Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "kcheckers"
* Package name: kcheckers
Version : 0.8.1-4
Upstream Author : Andi Peredri
Artur Wiebe
* URL : http://sourceforge.net/proj
Hi Guys,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package.
https://mentors.debian.net/package/pokemmo
Changes were made to the package version as revised by the sponsor.
1. Removed the file in 'src/pokemmo_bootstrapper.jar' and in 'd/copyright'.
2. Added in d/control:
* Changed section for "non-fre
Your message dated Mon, 1 Jan 2018 02:28:16 +0100
with message-id <20180101012816.lp2tpzusl4m5y...@angband.pl>
and subject line Re: Bug#884780: RFS: piu-piu/1.0-1 [ITP]
has caused the Debian Bug report #884780,
regarding RFS: piu-piu/1.0-1 [ITP]
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Sun, 31 Dec 2017 22:20:18 +
with message-id
and subject line closing RFS: pokemmo/1.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Multiplayer online game
based on the Pokemon universe
has caused the Debian Bug report #884580,
regarding RFS: pokemmo/1.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Multiplayer online game based on the
P
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 06:38:20PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:23:51PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> > Can someone read the bug report[0] an give
> > an second opinion?
> >
> > [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404
> >
> > We disagree when a
Em 31-12-2017 15:38, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:23:51PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> Can someone read the bug report[0] an give
>> an second opinion?
>>
>> [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404
>>
>> We disagree when an NMU is neces
Lukas Schwaighofer writes:
> Ok, I expected as much. Any suggestions on where to put that?
> /usr/share/doc/syslinux-efi/copyright seems like the obvious place (and
> is mandated by policy ยง12.5) but if I understand the machine readable
> format correctly, it doesn't support my use-case at all (
Hello,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:23:51PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Can someone read the bug report[0] an give
> an second opinion?
>
> [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404
>
> We disagree when an NMU is necessary and how
> important the request is.
wow - wtf.
I'
Hi,
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 19:42:01 -0800
Russ Allbery wrote:
> I don't think you need to change anything about Built-Using. That
> seems like exactly the sort of reason anticipated by DFSG
> compliance. The clarification in Policy is because the previous
> wording would have required literally e
Hi,
I am having difficult to end a situation
with duc Debian package.
Can someone read the bug report[0] an give
an second opinion?
[0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404
We disagree when an NMU is necessary and how
important the request is.
Regards,
Herbert
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 14:21:25 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 09:07:07AM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 02:51:28 +0100, Adam Borowski
>> wrote:
>> >I wonder if it would be better to name the command-like tool package
>> >"t3highlight" instead of "libt3
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 14:17:12 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 09:00:27AM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote:
>> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 21:32:05 +0100, Adam Borowski
>> wrote:
>> >It Build-Depends on a package named libxcb-dev that doesn't exist.
>> >
>> >There's an alternate depende
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 14:21:25 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 09:07:07AM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote:
>> On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 02:51:28 +0100, Adam Borowski
>> wrote:
>> >I wonder if it would be better to name the command-like tool package
>> >"t3highlight" instead of "libt3
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 09:07:07AM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 02:51:28 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >I wonder if it would be better to name the command-like tool package
> >"t3highlight" instead of "libt3highlight-bin". Usually, libfoo-bin is for
> >tools required by or d
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 09:00:27AM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 21:32:05 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> >It Build-Depends on a package named libxcb-dev that doesn't exist.
> >
> >There's an alternate dependency on libx11-dev, but those are ignored for
> >official packages, bei
On Sat, 30 Dec 2017 21:32:05 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:30:46PM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libt3key". This is one of
>> the dependencies of the Tilde text editor (#692512).
>>
>> * Package name: libt3key
>>Vers
On Sun, 31 Dec 2017 02:51:28 +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 01:43:56PM +0100, Gertjan Halkes wrote:
>> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libt3highlight". This is one
>> of the dependencies for the Tilde text editor (#692512).
>>
>> * Package name: libt3highlig
17 matches
Mail list logo
