Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "rumur":
* Package name : rumur
Version : 2025.02.02-1
Upstream contact : Matthew Fernandez
* URL : https://github.com/Smattr/rumur
* License : Unl
Hi mentors,
I was previously instructed to remove python3 from my package’s suggests
because it is always installed.¹ However when doing this and now trying
to package a new version, Lintian is upset:
E: rumur: python3-script-but-no-python3-dep python3 (does not satisfy
python3:any | pytho
On 2/2/25 07:30, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote:
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 07:26:53AM +1100, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
The Lintian advice appears to contradict mentor instructions. What is the
right approach here? Is python3 meant to appear somewhere else as a weak
dep?
The mentor instructions are
On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 07:26:53AM +1100, Matthew Fernandez wrote:
> Hi mentors,
>
> I was previously instructed to remove python3 from my package’s suggests
> because it is always installed.¹ However when doing this and now trying to
> package a new version, Lintian is upset:
>
> E: rumur: pyt
Your message dated Sun, 2 Feb 2025 06:42:58 +1100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1092140: RFS: rumur/2025.01.05-1 -- model checker for
the Murphi language
has caused the Debian Bug report #1092140,
regarding RFS: rumur/2025.01.05-1 -- model checker for the Murphi language
to be marked a
On Saturday, February 1, 2025 8:46:23 AM MST Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Clarify license issues
>
> On 01/02/2025 08:58, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > 3. Licenses [4]: Issue, possible false positive, needs review[...]>
> > d/copyright | licensecheck
> >
> > LGPL-2+ | Z
On Sat, 1 Feb 2025 12:20:37 + philippe marguinaud
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
>
> I changed the debian/watch file following your prescriptions, and tried uscan
--force-download, which succeeded to download the source tarball.
>
> Thank you again,
>
> Philippe
>
> __
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Clarify license issues
On 01/02/2025 08:58, Phil Wyett wrote:
3. Licenses [4]: Issue, possible false positive, needs review[...]> d/copyright
| licensecheck
LGPL-2+ | Zlib bootstrap/inc/allegro5/allegro_acodec.bi
[...]
LGPL-2+ |
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
I changed the debian/watch file following your prescriptions, and tried uscan
--force-download, which succeeded to download the source tarball.
Thank you again,
Philippe
From: philippe marguinaud
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2025 2:21 P
9 matches
Mail list logo
