On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 04:23:15AM +, hungryh...@i2pmail.org wrote:
> Right, but I can't seem to figure out how to make it non-native. I think
> the problem is the missing ".orig" in the .tar.gz filename that
> dpkg-buildpackage produces, but I haven't been able to get
> dpkg-buildpackage to ad
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 03:09:53AM -0500, Elías Alejandro wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "radiotray".
>
> * Package name: radiotray
> Version : 0.5.1-1
> Upstream Author : Carlos Ribeiro
> * URL : http://radiotray.sourceforge.net/
> * License
On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 01:10:29PM +0100, Jaroslav Imrich wrote:
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my packages "ipwatchd".
>
> * Package name: ipwatchd
> Version : 1.2-1
> Upstream Author : Jaroslav Imrich
> * URL : http://ipwatchd.sf.net
> * License
On Tue, Jan 05, 2010 at 02:35:10PM +0100, Davide Cavalca wrote:
> Dear mentors,
Hello.
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "enna".
>
> * Package name: enna
> Version : 0.4.0-1
> Upstream Author : The Enna Project
> * URL : http://enna.geexbox.org
> * License
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:40:39AM +, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> My name is Tadeusz Struk. I'm looking for a sponsor for a Small
> Privacy Guard (http://sourceforge.net/projects/spg/)
> This software allows to encrypt/decrypt files as well as
> generate/verify signature of a file.
> It u
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 02:57:23AM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "moc".
>
> * Package name: moc
> Version : 1:2.5.0~alpha3-3
> Upstream Author : Damian Pietras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://moc.daper.net
> * License
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 10:03:21PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 1:2.5.0~alpha3-2
> of my package "moc".
[...]
> I would be glad if someone uploaded this package for me.
Uploaded.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PR
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 07:04:31PM +0200, Daniel Knabl wrote:
> after a long while I'm again searching for someone willing to sponsor
> and/or upload vexim to Debian.
>
> you can find the latest files here: http://tirolinux.net/~daniel/vexim/
> * http://tirolinux.net/~daniel/vexim/vexim_2.2.1-5.1
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:32:34PM +0100, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for my package "simutrans" (ITP #437627).
>
> * Package name: simutrans
> Version : 99.18~0.svn1661-1
> Upstream Author : Simutrans Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://w
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 04:00:06PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "aufs".
>
> * Package name: aufs
> Version : 0.0.cvs20070409-1
> Upstream Author : Junjiro Okajima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://aufs.sourceforge.net
On Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 12:11:36PM -0400, Ryan Coyner wrote:
> Hello Mr. Fenski
Hi.
> As the maintainer of the package calcurse (at least until yesterday) I
> was surprised, both good and bad, this morning to check my email and
> find that a new version of calcurse has been uploaded to Debian.
>
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 02:17:17PM +0100, gregor herrmann wrote:
> One of my packages is in the new queue, and now it needs a tiny
> change (a library it build-depends on changes it's package name).
> Can I use the same Debian revision for the updated package or do I
> have to bump the revision num
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 05:18:01PM +0100, Marco Cabizza wrote:
> Hello,
Hi.
> I'm trying to apply to the NM program so this whole email is quite
> newbie-ish. I've been making some gaim debs for the cvs version lately.
> It's quite stable and usable by now. Can this be a good candidate for
> exp
On Thu, Feb 02, 2006 at 07:40:17PM +0100, Pieter-Augustijn Van Malleghem wrote:
> I'm trying to package arpoison 0.6 (arpoison.sf.net). So far, so good:
> everything seems to work. I uploaded it to mentors.debian.net. If any of you
> would like to have a look ..
Someone already told you in your IT
On Thu, Dec 29, 2005 at 08:21:21AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > This command line application encodes and decodes base64 and can be
> > used in redirects and pipes etc.
>
> Can't you just use uuencode -m and uudecode?
Or openssl.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 01:29:09PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor for billard-gl. The new version, which can be found
> at[0] does no longer depend on xlibs-dev. The package builds clean in
> pbuilder and has no lintian or linda warnings.
Uploaded.
Since I'm mentioned a
On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 10:56:24AM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Can someone explain to me how to apply patches to upstream sources "the
> right way" or point me to an appropriate document?
`apt-get install dpatch`
You've got some examples in /usr/share/doc/dpatch/ then.
