control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hello,
>I did the patch myself.
do you really need to patch:
Makefile.in.in
and add a new config.rpath file?
also, please drop the last part of the patch:
@@ -443,4 +443,4 @@
;(new-figure "Ma figure")
;(define a (Numeric "a" 'free 0 0 1))
-;(define p (Point "o" 'inter
Your message dated Wed, 19 Apr 2017 06:43:23 + (UTC)
with message-id <431029177.4562400.1492584204...@mail.yahoo.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#860598: RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-4 [RC]
has caused the Debian Bug report #860598,
regarding RFS: openldap/2.4.44+dfsg-4 [RC]
to be marked as done.
Thi
Hi Christian,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 11:07:03PM +0200, Christian Seiler wrote:
> >
> > which is probably due to the fact that I did not changed hmmer2 to
> > create a shared rather than a static library and lhmmer is not compiled
> > with -fPIC. What might be the less stressful way to solve thi
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor to upload an updated openldap package targeted at
stretch. The changes have already been pre-approved by the release team in
#860448. The upload fixes one RC bug and one important bug and updates the
debco
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 10:13 AM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "simple-obfs", which is a new
> dependency of shadowsocks-libev since v3.0.3
Hi Roger,
Great work! Though there are a few things to address before uploading.
The largest ones are around the watch f
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 09:10:52AM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Thanks for your review!
No problem.
> I think these are all simple fix that suitable for stretch.
> The policy don't require pre-approval to upload to unstable [0].
>
> If the unblock is rejected, and som
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> * Fixed compatibility with Guile 2.0. (Closes: #707903)
Thank you for your work to fix this bug.
What is the source of the patch you have added?
I did the patch myself.
Also, your changelog needs to be much more detailed. Yo
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Dear Sean,
Thanks for your review!
Very helpful. And I pushed my fixes to branch qa_upload2.
(I removed the final releasing commit of branch qa_upload, and added update
commit)
Package also re-uploaded to DoM amd64 and mentors.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:37:20 -0700
Sean
On 04/18/2017 11:01 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/build/psortb-3.0.4+dfsg=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wl,-z,relro
> -shared -L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector-strong HMM.o hmm-binding.o -o
> ../blib/arch/auto/Algor
Hi Walter,
On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 01:26:58PM -0700, Walter Landry wrote:
> > hmm-binding.cpp: In member function ‘void HMM::init(char*, int, int)’:
> > hmm-binding.cpp:245:20: error: ‘CUT_NONE’ was not declared in this scope
> >thresh.autocut = CUT_NONE;
> > ^~~~
> > M
Hi Andreas,
On 04/18/2017 10:15 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> The definition of the structure threshold_s can be found in
> /usr/include/hmmer2/structs.h (of package libhmmer2-dev) and
> looks like
>
> struct threshold_s {
> float globT; /* T parameter: keep only hits > globT bits
Andreas Tille wrote:
> hmm-binding.cpp: In member function ‘void HMM::init(char*, int, int)’:
> hmm-binding.cpp:245:20: error: ‘CUT_NONE’ was not declared in this scope
>thresh.autocut = CUT_NONE;
> ^~~~
> Makefile:346: recipe for target 'hmm-binding.o' failed
It is di
Hi,
I intend to package psortb in Debian Med team[1]. To successfully build
this package I needed to re-arrange the package layout of biosquid and
hmmer2 since psortb is using code from those project but only provides
the according header files. This was solved by proper -dev packages -
however,
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:03:33 +0200
with message-id <1492538613.18372.5.ca...@profitbricks.com>
and subject line Re: RFS: rdma-core [ITP] rdma-core -- RDMA Core Userspace
Libraries and Daemons
has caused the Debian Bug report #850145,
regarding RFS: rdma-core [ITP] rdma-core -- RDMA
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Roger,
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 08:25:16PM +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "equivs"
Thanks for working on all these improvements and fixes.
Here is a review of 9818bd99a15efbbbf37eace90480f69e682f2e8f:
- Shouldn't this targe
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 05:59:11PM -0400, Patrick Hetu wrote:
> * Fixed compatibility with Guile 2.0. (Closes: #707903)
Thank you for your work to fix this bug.
What is the source of the patch you have added? It is not indicated
anywhere. Did it come from upstream?
On 2017-04-18 13:13, Roger Shimizu wrote:
Interesting package!
Actually it looks like usbguard (already in stretch) + LDAP + PAM.
Could you kindly push your packaging code to some SCM, such as github?
This could make the review easier. Thank you!
Cheers,
Hi Roger,
Thank's for the reply! The
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 20:13:55 +0900
Roger Shimizu wrote:
> Interesting package!
> Actually it looks like usbguard (already in stretch) + LDAP + PAM.
>
> Could you kindly push your packaging code to some SCM, such as github?
> This could make the review easier. Thank you!
I cannot sponsor your pa
On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 09:23:54 +0200
p...@reseau-libre.net wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbwall"
>
> * Package name: usbwall
> Version : 0.4-1
> Upstream Author : Sylvain Leroy
>
Hi Anton, thanks for responding to my sponsorship request.
I still have to iterate on a few things with upstream. Since 0.9.2 has
already been tested, validated and tagged, would you mind pushing it anyway?
The source package will have to do another trip to NEW because of the
new doc package.
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "usbwall"
* Package name: usbwall
Version : 0.4-1
Upstream Author : Sylvain Leroy
* URL : https://github.com/Oline/usbwall
* License : MIT
Sectio
21 matches
Mail list logo
