RTS: XMailTool

2000-08-23 Thread Bolan Meek
Greetings: God bless you. A couple of months ago, I indicated my interest in adopting the orphaned package xmailtool. I've worked on this-and-that, and studied -the-other, found out that there is no active upstream maintainer, and so assayed to fulfil that role, also (see .sig). Anyway, I haven't

RTS: XMailTool

2000-08-23 Thread Bolan Meek
Greetings: God bless you. A couple of months ago, I indicated my interest in adopting the orphaned package xmailtool. I've worked on this-and-that, and studied -the-other, found out that there is no active upstream maintainer, and so assayed to fulfil that role, also (see .sig). Anyway, I haven'

Re: New key = New package?

2000-08-18 Thread Bolan Meek
Richard Braakman wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:36:26PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote: > > IIRC what happens is that a special signature is added to > > your key which informs of the new expiredate, > > and since this packet is signed by you its effectively as > > if you'd choosen another

Re: New key = New package?

2000-08-18 Thread Bolan Meek
Richard Braakman wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 04:36:26PM +0200, Stefan Alfredsson wrote: > > IIRC what happens is that a special signature is added to > > your key which informs of the new expiredate, > > and since this packet is signed by you its effectively as > > if you'd choosen another

Re: Warning: Me, too! (was Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working

2000-06-29 Thread Bolan Meek
Decklin Foster wrote: > > > Jim Westveer wrote: > > > > > > > > > ...oldest ...first, ...currently ...last August & September(1999) > > Hm. What about July 99? I was planning on resending soon anyway, but > maybe I should hold off Well, he said they were at 1999-8 & 9. Your above email

Re: Warning: Me, too! (was Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working

2000-06-29 Thread Bolan Meek
Decklin Foster wrote: > > > Jim Westveer wrote: > > > > > > > > > ...oldest ...first, ...currently ...last August & September(1999) > > Hm. What about July 99? I was planning on resending soon anyway, but > maybe I should hold off Well, he said they were at 1999-8 & 9. Your above email

Re: Warning: Me, too! (was Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine?)

2000-06-28 Thread Bolan Meek
esn't have anything against me. (hide internal, paranoiac cringing) > On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi Bolan Meek! > > > > You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > > > > Well, i have applied 6 weeks ago, and i'm not yet adde

Re: Warning: Me, too! (was Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine?)

2000-06-28 Thread Bolan Meek
esn't have anything against me. (hide internal, paranoiac cringing) > On Wed, 28 Jun 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Hi Bolan Meek! > > > > You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > > > > Well, i have applied 6 weeks ago, and i'm not yet

Re: Warning: Me, too! (was Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine?)

2000-06-28 Thread Bolan Meek
Summary: check your registered eaddr I checked your status, to test your claim, not in doubt, just for an experiment; your following address was not found. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > > Well, i have applied 6 weeks ago, and i'm not yet added to the da

Re: Warning: Me, too! (was Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine?)

2000-06-28 Thread Bolan Meek
Summary: check your registered eaddr I checked your status, to test your claim, not in doubt, just for an experiment; your following address was not found. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... > You ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > > > > > Well, i have applied 6 weeks ago, and i'm not yet added to the d

Warning: Me, too! (was Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine ?)

2000-06-27 Thread Bolan Meek
Julien BLACHE wrote: > > Jean-Marc Bourdaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > ... > > > Is there something wrong with the NM process ? > > Yes, a huge amount of people applying to become Debian maintainers... > > > Well, i have applied 6 weeks ago, and i'm not yet added to the database > >

Warning: Me, too! (was Re: NM : Dale Scheetz : is NM working fine ?)

2000-06-27 Thread Bolan Meek
Julien BLACHE wrote: > > Jean-Marc Bourdaret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit: > ... > > > Is there something wrong with the NM process ? > > Yes, a huge amount of people applying to become Debian maintainers... > > > Well, i have applied 6 weeks ago, and i'm not yet added to the database > >

Original License Requirement

2000-06-07 Thread Bolan Meek
Greetings: God bless you. I am wanting to update the source to xmailtool, now at version 3.1.2b, licensed for free use and modification by Cray -as long as the original source code is distributed with the mods. I am pondering whether this means that the source code package I upload, after I am a

Re: gpg couldn't import pgp keys

2000-06-01 Thread Bolan Meek
Julian Gilbey wrote: > > On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 12:20:02PM -0500, Bolan Meek wrote: > > Greetings: God bless you. > > > > I tried to import the debian-keyring.pgp, and gpg > > complained about each key, for example: > > > > gpg: key C4A8525B: unsupport

gpg couldn't import pgp keys

2000-05-31 Thread Bolan Meek
Greetings: God bless you. I tried to import the debian-keyring.pgp, and gpg complained about each key, for example: gpg: key C4A8525B: unsupported public key algorithm gpg: key C4A8525B: unsupported public key algorithm gpg: key C4A8525B: unsupported public key algorithm gpg: this may be caused b

Re: Why?: Two hello- packages

2000-05-29 Thread Bolan Meek
Josip Rodin wrote: > Thank you for weighing in on this also. > On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 02:16:39PM -0500, Bolan Meek wrote: > > ...and find myself with some missing bits of > > understanding as to exactly how a *.diff.gz is applied > > to the corresponding *.orig.tar.gz.

Why?: Two hello- packages

2000-05-29 Thread Bolan Meek
Greetings: God bless you. Having a aspiration to contribute back to the Debian project by becoming a developer, adopting an orphaned package or two, such as xmailtool, I'm trying to work through building from gotten sources, and find myself with some missing bits of understanding as to exactly ho