&g
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 11:40:11PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> i am looking for a sponsor for kernel-patch-ck, which is Con Kolivas'
> [1] patch for the linux kernel to improve responsiveness.
>
> packages are available at:
>
> http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/
>
&g
i am looking for a sponsor for kernel-patch-ck, which is Con Kolivas'
[1] patch for the linux kernel to improve responsiveness.
packages are available at:
http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/
which apt-getable.
[1] http://kernel.kolivas.net/
--
gram
pgp1enVOntwdG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
i am looking for a sponsor for kernel-patch-ck, which is Con Kolivas'
[1] patch for the linux kernel to improve responsiveness.
packages are available at:
http://decoy.wox.org/~bob/debian/
which apt-getable.
[1] http://kernel.kolivas.net/
--
gram
msg07537/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP sign
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:09:12PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
hello.
> There's 3 more library packages that aren't found by dpkg-shlibdeps. Am
are the extra libraries explicitly used by your program?
--
gram
pgpH4rsoZZmFX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:09:12PM -0400, Stephen Gran wrote:
> Hello all,
hello.
> There's 3 more library packages that aren't found by dpkg-shlibdeps. Am
are the extra libraries explicitly used by your program?
--
gram
msg07392/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:19:18AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> On 3.10.2002 1:26 Uhr, "Graham Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what, if any, local changes have you made to the source? could you
> > provide a diff between the debian version and your version
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 08:19:18AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> On 3.10.2002 1:26 Uhr, "Graham Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > what, if any, local changes have you made to the source? could you
> > provide a diff between the debian version and your version
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:15:39AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> On 2.10.2002 5:18 Uhr, "Graham Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > do you mean where you want the package to install to (as opposed to
> > build directory)? if that is the case, use the --root and -
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 08:15:39AM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> On 2.10.2002 5:18 Uhr, "Graham Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > do you mean where you want the package to install to (as opposed to
> > build directory)? if that is the case, use the --root and -
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> At the moment we are experimenting only with the Apache package and
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot etc.
>
> Do you by any chance know where I can specify in the 'rules' file
> where I would like the root directory to be?
do you mean w
On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 01:42:43PM +0200, Zeno Davatz wrote:
> At the moment we are experimenting only with the Apache package and
> dpkg-buildpackage -rfakeroot etc.
>
> Do you by any chance know where I can specify in the 'rules' file
> where I would like the root directory to be?
do you mean
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 09:10:21AM +0200, Carlo Contavalli wrote:
>I was seeking for some opinions... I'm working now on a
> package that relies on a script that may be modified by the system
> administrator, and I'm wondering about:
>
> - how to manage upgrades (overwrites & co.)
> - whe
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 09:10:21AM +0200, Carlo Contavalli wrote:
>I was seeking for some opinions... I'm working now on a
> package that relies on a script that may be modified by the system
> administrator, and I'm wondering about:
>
> - how to manage upgrades (overwrites & co.)
> - wh
80 matches
Mail list logo
