Re: "public domain" software licensing and copyright?

At 01:22 PM 10/18/00 -0500, Michael A. Miller wrote: I'd like to package ImageJ: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ "ImageJ is a public domain Java image processing program inspired by NIH Image for the Macintosh. It runs, either as an online applet or as a downloadable application, on a

Re: "public domain" software licensing and copyright?

At 01:22 PM 10/18/00 -0500, Michael A. Miller wrote: >I'd like to package ImageJ: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ > > "ImageJ is a public domain Java image processing program > inspired by NIH Image for the Macintosh. It runs, either as an > online applet or as a downloadable applicatio

Re: Request for advice

At 06:55 PM 8/29/00 +0100, Roger Burton West wrote: On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 12:55:21AM -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > I'm curious to find some differeing opinions pro/con use of XML for >configuration files... IMHO one of the biggest advantages of Unix is that configuration files are plai

Re: Request for advice

At 06:55 PM 8/29/00 +0100, Roger Burton West wrote: >On Tue, Aug 29, 2000 at 12:55:21AM -0400, Jeremy T. Bouse wrote: > > I'm curious to find some differeing opinions pro/con use of XML for > >configuration files... > >IMHO one of the biggest advantages of Unix is that configuration files >a

Re: New key = New package?

At 12:45 PM 8/18/00 -0500, Bolan Meek wrote: Richard Braakman wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:36:26PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote: > > IIRC what happens is that a special signature is added to > > your key which informs of the new expiredate, > > and since this packet is signed by you it

Re: New key = New package?

At 12:45 PM 8/18/00 -0500, Bolan Meek wrote: >Richard Braakman wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:36:26PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote: > > > IIRC what happens is that a special signature is added to > > > your key which informs of the new expiredate, > > > and since this packet is signed

Re: gnupg signing

At 02:56 PM 7/28/00 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: > > > > I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am ready to > > post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how to sign m

Re: gnupg signing

At 02:56 PM 7/28/00 +0200, Andreas Rottmann wrote: >Christoph Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 10:23:25AM -0800, Britton wrote: > > > > > > I now have my key, scannec copy of id, etc. all in hand, and am ready to > > > post to new-maintainer, but I am not sure how

Re: PGP and verifying ids / emails

ssert that the two keys are in fact from the same person? >What pain is involved in telling pgp what key to use? > >Adam > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROT

Re: Why only one non-free section?

--On Friday, September 11, 1998, 3:59 PM +0200 "Stephane Bortzmeyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It seems there are a lot of problems with the non-free section, for instance > CDROM vendors who do not bother to check every licence individually and who > exclude the whole non-free tree. Basi

Re: what are the latest debian packaging tools.

ng run tell everyone what you have been doing, > your doing was worthless. Edwim Schrodinger > Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/> > Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E > >

real -basic- help...

linux" and "oldlinux". I find this very handy when I'm experimenting with new kernel configurations. I think others would find it useful as well, and I'd like to make a Debian package out of it. Where do I start? What should I read first? Later, Buddha -- Budd