You can also take a lo
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 01:18:12AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> A chroot is a nice solution - I use it for many things.
>
> the program 'debootstrap' can help you building a chroot.
>
> just:
> mkdir sid-chroot
> sudo debootstrap sid sid-chroot http://yournearestmirror.
> sudo chroot sidchroot
>
On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 06:15:27AM +0100, Rudolf Weeber wrote:
> Sirc was offered for adoption by the QA team. I prepared a new version,
> closing a few of the bugs filed against it.
>
> As I'm not yet a DD, I'm looking for someone to check it, and sponsor
> the upload, wehn everything is right.
>
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:19:08PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > Is it a Bad Thing to use that library instead of depending on the
> > official packaged one?
>
> Yes(TM), it is a Bad Thing(TM).
>
> If the official library is suitable, then use it. It will:
>
> - absolve you of providing
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 09:48:30PM +0200, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote:
> Offtopic: anyone knows a similar application, but for Gnome?
http://beaglewiki.org/Main_Page
Already in Debian.
regards
fEnIo
--
,''`. Bartosz Fenski | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | pgp:0x13fefc40 | irc:fEnIo
: :' : 32
On Tue, Sep 20, 2005 at 02:40:19PM +0200, Roland Pontes wrote:
>a question about numbering my packet versions.
>i have an own apt-server for my own enviroment. i want to modify openvpn
>and several other packages (openvpn_2.0-1_i386.deb ).
>is there a guideline for numbering my
On Tue, Sep 13, 2005 at 05:58:06PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> Let's suppose I have uploaded a highly experimental new version of a
> package to experimental to get some testing. Weeks later, it (the
> parts changed wrt to the version sid) has been thoroughly tested, and
> I want to move it
On Mon, Aug 22, 2005 at 06:41:25PM +0200, Artur R. Czechowski wrote:
> A person which I usually bother to upload my packages is on holidays now
> and I have two packages to upload ASAP.
> php4-rrdtool and rrdcollect depend on librrd, which has changed SONAME last
> days and my packages are uninstal
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 07:23:08PM +0200, Ram Kumar DANGETI wrote:
> Is there a way to remove a package and all its dependencies ? with
>"apt-get remove" we can remove the base package, but I just want to know
>how we can remove the base package as well as all the dependencies whic
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 01:43:40PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The package I am seeking sponsorship for calculates and displays the size of
> files and or directories (supports multiple) and the total of the
> files/directories specified - I grew tired of stringing together commands
>
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:20:48AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
> http://sponsors.debian.net is now around 90% finished, so I'm looking
> for people to try and break it :)
Great ;)
[...]
> So, please pop along and register.
I've just played with it a little, and AFAICS it doesn't support seve
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 03:28:58PM +0200, pedro silva wrote:
>hello!
>
>2005/8/16, Roberto C. Sanchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It appears that the package is already in Debian, though it has been
> orphaned. You may want to state that, as I was confused why someone
> would
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 12:16:31PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
> >> I already have a flpsed package in unstable. Unfortunately my usual
> >> sponsor, Bill Allombert, is unavailable to do a new upload.
> >>
> >> The new package fixes grave bug #321430 (uninstallable due to C++ ABI
> >> transi
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 12:31:03PM +0200, Morten Brix Pedersen wrote:
> Hi,
Hello.
> I already have a flpsed package in unstable. Unfortunately my usual
> sponsor, Bill Allombert, is unavailable to do a new upload.
>
> The new package fixes grave bug #321430 (uninstallable due to C++ ABI
> tran
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:06:58PM -0400, Kevin Coyner wrote:
> I've just started using pbuilder to build my packages and have run
> into the following error when trying to build a package:
>
> checking for sigaction... yes
> checking for strftime... yes
> checking for X... no
> checking for XOpen
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 02:08:02PM -0300, Margarita Manterola wrote:
> > Is there a standard way to get the old package version and compare it to
> > the new one?
>
> As shown in the Upgrading diagram I made some time ago [1], and also,
> as it is explained in the Debian Policy [2], when doing an
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 12:10:50AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> If you can't understand what you are packaging, you shouldn't be
> packaging it, IMHO.
So maybe our documentation should state that?
I mean something like "if your're going to package something written in
Python it is highly recommend
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 09:46:10PM +0700, Basil Shubin wrote:
> A collection of Russian fortune cookies, from various sources.
