Re: Bug#351951: ITP: wengophone -- A free SIP softphone

2006-02-22 Thread Anand Kumria
Hi Macro, On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 04:32:54PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2006 at 02:19:57AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote: > > > Package: wnpp > > > Severity: wishlist > >

Re: Bug#351951: ITP: wengophone -- A free SIP softphone

2006-02-22 Thread Anand Kumria
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 08:21:42PM +0100, Marco Nenciarini wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Marco Nenciarini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: wengophone > Version : 0.99+svn4179 why not openwengo as the package name btw? > Upstream Author : Wengo SAS >

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-21 Thread Anand Kumria
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:47:21PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > comments inline. > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:16:56PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:36:50 -0600, "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > >On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:54:31PM +0100,

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-21 Thread Anand Kumria
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 09:52:51AM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:01:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | > You must have heard many times by now that Debian is a volunteer effort, > and > | > things are done on a time-available basis. > | > | Of course we all know t

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-21 Thread Anand Kumria
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:31:55AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >... > > If it takes a year to complete my application, I will quit. I have a number > > of other projects I'd like to do - Project Gutenberg, GCC, several free > > software projects of

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-21 Thread Anand Kumria
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 02:47:21PM -1000, Brian Russo wrote: > comments inline. > > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 12:16:56PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > At Fri, 12 Jan 2001 11:36:50 -0600, "Christian T. Steigies" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > >On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 05:54:31PM +0100, T.P

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-21 Thread Anand Kumria
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 09:52:51AM +0100, Fredrik Steen wrote: > On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 07:01:19PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | > You must have heard many times by now that Debian is a volunteer effort, and > | > things are done on a time-available basis. > | > | Of course we all know thi

Re: When is DAM approval supposed to happen?

2001-01-21 Thread Anand Kumria
On Sat, Jan 13, 2001 at 12:31:55AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Fri, 12 Jan 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >... > > If it takes a year to complete my application, I will quit. I have a number > > of other projects I'd like to do - Project Gutenberg, GCC, several free > > software projects of

Re: how change my e-mail in NM queue?

2000-11-04 Thread Anand Kumria
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 05:23:26PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > I am registered in the new maintainer database as an un-assigned applicant > with my business e-mail account. > I would like to change it to my new private account. > How I can do it? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask them to cha

Re: bugscan?

2000-11-04 Thread Anand Kumria
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 10:29:46PM +0800, zhaoway wrote: > i heard on debian-devel that there's a `bugscan'. is there any > infomation? It is a periodic message listing critical bugs and it is sent out on the debian-devel-archive mailing list (which is low volume, and which you should be subscribe

Re: how change my e-mail in NM queue?

2000-11-04 Thread Anand Kumria
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 05:23:26PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > I am registered in the new maintainer database as an un-assigned applicant > with my business e-mail account. > I would like to change it to my new private account. > How I can do it? Email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and ask them to ch

Re: bugscan?

2000-11-04 Thread Anand Kumria
On Sat, Nov 04, 2000 at 10:29:46PM +0800, zhaoway wrote: > i heard on debian-devel that there's a `bugscan'. is there any > infomation? It is a periodic message listing critical bugs and it is sent out on the debian-devel-archive mailing list (which is low volume, and which you should be subscrib

Re: Signing my package using pgp

2000-10-25 Thread Anand Kumria
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:08:13PM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:54:31AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > > The restriction on additions I can understand by why the restriction on > > updates? > > I may be wrong there, lets make it an AFAIK. > &g

Re: Signing my package using pgp

2000-10-25 Thread Anand Kumria
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:03:54PM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote: > > Although, only keys which are present in the pgp keyring will be > recognised. since keyring-maint will not add any new keys, or update any > current keys in the pgp ring. The restriction on additions I can understand by why the

Re: Signing my package using pgp

2000-10-25 Thread Anand Kumria
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 01:08:13PM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 10:54:31AM +1100, Anand Kumria wrote: > > The restriction on additions I can understand by why the restriction on > > updates? > > I may be wrong there, lets make it an AFAIK. >

Re: Signing my package using pgp

2000-10-25 Thread Anand Kumria
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 12:03:54PM +1300, Michael Beattie wrote: > > Although, only keys which are present in the pgp keyring will be > recognised. since keyring-maint will not add any new keys, or update any > current keys in the pgp ring. The restriction on additions I can understand by why th

Re: gpg couldn't import pgp keys

2000-06-04 Thread Anand Kumria
On Sun, 4 Jun 2000, Julian Gilbey wrote: > On Mon, Jun 05, 2000 at 07:51:34AM +1000, Anand Kumria wrote: > > Only somewhat; I've discovered that gpg wants to lock PGP > > style public keyrings - listing one on /usr/share/keyrings > > means it will fail. > > >

Re: gpg couldn't import pgp keys

2000-06-04 Thread Anand Kumria
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 11:47:57AM +1000, Timshel Knoll wrote: > On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 10:01:35AM -0500, Bolan Meek wrote: > > > > Julian, Josip, thank you. I encountered a challenge reconfiguring > > the apt get method of dselect to obtain access to this section, > > having to actually ftp to

Re: How should I deal with config. file moves?

1998-04-05 Thread Anand Kumria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Sat, 4 Apr 1998, Daniel Martin at cush wrote: > Now my question is: how should I handle the transition for people who > have modified their /etc/X11/fvwm95/system.fvwm95rc-menu? What I'm > planning to do (I got this idea from fvwm2) is in the preinst check >

Re: mtr done, someone care to test?

1998-02-23 Thread Anand Kumria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Scott Ellis wrote: > On Tue, 24 Feb 1998, Anand Kumria wrote: > > No, moving normal files is completly transparent. Although I have a > general objection to moving mtr into /usr/sbin, I use network diagnostic > programs all

Re: mtr done, someone care to test?

1998-02-23 Thread Anand Kumria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Mon, 23 Feb 1998, Scott Ellis wrote: > I hate to mention this, but someone has already uploaded mtr (seeing as I > have the package installed right now). Yes, probably Christoph Lambert. However it is (was) listed on the wnpp report; and [EMAIL PROTECTED] ma

mtr done, someone care to test?

1998-02-23 Thread Anand Kumria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Okay, I think I've got everything worked out so that I know how to build mtr using deb-make. What is missing is depenancies for hamm, and a compilation against glibc2 - I'll probably tackle that once I have been confirmed as a Debian developer. The other things

Re: conventions for packaging.

1998-02-20 Thread Anand Kumria
On Sat, 21 Feb 1998, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > on a hamm system? I currently only have a bo system, should I apply for an > > account on master and do the package generate their? (is it a hamm system) > > Or should I wait until boot disks for hamm become available? Gawk. I meant of course "do the

Re: help needed

1998-02-20 Thread Anand Kumria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Fook_Sheng Chan wrote: > I wish to become a debian developer, but I don't know where to start. > I can program in C, but I must admit that I'm not very good. Probably the best place to start is the Developers' Corner http://www.debian.org/d

Re: conventions for packaging.

1998-02-20 Thread Anand Kumria
On Fri, 20 Feb 1998, Joey Hess wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Yes that sounds useful. I know that your pdmenu supports popping > > up a box to ask for parameters; I would assume that there's nothing > > in the Debian menu system to tell the menu system to do this though > > because it would no

conventions for packaging.

1998-02-19 Thread Anand Kumria
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- I've decided to try my hand at being a debian developer; and have picked mtr (from the orphaned list) as something to try. Some questions: - - should it be installed in /usr/sbin (it is a set-uid network diag program) - - is the man page regarded as architectur