Em 31-12-2017 15:38, Mattia Rizzolo escreveu: > Hello, > > On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 01:23:51PM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote: >> Can someone read the bug report[0] an give >> an second opinion? >> >> [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=885404 >> >> We disagree when an NMU is necessary and how >> important the request is. > > wow - wtf. > > I'll keep my comments here structured: > > 1) I believe Jonathan is very very hasty on making NMUs > a) whilst true that NMUs today are seen very much with a nicer eye than > in the past, it's still considered not something to do lightly, not > even when somebody is on the LowNMU list or the package is in > collab-maint > b) also, upload an NMU the day after saying he has a patch and 3 days > after the original bug report is totally hasty, no matter the delay > c) and usually as soon as the maintainer replies to a bug all the > intentions to NMU drops in favour of a team upload (unless the > maintainer asks for a NMU, as it often happens) > 2) I totally don't understand what's Herbert's problem with the > proposal, providing /usr/bin/duc from both the regular and -nox > package sounds a very nice idea to me > >
The problem is: Why think about this if an alias, an alias, gives what he wants. Why spend more than a minute with this. > Summary: please just stop meta-discussing whether or not a NMU was the > appropriate action to take, and start discussing the actual bug, with > neither party being so stubborn as it looks from my side. I sent an email to mentors because the way things are going he will make another upload. No delay, not nothing. Just upload. I am stopping.
