On 01/06/14 04:24, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> Some comments below.
>
> More:
>
> Some bits of airoscript-ng use /usr/local unconditionally.
>
As commented on my previous reply, the package don't installs airoscript-ng.
> GCC warnings:
>
> tkiptun-
On 01/06/14 04:39, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 10:24 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>>
>>> Some comments below.
>>
>> More:
>
> One more - the ieee-data package places the oui files in a different
> location to where aircrack-ng looks for the
On 01/06/14 03:47, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> dget -x
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/aircrack-ng/aircrack-ng_1.2-0~beta3-1.dsc
>
> Some comments below. Other comments via private mail.
&
On 30/05/14 19:37, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
> [...]
> * Remove all Debian patchess that are now merged upstream.
^ patches
> [...]
>* Upgrade to new standars version.
^ standards
I just fixed now this two typos on t
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aircrack-ng"
* Package name: aircrack-ng
Version : 1:1.2-0~beta3-1
Upstream Author : Thomas d'Otreppe
* URL : http://www.aircrack-ng.org
* License
On 12/06/13 03:28, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-12 at 03:10 +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> Which package contains such oui file? Is there any package shipping
>> generic oui files to be shared or is every package shipping just his own
>> oui file?
>
On 11/06/13 02:47, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure if beta versions are welcome on Debian or should be avoided
>> if possible. My understanding is that it should be avoided if possible.
>
> Th
On 10/06/13 14:50, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why not work on aircrack-ng 1.2~beta1 instead ?
>
That's a good question.
I'm not sure if beta versions are welcome on Debian or should be avoided
if possible. My understanding is that it should be avoided if possible.
I was thinking in up
On 10/06/13 15:18, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 02:12:02PM +0200, Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez wrote:
>> * Remove unused Build-Depends on obsolete libnl-dev (Closes: #688158)
> ---end quoted text---
>
> Why is netlink support disabled ?
>
1.1 don'
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aircrack-ng"
* Package name: aircrack-ng
Version : 1:1.1-6
Upstream Author : Thomas d'Otreppe
* URL : http://www.aircrack-ng.org
* License : GPL-
On 03/01/12 15:49, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Carlos Alberto Lopez Perez , 2012-01-03, 15:30:
>> * http://mentors.debian.net/package/rdiff-backup
>>
>> $ dget
>> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_1.2.8-7.dsc
>>
>
> Version num
glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
I am attaching also the debdiff.
This new version should be pushed to stable, testing and sid (the package
version is the same on all cases).
Thanks!
--
~~~~~~~
Carlos Albe
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libpam-blue".
* Package name: libpam-blue
Version : 0.9.0-1
Upstream Author : Carlos Alberto Silombria Ibarra
* URL : http://pam.0xdef.net
* License : gpl
Section : admin
It bu
13 matches
Mail list logo
