On 25/01/2025 08:08, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
Sales pitch aside, this is a self-compiling package, so there is a
binary blob in there and lots of funny things,
I haven't looked at the package at all, but this sounds like a "no", if it
can't be bootstrapped with an already existing compiler.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "freebasic":
* Package name : freebasic
Version : 1.10.1+ds-1
Upstream contact : https://github.com/freebasic/fbc/issues
* URL : https://www.freebasic.net/
On 21/01/2025 20:33, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
Hi Ahmad,
Le 2025-01-21 19:28, Ahmad Khalifa a écrit :
I'll play around with 2 sources and 2 branches on 1 salsa repo. See if
that looks good.
This is not a good idea, as a separate source package it should have its
own sep
On 21/01/2025 10:25, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
Le 2025-01-20 21:29, Ahmad Khalifa a écrit :
Does this make it 1 source package with 2 orig tarballs then, or
should I split it completely into 2 source packages?
Perhaps one source won't work on git unless I switch to a plain repo
On 20/01/2025 09:34, Joost van Baal-Ilić wrote:
Hi Ahmad,
I solved a related problem for a non-free package with
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/publicfile/-/blob/master/debian/get-publicfile-docs
: to be called by the user at runtime.
Not quite sure if such a hack would be suitable in your situ
On 20/01/2025 08:21, Julien Plissonneau Duquène wrote:
Hi Ahmad,
Le 2025-01-19 21:01, Ahmad Khalifa a écrit :
Any views or ideas on this? Example projects would be appreciated.
Are they already distributing an archive of the generated documentation?
If this is the case, and the license
Hi,
I'm trying to package FreeBASIC along with its documentation. However,
the documentation is built from a download of their Wiki [1].
How to deal with this situation, I could only think of...
1. Package the generated html in debian/ directly. This would work, but
I'm not sure it's good id
On 11/01/2025 20:43, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
There is no need to start new duplicate parallel efforts. Simply
contribute to the existing ones.
+1, please. Too many docs already :)
Anyone can edit the current wiki pages if they want to improve them
(although most people I spoke to don't like u
On 08/01/2025 15:37, Sébastien Noel wrote:
Le 2025-01-08 15:54, Chris Hofstaedtler a écrit :
that's new to me.
I never tried to build it on aarch64, only amd64 :-/
This might very well be a compiler bug on aarch64, who knows.
I'm totally out of my comfort zone now ^^
If it helps, I can rep
On 30/12/2024 18:07, Peter B wrote:
Maybe its my email reader (Thunderbird).
Is anyone else having this problem?
Same here, blank email in Thunderbird.
View source shows it's a normal email. Its Content-Type implies it's
signed, however there is no signature at the end of it.
--
Regards,
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On 20/12/2024 13:06, Phil Wyett wrote:
Going to try retitle from here what was the RFP that was incorrectly retitled
to an Intent To Adopt (ITA). Going to change to Intent To Package (ITP). If it
doesn't work I will change it via bts CLI.
I think this still remains
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On 20/12/2024 13:23, Phil Wyett wrote:
On Fri, 2024-12-20 at 13:11 +, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
On 20/12/2024 12:24, Phil Wyett wrote:
Additional...
A. 'debian/copyright'.
Files: *
Copyright: 2016 Oleg Lebedev
License: Apache-2.0
Section needs updating
On 20/12/2024 12:24, Phil Wyett wrote:
Additional...
A. 'debian/copyright'.
Files: *
Copyright: 2016 Oleg Lebedev
License: Apache-2.0
Section needs updating and should reflect other contributors. I know it is a
little difficult as the files do not have a header stanza.
Thanks for the review,
On 15/12/2024 22:04, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Please change visibility to public, that simplify review. Could you
move this into the Go-team?
Fixed, public visibility now.
I can't move it anywhere outside my own namespece, but happy to push it
to the team namespace if I have access there (or s
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package
"golang-github-binwiederhier-ntfy":
* Package name : golang-github-binwiederhier-ntfy
Version : 2.11.0-1
Upstream contact : htt
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "golang-github-olebedev-when":
* Package name : golang-github-olebedev-when
Version : 1.1.0-1
Upstream contact : https://github.c
On 22/11/2024 19:02, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 11:09:04AM +, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
I don't see a rule prohibiting that
Public shared libraries must be installed in a package with the name based
on the library SONAME (see Policy 8.1; you must read the who
Hi,
I'm trying to see if I can handle packaging a utility but I'm looking
for some example packages to help me figure a few things out:
1. Package installs bin+lib+headers, typically this would be 3 packages
(tool, libtool, libtool-dev), but could it be packaged as 1 with all
three parts?
I
Hi Phil,
Thanks for the review. I think most of the lintian outputs can be
resolved or overridden over time.
On 20/11/2024 14:14, Phil Wyett wrote:
8. Upgrade [Over previous installs if any]: Good
Curious, is there a public tool/script that does this in a chroot or is
it your own check?
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "coreboot":
* Package name : coreboot
Version : 24.08+dfsg-1
Upstream contact : "coreboot mailing list"
* URL : https://www.coreboot.org/
* License
21 matches
Mail list logo