> his package can be replacement for or an addition to the fortunes
> package to let fortune speak Russian.
>
> I have packaged fortunes-ru, so long awaited by russian com
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:47:29PM +0200, Geoffroy Carrier wrote:
> I'm Geoffroy Carrier, a student from Grenoble, France.
> I've been using Debian GNU/Linux for years, and I (nearly) always wanted
> to become a maintainer.
>
> I have been reading all the important documentation these days: that's
On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 09:25:35PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> Hi mentors!
Hello.
[...]
> It's released under Artistic license, linda and lintian clean and builds
> OK on pbuilder.
>
> Package, source and other files available at
> http://biolinux.df.ibilce.unesp.br/naoliv/qsf/
>
>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 02:57:38PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> - ipcalc - Parameter calculator for IPv4 addresses
> : http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/ipcalc.html
I would be interested in adoptioning or co-maintaining this package, since
I'm using it quite often.
So please decide whether
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 11:21:54PM -0600, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
> The new cogito package (0.11.3+20050610-1) is on its way into sid.
> It does not install /usr/bin/git or /usr/bin/cg, and so it does not
> conflict with git or with cgvg.
>
> I made a note about this in /usr/share/doc/cogito/RE
On Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 04:51:18PM +0200, Martin Mewes wrote:
> maybe this is a most wanted question, but maybe someone can dump the
> information to me.
>
> I am not a developer but I have started trying to pack things for debian
> but somehow it is to complex for me. So I thought about to spon
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 02:09:39PM +0200, Njes Nilsen wrote:
[...]
> What I want is to edit the installation so the user get another option
> here, which will install some given packages.
> I've read some of the information about how to hack the installer on the
> debian wiki page, but can't
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:56:47AM +0200, Victor Seva wrote:
> I created the pwc-source package [1] and now its in new queue
> pending to be included on sid [2].
> Sean Finney its my sponsor but We have no experience on kernel modules
> packages. And We want to make pre-built modules for official
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 12:01:06PM +0300, Shachar Shemesh wrote:
[...]
> Now here are the questions:
> 1. What is the correct order of things? Should I first upload a package
> for argtable, wait for it to pass ftpmasters, and only then upload the
> latest rsyncrypto version, or should I upload
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 09:22:28PM +0200, Mauro Darida wrote:
> I have written an advanced debian tutorial and decided to try to build a
> debian package from it. I used the pdf format as source and, after reading
> the maintainer stuff, tried to build the package thinking it would be easy
> sin
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 04:39:07PM +0100, Rob Bradford wrote:
> > * You don't close your WNPP bugs with changelogs entries.
>
> Uhm. No, I don't think thats right. Its a very common practices to close
> ITP bugs with the initial release, O/ITA bugs with the first upload by
> the new maintainer.
On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 10:28:28PM +1200, Carlos Z.F. Liu wrote:
> Hello, dear mentors
Hello.
> I'm looking for a sponsor willing to check and upload deb packages for
> python-pychm and gnochm. python-pychm is the python binding for CHMLIB
> library, and gnochm is the file viewer based on python
On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 08:25:57PM +1000, David Clarke wrote:
> > Nico probably wants to see the *.dsc and *.diff.gz files
> > as well.
> >
> There's no diff file as it's a native package (that's right isn't it?).
No that's not right.
You should make .orig.tar.gz file without your debian/* stuf
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 03:33:28PM -0500, Johnny Mast wrote:
> My question is simple, to find a sponsor i need to have my project being
> ready
> for distribution if i am correct ??..
Well if you don't consider your project to be in releasable state, then
why would you like to distribute it?
rega
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 02:26:39PM +0200, Johnny Mast wrote:
> Hello there im looking for a sponsor/mentor for my extreme ftpd
> package can you guys help me out ?
That's proper place for such request but not proper form.
Usually if someone is looking for sponsor he/she pastes here information
ab
On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 12:53:57PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
> Whee!
Hello.
> So, uhm... They say that fonts are among the easiest things to package,
> and thus probably also to check. Here's one that I'm looking a sponsor
> for:
>
> Package: ttf-antp
> Apt line: deb-src http://mentors.de
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 12:39:15PM -0300, Lucas Di Pentima wrote:
> Hi there,
Hello.
