now it works again
thanks anyway
a.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 12:36:55PM +0100, debdev wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:51:54AM +, James Troup wrote:
> > Use the anonymous upload queue on ftp-master. I believe you want to
> > use something like "dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master foo.chang
now it works again
thanks anyway
a.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 12:36:55PM +0100, debdev wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:51:54AM +, James Troup wrote:
> > Use the anonymous upload queue on ftp-master. I believe you want to
> > use something like "dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master foo.chang
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:51:54AM +, James Troup wrote:
> Use the anonymous upload queue on ftp-master. I believe you want to
> use something like "dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master foo.changes" for
> dupload and "dput ftp-master foo.changes" for, err, dput. But I don't
> use either of these
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:51:54AM +, James Troup wrote:
> Use the anonymous upload queue on ftp-master. I believe you want to
> use something like "dupload --to anonymous-ftp-master foo.changes" for
> dupload and "dput ftp-master foo.changes" for, err, dput. But I don't
> use either of these
hi
I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
the first time, I (of course) check the package
(lintian, install it, etc etc)
but what about the next times? what is the best practice?
1) simply resign it, and upload.
2) rebuild it from source each time
I would prefer the 1st , for savin
hi
I would like to sponsor a package of a friend
the first time, I (of course) check the package
(lintian, install it, etc etc)
but what about the next times? what is the best practice?
1) simply resign it, and upload.
2) rebuild it from source each time
I would prefer the 1st , for savin
hi
for some reason, it seems that auto-builders are not catching up
on my packages for woody-proposed-updates
here are the autobuilders logs:
snmpkit
* 0.9-4.woody.2 (s390) (latest build at Sep 18 17:01: maybe-successful)
* 0.9-4.woody.2 (hppa) (latest build at Sep 18 17:04: maybe-su
hi
for some reason, it seems that auto-builders are not catching up
on my packages for woody-proposed-updates
here are the autobuilders logs:
snmpkit
* 0.9-4.woody.2 (s390) (latest build at Sep 18 17:01: maybe-successful)
* 0.9-4.woody.2 (hppa) (latest build at Sep 18 17:04: maybe-su
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:51:56PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:20:52PM +0100, A Mennucc1 wrote:
> > may someone give a look?
> >
> > #include
>
> You should be #including instead of ;
> try that.
it gives the same error
>
On Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 11:51:56PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 04:20:52PM +0100, A Mennucc1 wrote:
> > may someone give a look?
> >
> > #include
>
> You should be #including instead of ;
> try that.
it gives the same error
>
hi
if `date -u` is later than Thu Dec 13 20:00:00 UTC 2001
then please skip this message
we are trying to port some code from Window$ to Debian
I found the below behaviour which may be a bug, and have posted it as
such... but maybe it is not a bug (I am not very good at c++)
may someone gi
hi
if `date -u` is later than Thu Dec 13 20:00:00 UTC 2001
then please skip this message
we are trying to port some code from Window$ to Debian
I found the below behaviour which may be a bug, and have posted it as
such... but maybe it is not a bug (I am not very good at c++)
may someone g
hi
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic
> > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is:
> > replace them by the f
hi
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:33:18PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Florian,
>
> In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic
> links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is:
> replace them by the file to which they are linked.
not necessarily
for
hi
I have started seeing these errors myself a few months ago
problem was, I had upgraded to woody, and the new
autotools create symlinks by default instead of real files
solution (from my xmorph package): run ./autogen.sh once, and
put in the debian/rules
build: build-stamp
build-
hi
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:47:04PM +0100, Florian Hinzmann wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> On 04-Nov-2001 Steve M. Robbins wrote:
>
> > In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic
> > links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is:
> > replace them by the
hi
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 03:33:18PM -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Florian,
>
> In your original mail, the question was what to do about symbolic
> links like "missing --> /usr/share/automake/missing". The answer is:
> replace them by the file to which they are linked.
not necessarily
fo
hi
I have started seeing these errors myself a few months ago
problem was, I had upgraded to woody, and the new
autotools create symlinks by default instead of real files
solution (from my xmorph package): run ./autogen.sh once, and
put in the debian/rules
build: build-stamp
build
hi
I have been also discussing with Darius Pietrzak
(and thru him with the mplayer developers) about uploading mplayer into
debian. Note that Darius Pietrzak is not a mantainer afaik.
mplayer is already packaged by D.P., the standard way,
but this is not what we want: we want a thing that autom
hi
I have been also discussing with Darius Pietrzak
(and thru him with the mplayer developers) about uploading mplayer into
debian. Note that Darius Pietrzak is not a mantainer afaik.
mplayer is already packaged by D.P., the standard way,
but this is not what we want: we want a thing that auto
hi
the mainstream author has asked to name the packages
libwaili-*
instead of
libwaili-gpl-
I have done some changes; may you please check again? thanks
bye
--
A Mennucc
"È un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Renato Carotone)
hi
the mainstream author has asked to name the packages
libwaili-*
instead of
libwaili-gpl-
I have done some changes; may you please check again? thanks
bye
--
A Mennucc
"È un mondo difficile. Che vita intensa!" (Renato Carotone)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
hi
I am a new mantainer , and have packaged a library called waili
I am not entirely satisfied by the work done...
(in particular, the docs are not going where I would like,
and one of the two packages is missing the "README.Debian")
may someone check my work? thanks
it is all in
http://t
hi
I am a new mantainer , and have packaged a library called waili
I am not entirely satisfied by the work done...
(in particular, the docs are not going where I would like,
and one of the two packages is missing the "README.Debian")
may someone check my work? thanks
it is all in
http://
24 matches
Mail list logo
