Last I checked you can't distribute parts of Sun's java anyway, only
the *precise* installer files provided by Sun. You're not even allowed
to stuff the installer inside a .deb package. Blackdown had to get
explicit permission from Sun to distribute their versi
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 02:25:43AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 01:02:05AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 03:44:54PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Have you tried http://bugs.qa.debian.org/?
> >
> > htt
in/standard.cgi says that bison has 3
serious bugs.
Page discarded as useless due to wanton inaccuracy.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
pgpAWnrPLdXZZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
hat bison has 3
serious bugs.
Page discarded as useless due to wanton inaccuracy.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gt; SL> arch-independent and arch-dependent objects.
>
> Doesn't apply to Ruby.
"Ruby sucks". Ignore it. Arch-indep to share, arch-dep to lib, screw
everything else.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http
gt; SL> arch-independent and arch-dependent objects.
>
> Doesn't apply to Ruby.
"Ruby sucks". Ignore it. Arch-indep to share, arch-dep to lib, screw
everything else.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http
at has a GPL
license attached.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
at has a GPL
license attached.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
w
gure determines it
> automatically, not so?
Not when cross-compiling, no. And since it's harmless enough the rest
of the time, debian packages can (and generally should) let
dpkg-architecture decide what to use, not config.guess.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux **
e determines it
> automatically, not so?
Not when cross-compiling, no. And since it's harmless enough the rest
of the time, debian packages can (and generally should) let
dpkg-architecture decide what to use, not config.guess.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** |
That is not an argument for using debbugs on master.
Moreover, _none_ of the above points are arguments specifically to use
the BTS, they could equally apply to all kinds of other systems. So
far this has been an exercise in sophistry.
--
.''`.
That is not an argument for using debbugs on master.
Moreover, _none_ of the above points are arguments specifically to use
the BTS, they could equally apply to all kinds of other systems. So
far this has been an exercise in sophistry.
--
.''`.
evelopers of limewire want to force people to view the ads,
they must write this into the license (and we punt it to non-free),
otherwise it is completely futile to try and make people do so.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debia
evelopers of limewire want to force people to view the ads,
they must write this into the license (and we punt it to non-free),
otherwise it is completely futile to try and make people do so.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debia
nestly,
> I don't believe DAM is that sloppy, and I wouldn't worry about it...
> Given how often people complain about the process being slow, I think
> it's clear that DAM takes the job very seriously :)
Without firm identification, if he roots all the debian hosts an
nestly,
> I don't believe DAM is that sloppy, and I wouldn't worry about it...
> Given how often people complain about the process being slow, I think
> it's clear that DAM takes the job very seriously :)
Without firm identification, if he roots all the debian hosts an
uld
> go in /usr/(s)bin.
s/Binaries/Architecture-dependent files/
s/run/use/g
Double-check that the files really are architecture-dependent. If not,
they belong in /usr/share.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.
uld
> go in /usr/(s)bin.
s/Binaries/Architecture-dependent files/
s/run/use/g
Double-check that the files really are architecture-dependent. If not,
they belong in /usr/share.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.
ch
add spurious extra warnings on top of this are INCREDIBLY annoying).
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
which
add spurious extra warnings on top of this are INCREDIBLY annoying).
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- |
support and a
> default skin, ready to be used.
You have got to be kidding. Read any one of the half a dozen prior
threads about this and how it cannot be packaged, due to license,
patent, and upstream arsehole issues.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/L
gui support and a
> default skin, ready to be used.
You have got to be kidding. Read any one of the half a dozen prior
threads about this and how it cannot be packaged, due to license,
patent, and upstream arsehole issues.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/L
+ or something) and upload that.
Most likely when building the first one you forgot to rename the
.tar.gz to .orig.tar.gz.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial Co
+ or something) and upload that.
Most likely when building the first one you forgot to rename the
.tar.gz to .orig.tar.gz.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`-http://www.debian.org/ | London, UK
PGP signature
ch shouldn't
have the brackets there. Either there is one author, or multiple
authors.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`-http://www.debian.org/ | London, UK
pgpMeLD1765aP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ch shouldn't
have the brackets there. Either there is one author, or multiple
authors.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`-http://www.debian.org/ | London, UK
PGP signature
PROTECTED]>
This person receives new application requests and passes them to
appropriate Application Managers. This is "the contact of last resort"
when other committee contacts fail to respond.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' :
PROTECTED]>
This person receives new application requests and passes them to
appropriate Application Managers. This is "the contact of last resort"
when other committee contacts fail to respond.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew
/LinuxDoc/DebianDoc are all easy to build. Anything else
shouldn't be too hard either. There is nothing about SGML that
requires any particular parsing engine be used, if it really is SGML
and not just something like SGML. jade will probably do it.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Li
rade old-version' will success and this will make
> beilive that downgrade is a success.