> I'm packaging ZABBIX (http://www.zabbix.com), a resource monitor &
> agent. The original programs in the upstream source tgz file are
> generated with names like this:
>
> * zabbix_agent
> * zabbix_agentd
> *
On Fri, Apr 22, 2005 at 05:30:20PM -0400, Michael Appleman wrote:
>I'm trying my hand at making a debian package(of
>[1]http://www.kmuddy.net/), and am following the debian new maintainers
>guide. I'm to the part where I need to find out the build dependancies and
>ran the shell scr
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 06:27:52PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> >I disagree. ./debian is the domain of the Debian maintainer, not of
> >the upstream. Unless you are developing software *for* *Debian*
> >(native), there is no reason why you should bother with ./debian at
> >all.
> >
> What a
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 01:13:15PM +0200, Charles Majola wrote:
> Is editing upstream's makefile ok? the package doesn't use autoconf, it
> just has a makefile with install and clean targets.
>
> I need it to install the python files it contains in a diff directory,
> not the one in the makefile
On Sat, Mar 12, 2005 at 09:49:41AM +, Qingning Huo wrote:
> I am working on these two packages: libtorrent and rtorrent [1]. There
> are no copyright claims on any source files or README files. There is
> only an AUTHORS file with the name and email of the author. On the
> other hand, it is
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:09:34PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> > Procedure is mentioned at WNPP pages. And there is some bugreport against
> > setserial. Wishlist with updated translation, but it's still bugreport ;)
>
> Yes but that is already added in 2.17-40.
So I see no reason for keeping this
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:49:45PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> > > However I'm not a DD so I would need a sponsor.
> > > Would there be anyone willing to help me?
> >
> > Request for sponsor for some package should contain:
> >
> > 1) description of package
>
> I thought that this is already debia
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:03:59PM +0200, Jan Zizka wrote:
> I would like to takeover the maintanence of setserial
> package since it's current maintainer if looking for
> a replacement.
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=285355
>
> However I'm not a DD so I would need a sponsor
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 08:19:21PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
> > I've packaged gaim-extendedprefs and closed the ITP bug in revision
> > 3 but my sponsors upload was not accepted by katie due to a missing
> > .orig.tar.gz. On request of my sponsor I'm making some changes to
> > the package, and I
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:46:44PM +, Noel Torres wrote:
> BTW, How to cope with Makefile having to create two different packages?
You don't have to cope with Makefile in that case. Just ensure that all
files are put in debian/tmp with `make install`, and the move them to
debian/library1 and d
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 05:11:54PM +, Ben Hill wrote:
> > > I'm updating some code from an upstream source, so do I give this
> > > version a different version number?
> > >
> > > For example, if it's 0.3.1, should I call it 0.3.1.1 or use a different
> > > format?
> >
> > No. In my opinion i
On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 07:49:45PM +0900, Masami Ichikawa wrote:
> uploaded bookmarkbridge.
> http://moonlinux.sourceforge.jp/debian/
If you still don't have sponsor for that package, then I could upload it
for you.
There is however BIG problem in your package.
Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Masami Ichikawa wrote:
> >>browsers. It is aware of X, y and z browsers and bookmark formats.
> >
> > I'm not familiar with those browsers. Are they packaged for Debian?
> >
> bookmarkbridge is supports these browser.
> Internet Explorer, Opera, Mozil
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 10:52:48PM +, Helder Correia wrote:
> Hello!
Hello.
> I have used many GNU/Linux systems for 8 years, but only very recently I
> "found" Debian, or at least the real wonder it is :)
> I would like to start the process of becoming a DD as soon as possible, so I
> wan
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:22:16AM +0100, Antoine Jacquet wrote:
> Hello again,
Hello.
> I am also looking for a sponsor for the following package :
>
> Package: irssistats
> Licence: GPL
> Description: This tool generates HTML IRC stats based on irssi logs
Try to avoid starting description wi
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 02:41:12AM -0400, Maykel Moya wrote:
> I'm giving a try to pbuilder. I launched it with --no-targz to not
> download everything with every build.
>
> It's possible to tell pbuilder to get packages
> from /var/cache/apt/archives ? Yes, I did a script that parses
> pbuilder
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 09:18:34PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking for someone who might be willing to sponsor an upload for the
> billard-gl package. I have submitted an ITA for the package a while back
> (bug #236582) and have been working on patches for outstanding bugs.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:08:50AM -0500, Chris Sacca wrote:
> This is a single binary package. It's small, lintian and linda clean, I
> have the blessing of the upstream maintainer, and have filed and ITP (
> #292667 ).
You don't close it in your changelog entry. That's wrong.
[...]
> Hopef
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 10:27:08PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I take it you are upstream as well? I think the recommended way of
> >doing upstream+debian is to have the .diff include all of ./debian/,
> >such that other distros don't have to deal with it. Also, that way
> >you can do a De
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 09:11:15AM -0500, spencer wrote:
> I'm trying to install xchat using the
> synaptic package manager, could someone
> tell me the section I will find that in?
That's rather debian-user question.
([EMAIL PROTECTED])~$apt-cache show xchat | grep Section
Section: net
([EMAIL P
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 05:22:44PM +0200, Mugurel Tudor wrote:
> > I created some DEB packages, and everything is OK with one exception:
> > for every package that I created, at instalation time, I get the
> > following error (on Debian Stable and also on Debian Unstable):
> >
>
> I have to menti
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 04:57:16PM +0200, Mugurel Tudor wrote:
> I created some DEB packages, and everything is OK with one exception:
> for every package that I created, at instalation time, I get the
> following error (on Debian Stable and also on Debian Unstable):
>
> # apt-get install foo
> Re
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 10:55:13PM +0100, Rafael Fernández López wrote:
> Hi you all guys !!
Hello.
> I'm looking for a package that I like to keep it care of. I'm not sure
> which to take. I'm a University student from Spain and I've to say that
> I've a little time everyday to check for updat
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 03:29:48PM -0600, micah milano wrote:
> I've packaged lkcdtuils and it is in the archive. It has not been
> ported by upstream to m68k, but I just got an important bug
> (Bug#291273) filed against the package because of FTBS on m68k. Should
> this not be a wishlist bug for t
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 07:53:06AM -0500, Ryan Stutsman wrote:
> Any takers? It's a very simple package.
Didn't you think about splitting it to two packages?
Consider that Debian supports 11 archs right now.
Your package is 800k big.
11 * 800k = 8,8M
Using one binary dependent package + one in
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 02:54:45PM -0500, Ryan Stutsman wrote:
> It's available at
>
> http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/rstutsma/debian/
Ok. Here goes my comments:
First of all you made it as native Debian package. That's definitelly
wrong. You should put upstream sources as anagramarama_0.2.origt
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 02:03:23PM -0500, Ryan Stutsman wrote:
> With the aim of eventually becoming a full devel I have finished package
> my first ever package.
Nice.
> I'd be much appreciative if someone would take a look at sponsoring it
> for inclusion in main.
>
> Here is an overview of t
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:47:14PM -0500, James Richardson wrote:
> I have just packaged balance a generic userland tcp proxy with failover
> and round robin functionality.
>
> Balance can also be controlled at run time via simple command line
> interface.
>
> Please take a look at
> http://www.j
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 05:31:06PM -0500, James Richardson wrote:
> Greetings,
> I request a sponsor for the setserial package.
>
> I use this package regularly and would like to see it well maintained.
>
> This will close out bug# 285355.
Great... but the usual way to find sponsors is to includ
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 01:01:35AM -0800, TIFR students wrote:
> I guess we can get the additional packages we want from the net,after
> installing this minimal ISO.But the problem is,how then,do we convert
> the whole thing into an ISO that we want.
You got some hints from others. I would like
Hello.
I prepared packages for Clanlib development branch.
I think everyone knows what it is so I won't describe it here.
Is someone interested in doing sponsored upload to experimental
distribution?
Packages can be fetched from http://skawina.eu.org/clanlib/
regards
fEnIo
--
_ Bar
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 05:32:12PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> > We need to know the following.
> > How to create a virtual or convinience package for debian web site listing.
> > For example a package called 'kdeedu' contains all the educational
> > packages like khangman,kalzium etc.
> > What
On Wed, Dec 22, 2004 at 10:38:58AM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
[...]
> which seems to be used elsewhere. I thought lintian enforced this,
> but I can't seem to find it in the code. I'm opening a couple bugs
> now we speak.
Well the problem is that dh_make had wrong template few weeks ago.
I fi
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 01:13:29PM +0100, Maciej Dems wrote:
> > How does your package differ from konwert?
> > Has it got some advantages?