>
> (Remember, old is newer than new since it's a downgrade)
You may just have to say that all prior versions are bugged in this
respect and leave them alone, but from h
/LinuxDoc/DebianDoc are all easy to build. Anything else
shouldn't be too hard either. There is nothing about SGML that
requires any particular parsing engine be used, if it really is SGML
and not just something like SGML. jade will probably do it.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Li
rade old-version' will success and this will make
> beilive that downgrade is a success.
>
> (Remember, old is newer than new since it's a downgrade)
You may just have to say that all prior versions are bugged in this
respect and leave them alone, but from h
t now.
>
> dpkg-buildpackage does this, yes. I couldn't tell you what piece of the chain
> it is that actually does the work. It caught me completely by (pleasant)
> surprise the first time I saw this happen.
I would imagine it is dpkg-genchanges, which looks in .. for any file
quires the
package be --purged, reinstalled, and then a pre-upgrade version of
the data files restored from backup media.
Also warn during the upgrade of the package.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : | Dept. of Computing,
`. `&#x
couldn't tell you what piece of the chain
> it is that actually does the work. It caught me completely by (pleasant)
> surprise the first time I saw this happen.
I would imagine it is dpkg-genchanges, which looks in .. for any files
which have been built from t
e requires the
package be --purged, reinstalled, and then a pre-upgrade version of
the data files restored from backup media.
Also warn during the upgrade of the package.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : | Dept. of Co
esn't depend on ipv4, but will probably break horribly if you don't
have networking support in your kernel, along with most network daemon
packages.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : | Dept. of Computing,
`.
esn't depend on ipv4, but will probably break horribly if you don't
have networking support in your kernel, along with most network daemon
packages.
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : | Dept. of Computing,
`. `'
h both, but don't
interfere with the local system default unless you have to.
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
pgpWXkeb2ODX7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
h both, but don't
interfere with the local system default unless you have to.
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
PGP signature
, actually, I shamelessly pasted an example out of the first
postinst I had to hand and attempted to adapt it, which happened to be
the one for dancer. I am clearly loosing the ability to think, so I
will shut up now.
s/ircd/server/ or something.
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
y thing it could be. Your init.d script is failing and
returning 1. It is bugged, fix it. Hint: --oknodo parameter to
start-stop-daemon (look it up).
> Is this a bug in debhelper ?
Yes actually, it should be guarded with a -e:
if [ -e "/etc/init.d/superviser-ircd" ]; then
/etc/init.d/superviser-ircd stop
fi
However, this is not the problem here (wrong error message). (My
debhelper guards it, I don't know why your's hasn't)
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
pgpPdyPCDZjWZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gt;
Yes, actually, I shamelessly pasted an example out of the first
postinst I had to hand and attempted to adapt it, which happened to be
the one for dancer. I am clearly loosing the ability to think, so I
will shut up now.
s/ircd/server/ or something.
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
could be. Your init.d script is failing and
returning 1. It is bugged, fix it. Hint: --oknodo parameter to
start-stop-daemon (look it up).
> Is this a bug in debhelper ?
Yes actually, it should be guarded with a -e:
if [ -e "/etc/init.d/superviser-ircd" ]; then
/etc/init.d/superviser-ircd stop
fi
However, this is not the problem here (wrong error message). (My
debhelper guards it, I don't know why your's hasn't)
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
PGP signature
I'm looking for somebody to sponsor an upload of blootbot, all the
stuff is at http://asuffield.n3.net/debian
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
pgplUHOqfcSOl.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I'm looking for somebody to sponsor an upload of blootbot, all the
stuff is at http://asuffield.n3.net/debian
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
PGP signature
t `distclean'
Use distclean-local and clean-local, read the texinfo docs on automake,
section "Extending" (near the bottom).
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
pgpTvuQxZcaLz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t `distclean'
Use distclean-local and clean-local, read the texinfo docs on automake,
section "Extending" (near the bottom).
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dept. of Computing, Imperial College, London, UK
PGP signature
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:09:51PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can&#
On Wed, May 09, 2001 at 08:09:51PM +0200, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote:
> Eric Van Buggenhaut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 09:53:44PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > > It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian,
a debian
> package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there
> already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized?
It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can't
be legally redistributed in binary form.
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PR
as a debian
> package and was wondering if there are any objections? is there
> already a maintainer? can this packet be debianized?
It can be debianised, but it can't be included in debian, since it can't
be legally redistributed in binary form.
--
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP signature
52 matches
Mail list logo