>
> These two packages have very similar functionality. I dont know konwert
> very well so I cannot tell much about differences between these two
> packages
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:20:53AM +0100, Maciej Dems wrote:
> Currently I would like to add some of my packages to Debian. The first one
> should be polcnv - Polish diacritics conventer, a tool simmilar to recode
> but much easier to use.
Hi Maciek.
How does your package differ from konwert?
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 10:39:37PM +, Helen Faulkner wrote:
> Hi,
Hello.
> I hope this isn't a too dumb question!
;)
> I'm the maintainer for xwrits, and partway through the NM process. My
> application manager (Frank Lichtenheld) has sent me a review of my
> packages, and I am confused
On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 10:05:28PM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
> >In any event, the program starts in a terminal environment, but ultimately
> >must be run in an x11 environment.
>
> What does it need the terminal for? I mean if it actually runs in its
> own X11 window, what does it use the termin
Hello.
My usual sponsor didn't respond for my mail for more than a week now, and
he isn't marked as on vacation.
Since my new package fixes all (6) outstanding bugs and is needed for other
package which depends on it, I'm looking for some other one time or even
permanent sponsor.
Here goes infor
Hello.
My usual sponsor didn't respond for my mail for more than a week now, and
he isn't marked as on vacation.
Since my new package fixes all (6) outstanding bugs and is needed for other
package which depends on it, I'm looking for some other one time or even
permanent sponsor.
Here goes infor
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:06:01PM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
> > Most of the apps are using `./configure && make && make install` so dh_make
> > tries to use that way.
> > In fact the only file you need is debian/rules.
> > It should be Makefile which create your package.
>
> What bugs me is that
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 04:06:01PM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
> > Most of the apps are using `./configure && make && make install` so dh_make
> > tries to use that way.
> > In fact the only file you need is debian/rules.
> > It should be Makefile which create your package.
>
> What bugs me is that
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:47:45AM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
[...]
> First:
> 1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of
> scripts built on top of each other is really confusing.
I'd agree it's pretty confusing, but only first time.
It's quite easy to understand it.
>
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:47:45AM -0600, Zach Garner wrote:
[...]
> First:
> 1. The sheer number of helper scripts, with layers and layers of
> scripts built on top of each other is really confusing.
I'd agree it's pretty confusing, but only first time.
It's quite easy to understand it.
>
s time.
>
> I haven't gotten any e-mails from you since the automated upload e-mail.
> Check your mail logs.
Hmm..
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:19:18 +0200
From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new asc
I didn't receive any retur
s time.
>
> I haven't gotten any e-mails from you since the automated upload e-mail.
> Check your mail logs.
Hmm..
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 20:19:18 +0200
From: Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: new asc
I didn't receive any retur
Hello.
I'm looking for one-time-sponsor for my package asc.
Usually Matthew Palmer uploads asc package for me, but he doesn't respond
for my mails so I'm looking for someone else to upload it this time.
Here goes relevant information:
Package name: asc - turn-based strategy game
Advanced Strate
Hello.
I'm looking for one-time-sponsor for my package asc.
Usually Matthew Palmer uploads asc package for me, but he doesn't respond
for my mails so I'm looking for someone else to upload it this time.
Here goes relevant information:
Package name: asc - turn-based strategy game
Advanced Strate
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:15:40PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What can I do about the forwarded problem?
> I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the
> same problem.
> Any pointers?
>
> Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz,
On Fri, Oct 15, 2004 at 04:15:40PM -0300, Leo Costela Antunes wrote:
> Hi all
>
> What can I do about the forwarded problem?
> I tried reuploading the files + the orig.tar.gz, but it generated the
> same problem.
> Any pointers?
>
> Rejected: pearpc_0.3.1-2.dsc refers to pearpc_0.3.1.orig.tar.gz,
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 05:06:10PM +0200, Mathias Weidner wrote:
> I'm looking for a sponsor to help me get this package into debian.
>
> Package name : siefs
> Version : 0.2
> Upstream Author : Dmitry Zakharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> URL : http://mirror01.iptelecom.net.ua
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 04:16:06PM +0200, Julien Louis wrote:
> * Package name: msmtp
> Version : 1.2.3
> Upstream Author : Martin Lambers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://msmtp.sourceforge.net
> * License : GPL
> Description : smtp client which can be
1 - 100 of 335 matches
Mail list logo
